Surveillance after colorectal polypectomy; comparison between Japan and US

Kobe Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Tanaka, Shinwa ^a   Obata, Daisuke ^a   Chinzei, Ryo ^a   Yoshida, Shiei ^a   Sanuki, Tuyoshi ^a   Morita, Yoshinori ^a   Yoshida, Masaru ^a   Fujita, Tsuyoshi ^a   Toyonaga, Takashi ^a   Kutsumi, Hiromu ^a   Inokuchi, Hideto ^a   Azuma, Takeshi ^a  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Colonoscopy; Polypectomy; Recommendation; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLON POLYPOSIS; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAPAN; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; POLYPECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES;

COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79951470842     PISSN: 00232513     EISSN: 18830498     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Snover DC, Bradley GM, Schuman LM, Ederer F.et al. 1993. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med 328: 1365-1371.
2. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G. et al. 2000. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med; 343:162-168.
3. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. et al. 2000. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med;343:169-174.
4. Schoenfeld P, Cash B, Flood A, Dobhan R, Eastone J, Coyle W. et al. 2005 Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med;352:2061-2068.
5. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, et al. 1993. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med; 329:1977-1981.
6. F Citarda, G Tomaselli, R Capocaccia, S Barcherini, M Crespi. 2001 The Italian Multicentre Study Group. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancerincidence. Gut;48:812-815.
7. Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. 1992. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision ofrectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med;326:658-662.
8. Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J, Langmark F, Majak BM, Vatn MH. et al. 1999. Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy:effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I. Scand J Gastroenterol;34:414-420.
9. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP Jr, Weiss NS. 1992. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer.N Engl J Med;326:653-657.
10. Newcomb PA, Norfleet RG, Storer BE, Surawicz TS, Marcus PM. 1992. Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst;84:1572-1575.
11. Newcomb PA, Storer BE, Morimoto LM, Templeton A, Potter JD. 2003. Long-term efficacy of sigmoidoscopy in the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst;95:622-625.
12. Bertario L, Russo A, Sala P, Pizzetti P, Ballardini G, Andreola S. et al. 2003. Predictors of metachronous colorectal neoplasms in sporadic adenoma patients. Int J Cancer;105:82-87.
13. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J. et al. 2003. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 124: 544-560.
14. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, Stillman JS, O'brien MJ, Levin B. et al. 2006. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: aconsensus updated by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 130: 1872-1885.
15. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O'Brien MJ, Ho MN, Gottlieb L, Sternberg SS. et al. 1993. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. N Engl J Med 328: 901-906.
16. Sano Y, Fujii T, Oda Y. 2004. A multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to evaluated follow-up surveillance strategies for colorectal cancer: The Japan Polyp Study. Digest Endosc 16: 376-378.
17. Boolchand V, Olds G, Singh J, Singh P, Chak A, Cooper GS. et al. 2006. Colorectal Screening after Polypectomy: A National Survey Study of Primary Care Physicians. Ann Intern Med. Nov 7; 145(9):654-9.
18. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Clark DW, Helper DJ, et al. 1997. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology.;112: 24-8.
19. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, Levin TR, Burt RW, Johnson DA. et al. 2002. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97: 1296-1308.
20. Barclay RI, Vicari JJ, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RI. 2005. Variation in adenoma detection rates and colonoscopic withdrawal times during screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc; 61: 100-107.
21. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS. et al. 1993. Preventon of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med; 329:1977-1981.
22. Ransohoff DF. 2005. Have we oversold colonoscopy? Gastroenterology; 129: 1815.
23. Foster E., Fukami N. 2008. Clinical Gastroenterology; 23:259-262.