Assessing the information desire of patients with advanced cancer by providing information with a decision aid, which is evaluated in a randomized trial: A study protocol

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Oostendorp, Linda J M ^a   Ottevanger, Petronella B ^a   Van Der Graaf, Winette T A ^a   Stalmeier, Peep F M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HUMAN; NEOPLASM; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIOECONOMICS;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 79851512649     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. LF Degner LJ Kristjanson D Bowman JA Sloan KC Carriere J O'Neil B Bilodeau P Watson B Mueller, JAMA 1997 (Pubitemid 27208893)
2. Individual difference in coping. HW Krohne, Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications New York: Wiley & Sons, Zeidner M, Endler NS, 1996 381 409
3. Coping, psychosocial well-being and anxiety in cancer patients at follow-up visits. C Lampic A Wennberg JE Schill B Glimelius O Brodin PO Sjödén, Acta Oncol 1994 33 887 894 10.3109/02841869409098451 7818920
4. Coping en controle. AV Ranchor MJ Schroevers R Sanderman, Psychologische patintenzorg in de oncologie: handboek voor de professional Koninklijke van Gorcum, Assen, De Haes JCJM, Gualthérie van Weezel LM, Sanderman R, van de Wiel HBM, 2001 Chapter 4 47 59
5. Behavioral decision research: a constructive processing perspective. JW Payne JR Bettman EJ Johnson, Annual Review of Psychology 1992 43 87 131 10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000511
6. Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review. CM Gaston G Mitchell, Soc Sci Med 2005 61 2252 2264 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.015 15922501 (Pubitemid 41262516)
7. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. BR Cassileth RV Zupkis K Sutton-Smith V March, Ann Intern Med 1980 92 832 836 7387025 (Pubitemid 10124374)
8. Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients. CG Blanchard MS Labrecque JC Ruckdeschel EB Blanchard, Soc Sci Med 1988 27 1139 1145 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90343-7 3206248
9. Truth may hurt but deceit hurts more: communication in palliative care. LJ Fallowfield VA Jenkins HA Beveridge, Palliat Med 2002 16 297 303 10.1191/0269216302pm575oa 12132542 (Pubitemid 34785126)
10. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. V Jenkins L Fallowfield J Saul, Br J Cancer 2001 84 48 51 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1573 11139312 (Pubitemid 32102503)
11. Cancer patient preferences for communication of prognosis in the metastatic setting. RG Hagerty PN Butow PA Ellis EA Lobb S Pendlebury N Leighl D Goldstein SK Lo MH Tattersall, J Clin Oncol 2004 22 1721 1730 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.095 15117995 (Pubitemid 41079812)
12. Patients' preferences for therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: development, testing, and application of a bedside decision instrument. LM Elit MN Levine A Gafni TJ Whelan G Doig DL Streiner B Rosen, Gynecol Oncol 1996 62 329 335 10.1006/gyno.1996.0244 8812525 (Pubitemid 26322421)
13. Informing and involving cancer patients in their own care. M Jefford MH Tattersall, Lancet Oncol 2002 3 629 637 10.1016/S1470-2045(02)00877-X 12372725 (Pubitemid 35174681)
14. When the treatment goal is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions? M Gattellari KJ Voigt PN Butow MH Tattersall, J Clin Oncol 2002 20 503 513 10.1200/JCO.20.2.503 11786580 (Pubitemid 34072535)
15. When the treatment goal is not cure: are patients informed adequately? MH Tattersall M Gattellari K Voigt PN Butow, Support Care Cancer 2002 10 314 321 10.1007/s005200100291 12029431 (Pubitemid 36056286)
16. The content and amount of information given by medical oncologists when telling patients with advanced cancer what their treatment options are: palliative chemotherapy and watchful-waiting. CG Koedoot FJ Oort RJ de Haan PJ Bakker A de Graeff JC de Haes, Eur J Cancer 2004 40 225 235 10.1016/j.ejca.2003. 10.008 14728937 (Pubitemid 38077025)
17. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. AS Zigmond RP Snaith, Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983 67 361 370 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x 6880820 (Pubitemid 13098606)
18. Cancer risk notification: psychosocial and ethical implications. C Lerman BK Rimer PF Engstrom, J Clin Oncol 1991 9 1275 1282 2045867
19. Predictors of and satisfaction with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. ME Stefanek KJ Helzlsouer PM Wilcox F Houn, Prev Med 1995 24 412 419 10.1006/pmed.1995.1066 7479633
20. The development of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: a shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. M Groenvold MA Petersen NK Aaronson JI Arraras JM Blazeby A Bottomley PM Fayers A de Graeff E Hammerlid S Kaasa, et al. Eur J Cancer 2006 42 55 64 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.06.022 16162404 (Pubitemid 41818953)
21. Development of a questionnaire measure of adjustment to cancer: the MAC scale. M Watson S Greer J Young Q Inayat C Burgess B Robertson, Psychol Med 1988 18 203 209 10.1017/S0033291700002026 3363039 (Pubitemid 18071647)
22. P Pierce, Michigan Assessment of Decision Style (MADS) Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan 1995
23. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? RB Deber N Kraetschmer J Irvine, Arch Intern Med 1996 156 1414 1420 10.1001/archinte. 156.13.1414 8678709 (Pubitemid 26226935)
24. Breast irradiation postlumpectomy: development and evaluation of a decision instrument. TJ Whelan MN Levine A Gafni H Lukka EA Mohide M Patel DL Streiner, J Clin Oncol 1995 13 847 853 7707110
25. Cancer patients' desires for communication of prognosis information. SA Kaplowitz S Campo WT Chiu, Health Commun 2002 14 221 241 10.1207/ S15327027HC1402-4 12046799
26. Death acceptance: A two component formulation and a scale. L Klug A Sinha, Omega 1987 18 229 235
27. Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale. A Fagerlin BJ Zikmund-Fisher PA Ubel A Jankovic HA Derry DM Smith, Med Decis Making 2007 27 672 680 10.1177/0272989X07304449 17641137 (Pubitemid 47547594)
28. The decision evaluation scales. PF Stalmeier MS Roosmalen LC Verhoef JE Hoekstra-Weebers JC Oosterwijk U Moog N Hoogerbrugge WA van Daal, Patient Educ Couns 2005 57 286 293 10.1016/j.pec.2004.07.010 15893210 (Pubitemid 40694007)
29. Tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life: development of the QQ Questionnaire for Cancer Patient Attitudes. AM Stiggelbout JC de Haes GM Kiebert J Kievit JW Leer, Med Decis Making 1996 16 184 192 10.1177/0272989X9601600211 8778537 (Pubitemid 26108911)
30. Patterns of psychiatric morbidity in a genito-urinary clinic. A validation of the Hospital Anxiety Depression scale (HAD). P Barczak N Kane S Andrews AM Congdon JC Clay T Betts, Br J Psychiatry 1988 152 698 700 10.1192/bjp.152.5.698 3167448
31. Screening for depression and anxiety in cancer patients using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. BT Carroll RG Kathol R Noyes Jr TG Wald GH Clamon, Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1993 15 69 74 10.1016/0163-8343(93)90099-A 8472942 (Pubitemid 23118435)
32. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. AR Feinstein DV Cicchetti, J Clin Epidemiol 1990 43 543 549 10.1016/0895-4356(90) 90158-L 2348207 (Pubitemid 20178543)
33. The dependence of Cohen's kappa on the prevalence does not matter. W Vach, J Clin Epidemiol 2005 58 655 661 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.02.021 15939215 (Pubitemid 40797894)