Deficit irrigation for enhancing sustainable water use: Comparison of cotton nitrogen uptake and prediction of lint yield in a multivariate autoregressive state-space model

Environmental and Experimental Botany

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 224-231

  Li, Hong ^a   Lascano, Robert J ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Alfisoils; Cotton plant water relations; Cotton water stress; Deficit irrigation; Field landscape attributes; Reflectance water index

Indexed keywords

AGRONOMY; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); COTTON; CROP PRODUCTION; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; IRRIGATION; LANDSCAPE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NDVI; NITRATE; NITROGEN; NUMERICAL MODEL; NUTRIENT UPTAKE; OPTIMIZATION; PLANT WATER RELATIONS; SEMIARID REGION; SOIL WATER; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; WATER STRESS; WATER SUPPLY; WATER USE; YIELD RESPONSE;

GREAT PLAINS;

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 79851510182     PISSN: 00988472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baker J.T., Gitz D.C., Wanjura D.F., Upchurch D.R. Using leaf gas exchange to quantify drought in cotton irrigated based on canopy temperature measurements. Agron. J. 2007, 99:644-737.
2. Blum A. Crop responses to drought and the interpretation of adaptation. Plant Growth Regul. 1996, 20:135-148.
3. Claudio H.C., Cheng Y., Fuentes D.A., Camon J.A., Luo H., Ocechel W., Qiu H.-L., Rahman A.F., Sims D.A. Monitoring drought effects on vegetation water content and fluxes in chaparral with the 970nm water band index. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 103:304-311.
4. Fereres E., Soriano M.A. Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58:147-159.
5. Florinsky I.V., Kulagina T.B., Meshalkina L. Influence of topography on landscape radiation temperature distribution. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1994, 15:3147-3153.
6. Grant O.M., Johnson A.W., Davies M.J., James C.M., Simpson D.W. Physiological and morphological diversity of cultivated strawberry (Frgaria×ananassa) in response to water deficit. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 68:264-272.
7. Griffiths H., Parry M.A.J. Plant responses to water stress. Ann. Bot. 2002, 89. 801-801.
8. Guru M.V., Horne J.E. The Ogallala Aquifer 2000, The Kerr Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Inc., Poteau, OK, p. 32.
9. Holmes W., Petrulis M. Groundwater Irrigation: Declining Water Levels in the Texas High Plains translate to Declining Economic Performance 1988, USDA/ERS, Agriculture and Rural Economy Division, Washington, DC, p. 13.
10. Jackson R.D. Canopy temperature and crop water stress. Ad. Irri. 1982, 1:43-85.
11. Jones H.G., Archer N., Rotenberg E., Casa R. Radiation measurement for plant ecophysiology. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54:879-889.
12. Lascano R.J. A general system to measure and to calculate daily crop water use. Agron. J. 2000, 92:821-832.
13. Lascano R.J., Li H. Precision farming to improve water use. Encycl. Water Sci. 2003, 740-743. Marcel Dekker, New York. B.A. Stewart, A. Howell (Eds.).
14. Lascano R.J., Van Bavel C.H.M. Explicit and recursive calculation of potential and actual evapotranspiration. Agron. J. 2007, 99:585-590.
15. Lawlor D.W. Carbon and nitrogen assimilation in relation to yield: mechanisms are the key to understand production systems. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53:773-787.
16. Li H., Lascano R.J., Barnes E., Booker J., Wilson L.T., Bronson K.F., Segarra E. Multispectral reflectance of cotton related to plant growth, soil water, texture, and site elevation. Agron. J. 2001, 93:1327-1337.
17. Li H., Lascano R.J., Booker J., Wilson L.T., Bronson K.F., Segarra E. State-space description of field heterogeneity: water and nitrogen use in cotton. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2002, 66:585-595.
18. Li H., Payne W.A., Michels J., Rush C.M. Reducing plant abiotic and biotic stress from drought and attacks of greenbugs, corn leaf aphids and virus disease in dryland sorghum. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2008, 63:305-316.
19. Li H., Li T., Gordon R.J., Asiedu S.K., Hu K. Strawberry plant fruiting efficiency and its correlation with solar irradiance, temperature and reflectance water index variation. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 68:165-174.
20. Mittler R. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11:15-19.
21. Nielsen D.R., Wendroth O. Spatial and Temporal Statistics 2003, Catena Verlag GMBH, Reiskirchen, Germany, 398 pp.
22. SAS Institute SAS/STAT User's Guide 1990, Cary, North Carolina. 4th ed.
23. SAS Institute SAS/STAT User's Guide 1993, Cary, North Carolina. 2nd ed.
24. Institute S.A.S. SAS/STAT Technical Report: Spatial Prediction using the SAS System 1996, Cary, North Carolina.
25. Sperry J.S., Hacke U.G., Oren R., Comstock J.P. Water deficits and hydraulic limits to leaf water supply. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25:251-263.
26. Timm L.C., Reichardt K., Oliveira J.C.M., Cassaro F.A.M., Tominaga T.T., Bacchi O.O.S., Dourado-Neto D. Sugarcane production evaluated by the state-space approach. J. Hydrol. 2003, 272:226-237.
27. Wanjura D.F., Upchurch D.R., Mahan J.R., Burke J.J. Cotton yield and applied water relationships under drip irrigation. Agric. Water Manage. 2002, 55:217-237.
28. Werteker M., Lorenz A., Johannes H., Berghofer E., Findlay C.S. Environmental and varietal influences on the fatty acid composition of rapessed, soybeans and sunflowers. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2010, 196:20-27.