Diurnal and position-induced variability of impedance cardiography measurements in healthy subjects

Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 145-150

  Tomsin, Kathleen ^a,b   Mesens, Tinne ^b   Molenberghs, Geert ^a   Gyselaers, Wilfried ^a,b  

^a HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b DEPARTMENT OF CARDIOLOGY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular parameters; Haemodynamic monitoring; Intra class correlation; Postural challenge; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; BELGIUM; CARDIOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; DIZZINESS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; POSTURE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUPINE POSITION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79851504678     PISSN: 14750961     EISSN: 1475097X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2010.00993.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Albert NM, Hail MD, Li J, Young JB. Equivalence of the bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in measuring cardiac output in hospitalized patients with advanced, decompensated chronic heart failure. Am J Crit Care (2004); 13: 469-479.
2. Bau PF, Bau CH, Naujorks AA, Rosito GA, Fuchs FD. Diurnal variation of vascular diameter and reactivity in healthy young men. Braz J Med Biol Res (2008); 41: 500-503.
3. Cotter G, Moshkovitz Y, Kaluski E, Cohen AJ, Miller H, Goor D, Vered Z. Accurate, noninvasive continuous monitoring of cardiac output by whole-body electrical bioimpedance. Chest (2004); 125: 1431-1440.
4. de Waal EE, Konings MK, Kalkman CJ, Buhre WF. Assessment of stroke volume index with three different bioimpedance algorithms: lack of agreement compared to thermodilution. Intensive Care Med (2008); 34: 735-739.
5. Donovan KD, Dobb GJ, Woods WP, Hockings BE. Comparison of transthoracic electrical impedance and thermodilution methods for measuring cardiac output. Crit Care Med (1986); 14: 1038-1044.
6. Drazner MH, Thompson B, Rosenberg PB, Kaiser PA, Boehrer JD, Baldwin BJ, Dries DL, Yancy CW. Comparison of impedance cardiography with invasive hemodynamic measurements in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol (2002); 89: 993-995.
7. Dubois D, Dubois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med (1916); 17: 863-871.
8. Engoren M, Barbee D. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method. Am J Crit Care (2005); 14: 40-45.
9. Hett DA, Jonas MM. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring. Intensive Crit Care Nurs (2004); 20: 103-108.
10. Kario K, Schwartz JE, Pickering TG. Ambulatory physical activity as a determinant of diurnal blood pressure variation. Hypertension (1999); 34: 685-691.
11. Kim DW. Detection of physiological events by impedance. Yonsei Med J (1989); 30: 1-11.
12. Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson RP, Witsoe DA, Mattson RH. Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerospace Med (1966); 37: 1208-1212.
13. Lance VQ, Spodick DH. Heart rate-left ventricular ejection time relations. Variations during postural change and cardiovascular challenges. Br Heart J (1976); 38: 1332-1338.
14. Mathews L, Singh RK. Cardiac output monitoring. Ann Card Anaesth (2008); 11: 56-68.
15. Mitchell JE, Palta S. New diagnostic modalities in the diagnosis of heart failure. J Natl Med Assoc (2004); 96: 1424-1430.
16. Olufsen MS, Ottesen JT, Tran HT, Ellwein LM, Lipsitz LA, Novak V. Blood pressure and blood flow variation during postural change from sitting to standing: model development and validation. J Appl Physiol (2005); 99: 1523-1537.
17. Ono T, Yasuda Y, Ito T, Barros AK, Ishida K, Miyamura M, Yoshizawa M, Yambe T. Validity of the adaptive filter for accurate measurement of cardiac output in impedance cardiography. Tohoku J Exp Med (2004); 202: 181-191.
18. Ramirez-Marrero FA, Charkoudian N, Hart EC, Schroeder D, Zhong L, Eisenach JH, Joyner MJ. Cardiovascular dynamics in healthy subjects with differing heart rate responses to tilt. J Appl Physiol (2008); 105: 1448-1453.
19. Shaw JA, Chin-Dusting JP, Kingwell BA, Dart AM. Diurnal variation in endothelium-dependent vasodilatation is not apparent in coronary artery disease. Circulation (2001); 103: 806-812.
20. Sodolski T, Kutarski A. Impedance cardiography: a valuable method of evaluating haemodynamic parameters. Cardiol J (2007); 14: 115-126.
21. Spiess BD, Patel MA, Soltow LO, Wright IH. Comparison of bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output during cardiac surgery: evaluation of a second-generation bioimpedance device. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth (2001); 15: 567-573.
22. Thomas SH. Impedance cardiography using the Sramek-Bernstein method: accuracy and variability at rest and during exercise. Br J Clin Pharmacol (1992); 34: 467-476.
23. Tuckman J, Shillingford J. Effect of different degrees of tilt on cardiac output, heart rate, and blood pressure in normal man. Br Heart J (1966); 28: 32-39.
24. Van De Water JM, Miller TW, Vogel RL, Mount BE, Dalton ML. Impedance cardiography: the next vital sign technology? Chest (2003); 123: 2028-2033.
25. Wang JJ, Flewitt JA, Shrive NG, Parker KH, Tyberg JV. Systemic venous circulation. Waves propagating on a windkessel: relation of arterial and venous windkessels to systemic vascular resistance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2006); 290: H154-H162.
26. Weissler AM, Leonard JJ, Warren JV. Effects of posture and atropine on the cardiac output. J Clin Invest (1957); 36: 1656-1662.
27. Woltjer HH, Bogaard HJ, de Vries PM. The technique of impedance cardiography. Eur Heart J (1997); 18: 1396-1403.
28. Woltjer HH, Bogaard HJ, Scheffer GJ, Van Der Spoel HI, Huybregts MA, De Vries PM. Standardization of non-invasive impedance cardiography for assessment of stroke volume: comparison with thermodilution. Br J Anaesth (1996); 77: 748-752.
29. Zambrano SS, Spodick DH. Comparative responses to orthostatic stress in normal and abnormal subjects. Evaluation by impedance cardiography. Chest (1974); 65: 394-396.