Assessment of stroke volume index with three different bioimpedance algorithms: Lack of agreement compared to thermodilution

Intensive Care Medicine

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 735-739

  De Waal, Eric E C ^a   Konings, Maurits K ^a   Kalkman, Cor J ^a   Buhre, Wolfgang F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bioimpedance; Cardiac output; Coronary artery bypass graft; Method comparison; Stroke volumeindex; Transpulmonary thermodilution

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BIOIMPEDANCE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; EXTUBATION; FEMALE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART STROKE VOLUME INDEX; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL PATIENT; THERMODILUTION;

ALGORITHMS; CARDIOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE VOLUME; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 43349098041     PISSN: 03424642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-007-0938-y     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Swan HJ, Ganz W, Forrester J, Marcus H, Diamond G, Chonette D (1970) Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med 283:447-451
2. Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M, Ashcroft J, Jones CM, Elbourne D, Brampton W, Williams D, Young D, Rowan K, PAC-Man study collaboration (2005) Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 366:472-477
3. Richard C, Warszawski J, Anguel N, Deye N, Combes A, Barnoud D, Boulain T, Lefort Y, Fartoukh M, Baud F, Boyer A, Brochard L, Teboul JL, French Pulmonary Artery Catheter Study Group (2003) Early use of the pulmonary artery catheter and outcomes in patients with shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 290:2713-2720
4. Peters SG, Afessa B, Decker PA, Schroeder DR, Offord KP, Scott JP (2003) Increased risk associated with pulmonary artery catheterization in the medical intensive care unit. J Crit Care 18:166-171
5. Jensen L, Yakimets J, Teo KK (1995) A review of impedance cardiography. Heart Lung 24:183-193
6. Raaijmakers E, Faes TJ, Scholten RJ, Goovaerts HG, Heethaar RM (1999) A meta-analysis of three decades of validating thoracic impedance cardiography. Crit Care Med 27:1203-1213
7. Thangathurai D, Charbonnet C, Roessler P, Wo CC, Mikhail M, Yoahida R, Shoemaker WC (1997) Continuous intraoperative noninvasive cardiac output monitoring using a new thoracic bioimpedance device. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 11:440-444
8. Spiess BD, Patel MA, Soltow LO, Wright IH (2001) Comparison of bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output during cardiac surgery: evaluation of a second-generation bioimpedance device. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 15:567-573
9. Sageman WS, Riffenburgh RH, Spiess BD (2002) Equivalence of bioimpedance and thermodilution in measuring cardiac index after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 16:8-14
10. Young JD, McQuillan P (1993) Comparison of thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution for the measurement of cardiac index in patients with severe sepsis. Br J Anaesth 70:58-62
11. Doering L, Lum E, Dracup K, Friedman A (1995) Predictors of between-method differences in cardiac output measurement using thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution. Crit Care Med 23:1667-1673
12. Buhre W, Weyland A, Kazmaier S, Hanekop GG, Baryalei MM, Sydow M, Sonntag H (1999) Comparison of cardiac output assessed by pulse-contour analysis and thermodilution in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 13:437-440
13. Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson RP, Witsoe DA, Mattson RH (1966) Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerospace Med 37:1208-1212
14. Bernstein DP (1986) A new stroke volume equation for thoracic electrical bioimpedance: theory and rationale. Crit Care Med 14:904-909
15. Wang Y, Haynor DR, Kim Y (2001) A finite-element study of the effects of electrode position on the measured impedance change in impedance cardiography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48:1390-1401
16. Critchley LA, Critchley JA (1999) A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 15:85-91
17. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet I:307-310
18. Kauppinen PK, Hyttinen JA, Malmivuo JA (1998) Sensitivity distributions of impedance cardiography using band and spot electrodes analyzed by a three-dimensional computer model. Ann Biomed Eng 26:694-702
19. Raaijmakers E, Faes TJ, Goovaerts HG, Meijer JH, de Vries PM, Heethaar RM (1998) Thoracic geometry and its relation to electrical current distribution: consequences for electrode placement in electrical impedance cardiography. Med Biol Eng Comput 36:592-597
20. Konings MK, Bouma CJ, Mali WP, Viergever MA (1997) 2D Intravascular EIT using a non-iterative, non-linear reconstruction algorithm. Lecture Notes Comput Sci 1230:57-70