The Outer Limits of Article 28 EC: Purely Internal Situations and the Development of the Court’s Approach through the Years

The Outer Limits of European Union Law

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 197-223

  Tryfonidou, Alina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79851475702     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. P Oliver and S Enchelmaier, ‘Free movement of goods: recent developments in the case law’, (2007) 44 CML Rev 649
2. JHU D’Oliveira, ‘Is Reverse discrimination still permissible under the Single European Act?’ in Forty years on: The Evolution of Postwar Private International Law in Europe: symposium in celebration of the 40th anniversary of the Centre of Foreign Law and Private International Law, University of Amsterdam, on 27 October 1998 (Deventer, Kluwer, 1990) 73–5.
3. D O’Keeffe and A Bavasso, ‘Four freedoms, one market and national competence: in search of a dividing line’ in D O’Keeffe and A Bavasso, Liber Amicorum in Honour of Lord Slynn of Hadley: Judicial Review in European Union Law (The Hague/London/Boston, Kluwer, 2000), at 554–5.
4. K Mortelmans, ‘Towards convergence in the application of the rules on free movement and on competition?’, (2001) 38 CML Rev 613, at 631.
5. P Oliver and W-H Roth, ‘The internal market and the four freedoms’, (2004) 41 CML Rev 407, at 431
6. M Poiares Maduro, We the Court: The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1998), 154–9.
7. D Chalmers, ‘Free Movement of goods within the European Community: An unhealthy addiction to Scotch Whisky?’, (1993) 42 ICLQ 269
8. J Steiner, ‘Drawing the line: Uses and abuses of Article 30 EEC’, (1992) 29 CML Rev 749
9. E White, ‘In search of the limits to Article 30 of the EEC Treaty’, (1989) 26 CML Rev 235.
10. J Weiler, ‘The Constitution of the Common Market Place: Text and Context in the Evolution of the Free Movement of Goods’, in P Craig and G De Búrca, The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999) 371–2.
11. C Barnard, ‘Fitting the remaining pieces into the goods and persons jigsaw’ (2001) 26 EL Rev 35, at 42.
12. A Tryfonidou, ‘Was Keck a half-baked solution after all?’ (2007) 34(2) Legal Issues of Economic Integration 167
13. G Davies, EU Internal Market Law (London, Cavendish, 2003) 172.
14. V Hatzopoulos and TU Do, ‘The case law of the ECJ concerning the free provision of services: 2000–2005’, (2006) 43 CML Rev 923, at 925–6.
15. P Oliver, Free Movement of Goods in the European Community (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2003) 146–54
16. A Dawes, ‘Importing and exporting poor reasoning: worrying trends in relation to the case law on the free movement of goods’, (2007) 8(8) German Law Journal 761, at 770–72.
17. M Poiares Maduro, ‘The Scope of European Remedies: The Case of Purely Internal Situations and Reverse Discrimination’ in Kilpatrick, Novitz and Skidmore (eds), The Future of European Remedies (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2000), 122
18. SL Kaleda, ‘Extension of the preliminary rulings procedure outside the scope of Community law: “The Dzodzi line of cases”’, European Integration online Papers (EIoP), Vol 4, No 11, 19 October 2000 available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000–011a.htm
19. C Barnard and E Sharpston, ‘The changing face of article 177 references’, (1997) 34 CML Rev 1113, at 1128–33.
20. C Ritter, ‘Purely Internal situations, reverse discrimination, Guimont, Dzodzi and Article 234’, (2006) 31(5) EL Rev 690
21. G Davies, ‘Can selling arrangements be harmonized’, (2005) 30(3) EL Rev 371, at 380
22. S Weatherill, ‘Regulating the Internal Market: Result orientation in the Court of Justice’, (1994) 19(1) EL Rev 55
23. C Barnard, The Substantive Law of the EU: The Four Freedoms (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007), 600–604.
24. G Davies, ‘The Services Directive: extending the country of origin principle and reforming public administration’, (2007) 32(2) EL Rev 232, 241–3.
25. S Weatherill, ‘Harmonisation: How Much, How Little?’, (2005) European Business Law Review 533.