Spatial planning procedures and property prices: The role of expectations

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 100, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 77-86

  Cotteleer, Geerte ^a   Peerlings, Jack H M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Hedonic pricing; Highway externalities; Property prices; Spatial planning

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; HOUSING;

CLOSE PROXIMITY; COMPENSATION SCHEME; CONSTRUCTION PLAN; HEDONIC PRICING; HIGHWAY EXTERNALITIES; NETHERLANDS; PROPERTY PRICES; SPATIAL PLANNING;

COSTS;

DECISION MAKING; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING; LAND USE PLANNING; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; PROPERTY MARKET;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 79751533633     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models 1988, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NL.
2. Anselin L. Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers, and spatial econometrics. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 2003, 26(2):153-166.
3. Bae C.H.C., Sandlin G., Bassok A., Kim S. The exposure of disadvantaged populations in freeway air-pollution sheds: a case study of the Seattle and Portland regions. Environ. Plann. B 2007, 34:154-170.
4. Bowman T., Thompson J., Colletti J. Valuation of open space and conservation features in residential subdivisions. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90:321-330.
5. Cassel E., Mendelsohn R. The choice of functional forms for hedonic price equations: comment. J. Urban Econ. 1985, 18(2):135-142.
6. Cho S.-H., Clark C.D., Park W.M., Kim S.G. Spatial and temporal variation in the housing market values of lot size and open space. Land Econ. 2009, 85(1):51-73.
7. Clark D.E. Externality effects on residential property values: the example of noise disamenities. Growth Change 2006, 37(3):460-488.
8. Cropper M.L., Deck L.B., McConnell K.E. On the choice of functional form for hedonic price functions. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1988, 70(4):668-675.
9. Donovan G.H., Butry D.T. Trees in the city: valuing street trees in Portland, Oregon. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 94(2):77-83.
10. Donovan G.H., Champ P.A., Butry D.T. Wildfire risk and housing prices: a case study from Colorado Springs. Land Econ. 2007, 83(2):217-233.
11. Farber S. Survey. Undesirable facilities and property values: a summary of empirical studies. Ecol. Econ. 1998, 24:1-14.
12. Geoghegan J. The value of open spaces in residential land use. Land Use Policy 2002, 19(1):91-98.
13. Hughes W.T.J., Sirmans C.F. Traffic externalities and single-family house prices. J. Reg. Sci. 1992, 32(4):487-500.
14. Ihlanfeldt K.R., Taylor L.O. Externality effects of small-scale hazardous waste sites: evidence from urban commercial property markets. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2004, 47(1):17-139.
15. Irwin E.G., Bockstael N.E. The problem of identifying land use spillovers: measuring the effects of open space on residential property values. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2001, 83(3):698-704.
16. Jim C.Y., Chen W.Y. Value of scenic views: hedonic assessment of private housing in Hong Kong. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2009, 91:226-234.
17. Kelejian H.H., Prucha I.R. A generalized moments estimator for the autoregressive parameter in a spatial model. Int. Econ. Rev. 1999, 40(2):509-533.
18. Kestens Y., Theriault M., Des Rosiers F. The impact of surrounding land use and vegetation on single-family house prices. Environ. Plann. B 2004, 31(4):539-567.
19. Kim K.S., Park S.J., Kweon Y.-J. Highway traffic noise effects on land price in an urban area. Transport. Res. D: Tr. E 2007, 12:275-280.
20. Lake I.R., Lovett A.A., Bateman I.J., Day B.H. Improving land compensation procedures via GIS and hedonic pricing. Environ. Plann. C 2000, 18:681-696.
21. Lee S.-W., Taylor P.D., Hong S.-K. Moderating effect of forest cover on the effect of proximity to chemical facilities on property values. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 86:171-176.
22. LeSage, J.P., Fischer, M.M., 2007. Spatial growth regressions: model specification, estimation and interpretation. Paper presented at The First World Conference of the Spatial Econometrics Association, Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, UK, 11-14 July 2007.
23. Lexius, 2010. Wet Op De Ruimtelijke Ordening, Artikel 6.2. Available at: (accessed 07.07.10). http://lexius.nl/wet-ruimtelijke-ordening/artikel6.2.
24. LUMOS consortium, 2002. Land Use Scanner. Available at: (accessed 07.07.10). http://www.objectvision.nl/geodms/downloads/LUS/LUS_DPUK.htm.
25. Luttik J. The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2000, 48:161-167.
26. Nicholls S., Crompton J.L. The impact of a golf course on residential property values. J. Sport Manage. 2007, 21(4):555-570.
27. Pace R.K., Barry R., Clapp J.M., Rodriquez M. Spatiotemporal autoregressive models of neighborhood effects. J. Real Estate Financ. 1998, 17(1):15-33.
28. Palmquist R.B., Roka F.M., Vukina T. Hog operations, environmental effects, and residential property values. Land Econ. 1997, 73(1):114-124.
29. Rasmussen D.W., Zuehlke T.W. On the choice of functional form for hedonic price functions. Appl. Econ. 1990, 22(4):431-438.
30. Ready R.C., Abdalla C.W. The amenity and disamenity impacts of agriculture: estimates from a hedonic pricing model. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2005, 87(2):314-326.
31. Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J. Polit. Econ. 1974, 82(1):34-55.
32. Smith V.K., Poulos C., Kim H. Treating open space as an urban amenity. Resour. Energ. 2002, 24(1-2):107-129.
33. Spalatro F., Provencher B. An analysis of minimum frontage zoning to preserve lakefront amenities. Land Econ. 2001, 77(4):469-481.
34. Statistics Netherlands Wijk En Buurtgegevens 1995-2006, (accessed 07.07.10). http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/dossiers/nederland-regionaal/publicaties/geografische-data/archief/2010/2010-wijk-en-buurtkaart-2009.htm.
35. Statistics Netherlands, 2003. Bestand Bodemgebruik. Available at: (accessed 07.07.10). http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/natuur-milieu/publicaties/geografische-data/archief/2007/2008-geografische-data-bestand-bodemgebruik-2003.htm.
36. Taylor L.O. The hedonic method. A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation 2003, 331-394. Kluwer Academic Publishers. P.A. Champ, K.J. Boyle, T.C. Brown (Eds.).
37. Tyrvainen L. The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1997, 37(3-4):211-222.
38. Tyrvainen L., Miettinen A. Property prices and urban forest amenities. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2000, 39(2):205-223.
39. Wu J.J. Environmental amenities and the spatial pattern of urban sprawl. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2001, 83(3):691-697.
40. Wu J.J., Adams R.M., Plantinga A.J. Amenities in an urban equilibrium model: residential development in Portland, Oregon. Land Econ. 2004, 80(1):19-32.
41. Zhang C.P., Murayama Y. Testing local spatial autocorrelation using K-order neighbours. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2000, 14(7):681-692.