Words fail us: How academics view language and ideas in higher education research

International Journal for Academic Development

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 47-59

  Green, David A ^a  

^a SEATTLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79751517297     PISSN: 1360144X     EISSN: 14701324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13601440903529901     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aitchison, C., & Lee, A. (2006). Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 265-278.
2. Andresen, L.W. (2000). Teaching development in higher education as scholarly practice: A reply to Rowland et al. 'Turning academics into teachers?'. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 23-31.
3. Andreski, S. (1972). Social sciences as sorcery. London: André Deutsch.
4. Becher, T., & Trowler, P.R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: SRHE/Open University Press.
5. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1994). Introduction: Language and relationship to language in the teaching situation. In P. Bourdieu, J.-C. Passeron, & M. de Saint Martin (Eds.), Academic discourse: Linguistic misunderstanding and professorial power. (R. Teese, Trans.) (pp. 1-34). Cambridge: Polity Press. (Original work published 1965)
6. Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C., & de Saint Martin, M. (Eds) (1994). Academic discourse: Linguistic misunderstanding and professorial power. (R. Teese, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press. (Original work published 1965)
7. Brew, A. (2003). The future of research and scholarship in academic development. In Eggins, H., & Macdonald, R. (Eds.), The scholarship of academic development (pp. 165-181). Buckingham, UK: SRHE/Open University Press.
8. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Chambers, E., & Northedge, D. (1999). Disciplinary differences and commonalities across the humanities, arts and social sciences. In C. Rust (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 7th international symposium on improving student learning through the disciplines (pp. 157-167). Oxford, UK: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
10. Clyne, M. (1991). The sociocultural dimension: The dilemma of the German-speaking scholar. In H. Schröder (Ed.), Subject-oriented texts: Languages for special purposes and text theory (pp. 49-67). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
11. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Woodstock, NY: Overlook Press.
12. Green, D. (2008, June). Border control: Does scholarship keep academic 'migrants' out? Paper presented at the 2008 conference of the International Consortium for Educational Development. Salt Lake City, UT.
13. Green, D.A. (2009). New academics' perceptions of the language of teaching and learning: Identifying and overcoming linguistic barriers. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(1), 33-45.
14. Harland, T., & Staniforth, D. (2003). Academic development as academic work. International Journal for Academic Development, 8(1-2), 25-35.
15. Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G.J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Hudson, R.A. (1980). Sociolinguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Kahn, P. (2003). Developing professional expertise in staff and educational development. In P. Kahn & D. Baume (Eds.), A guide to staff and educational development (pp. 212-226.). London: Kogan Page.
18. Land, R. (2004). Educational development: Discourse, identity and practice. Maidenhead, UK: SRHE/Open University Press.
19. Macdonald, R. (2003). Developing a scholarship of academic development: setting the context. In H. Eggins & R. Macdonald (Eds.), The scholarship of academic development (pp. 1-10). Buckingham, UK: SRHE/Open University Press.
20. MacDonald, S.P. (1994). Professional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
21. Manathunga, C. (2006). Doing educational development ambivalently: Applying post-colonial metaphors to educational development? International Journal for Academic Development, 11(1), 19-29.
22. Pascal, B. (1952). Letter XVI. The provincial letters (T. M'Crie, Trans.) (pp. 127-140). Chicago, IL: Encyclopædia Britannica. (Original work published 1656)
23. Rowland, S. (2003). Academic development: A practical or theoretical business? In H. Eggins & R. Macdonald (Eds.), The scholarship of academic development (pp. 13-22). Buckingham, UK: SRHE/Open University Press.
24. Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009). Significant conversations and significant networks: Exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 547-559.
25. Smith, E.T. (2003). Changes in faculty reading behaviors: The impact of electronic journals on the University of Georgia. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(3), 162-168.
26. Sokal, A.D. (1996). Transgressing the boundaries: Toward a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text, 46-47, 217-252.
27. Sokal, A.D., & Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern intellectuals' abuse of science. New York: Picador.
28. Tooley, J., & Darby, D. (1998). Educational research: A critique. London: Ofsted.
29. Trudgill, P. (2000). Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society. London: Penguin.
30. Wareing, S. (2004). It ain't what you say, it's the way that you say it: An analysis of the language of educational development. Educational Developments, 5(2), 9-11.
31. Webb, G. (1996). Theories of staff development: Development and understanding. International Journal for Academic Development, 1(1), 63-69.
32. Woods Quinn, J. (1994). If it catches my eye: A report of faculty pedagogical reading habits. Innovative Higher Education, 19(1), 53-66.