Disciplines, discourse and Orientalism: The implications for postgraduate certificates in learning and teaching in higher education

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 917-928

  Wareing, Shân ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79751512582     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075070902929519     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barnett, R. 1988. Limits to academic freedom. In Academic freedom and responsibility, ed. M. Tight. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
2. Barnett, R. 1994. The limits of competence. Buckingham: Open University Press.
3. Barnett, R. 2000. Realizing the university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
4. Bauer, H. 1990. Barriers against interdisciplinarity: Implications for studies of science, technology, and society (STS). Science, Technology and Human Values 15, no. 1: 105–19.
5. Becher, T., and P. Trowler. 2001. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of the disciplines. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.
6. Biggs, J. 1999. Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
7. Biglan, A. 1973. The characteristics of subject matter in different scientific areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 57, no. 3: 204–13.
8. Bloom, B., ed. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
9. Brew, A. 2003. Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquirybased teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development 22, no. 1: 3–18.
10. Bullock, A., and S. Trombley, eds. 1999. The new Fontana dictionary of modern thought. 3rd ed. London: HarperCollins.
11. CreativePro.com. http://www.creativepro.com/node/62681, entry by M. Shearer, 6 May 2008 (accessed 12 March 2009).
12. Davies, A. 2003. Writing learning outcomes and assessment criteria in art and design. http://www.arts.ac.uk/docs/cltad_learningoutcomes.pdf (accessed 6 September 2007).
13. Gibbons, M. 1998. Higher education relevance in the 21st century. Washington DC: World Bank.
14. Gibbs, G. 2000. Are the pedagogies of the disciplines really different? In Improving student learning through the disciplines. Proceedings of 1999 7th Improving Student Learning Conference. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
15. Gosling, D. 2001. Educational development units in the UK: What are they doing five years on? International Journal for Academic Development 6, no. 1: 74–90.
16. Gosling, D. 2008. Educational development in the United Kingdom. Report for the Heads of Educational Development. http://www.hedg.ac.uk/documents/index.html (accessed 12 March 2009).
17. Higher Education Academy. 2006. The UK Professional Standards Framework for Teaching and Supporting Learning in Higher Education. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/ourwork/professional/ProfessionalStandardsFramework.pdf (accessed 12 March 2009).
18. Huber, M. 2000. Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching: Reflections on the Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. In Improving Student learning through the disciplines. Proceedings of 1999 7th Improving Student Learning Conference. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
19. Jenkins, A. 1996. Discipline-based educational development. International Journal for Academic Development 1, no. 1: 50–62.
20. Jenkins, A., and S. Burkill. 2004. The generic meets the discipline. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ourwork/professional/snas (accessed 11 August 2008).
21. Kimball, R. 2004. The two cultures today. The New Criterion 12, no. 6. http://newcriterion.com:81/archive/12/feb94/cultures.htm (accessed 6 September 2007).
22. Knights, B. 2008. Discipline-based pedagogic research. English in Higher Education. London: Teaching and Learning Research Programme. http://www.tlrp.org/capacity/rm/wt/knights (accessed 6 January 2009).
23. Knowles, M. 1990. The adult learner: A neglected species. 4th ed. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
24. Kolb, D. 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25. Manathunga, C. 2006. Doing educational development ambivalently: Applying post-colonial metaphors to educational development? International Journal for Academic Development 11, no. 1: 19–29.
26. Marton, F., and R. Säljö. 1976. On qualitative differences in learning – 2: Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology 46: 115–27.
27. McWilliam, E. 2002. Against professional development. Journal of Educational Philosophy and Theory 34, no. 3: 289–99.
28. Meyer, J., and R. Land. 2005. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. 2: Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education 49, no. 3: 373–88.
29. O’Loughlin, R. 2008. The relationship between pedagogical and discipline-specific research methods: Critical perspectives. Discourse: Learning and Teaching in Philosophical and Religious Studies 7, no. 2: 67–120.
30. Perry, W.G. 1970. Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
31. Quality Assurance Agency Subject Benchmark Statement for Classics. 2007. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/benchmark/statements/Classics.asp (accessed 13 August 2008).
32. Quality Assurance Agency Subject Benchmark Statement for History. 2007. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/benchmark/statements/History07.asp (accessed 13 August 2008).
33. Quality Assurance Agency Subject Benchmark Statement for Theology and Religious Studies. 2007. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/benchmark/statements/Theology.asp (accessed 13 August 2008).
34. Redish, E.F. 1996. Discipline-based education and education research: The case of physics. http://www.physics.umd.edu/perg/papers/redish/nas/nas.htm (accessed 13 August 2008).
35. Rowland, S. 2002. Overcoming fragmentation in professional life: The challenge for academic development. Higher Education Quarterly 56, no. 1: 52–64.
36. Rust, C., ed. 2000. Improving student learning through the disciplines. Proceedings of 1999 7th Improving Student Learning Conference. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
37. Said, E. 2003. Orientalism: Western conceptions of the Orient. 2nd ed. London: Penguin.
38. Schön, D. 1983. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action London: Temple Smith.
39. Snow, C.P. 1959/1993. The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Taylor, P. 1976. An interpretation of the quantification debate in British Geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers N.S. 1, no. 2: 129–42.
41. Trowler, P. 2008. Cultures and change in higher education. Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan.
42. Wareing, S. 2005. Discipline-specific professional development: Just branding? Educational Developments 6, no. 1: 12–15.
43. Wareing, S. 2006. Models of how students learn, both generically and in their subject: A closer look. Paper presented at the Staff and Educational Development Conference, May, in Birmingham.
44. Warwick Mathematics Institute. 2008. Postgraduate Certificate in Academic and Professional Practice, Mathematics and Statistics. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/maths/pcapp/ (accessed 14 August 2008).
45. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.