Analysing the relationship between indicators of landscape complexity and preference

Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 24-38

  Ode, Åsa ^a   Miller, David ^b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAND USE PLANNING; LANDSCAPE; SURVEY; VISUALIZATION;

EUROPE;

EID: 79751509176     PISSN: 02658135     EISSN: 14723417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/b35084     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Antrop M, 2004, "Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe" Landscape and Urban Planning 67 9-26
2. Appleton K, Lovett A, 2005, "GIS-based visualization of development proposals: reactions from planning and related professionals" Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 29 321-339
3. Bailey D, Herzog F, Augenstein I, Aviron S, Billeter R, Szerencsit E, Bauldry J, 2007, "Thematic resolution matters: indicators of landscape pattern for European agro-ecosystems" Ecological Indicators 7 692-707
4. Berlyne DE,1974, "The newexperimental aesthetics", in Studies in theNew ExperimentalAesthetics: StepsTowards an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation Ed. D E Berlyne (Hemisphere, Washington, DC) pp 1-25
5. Bishop I D, Ye WS, Karadaglis C, 2001, "Experiential approaches to perception response in virtual worlds" Landscape and Urban Planning 54 115-123
6. Bureau of Land Management, 1984 Visual ResourceManagement BLMManual Handbook H-8400 United States Department of Internal Affairs,Washington, DC
7. Carlson A, 1995, "Nature, aesthetic appreciation, and knowledge" The Journal of Aesthetic and Art Criticism 53 399-400
8. Council of Europe, 2003 Presentation of the European Landscape Convention (Council of Europe, Strasbourg)
9. Daniel T C, Meitner M J, 2001, "Representational validity of landscape visualizations: the effects of graphical realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest vistas" Journal of Environmental Psychology 21 61-72
10. Dockerty T, Lovett A, Sünnenberg G, Appleton K, Parry M, 2005, "Visualising the potential impacts of climate change on rural landscapes" Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 29 297-320
11. Dramstad W E, Fry G, Fjellstad WJ, Skar B, Helliksen W, Sollund M-L B, Tveit M S, Geelmuyden A K, Framstad E, 2001, "Integrating landscape-based valuesöNorwegian monitoring of agricultural landscapes" Landscape and Urban Planning 57 257-268
12. Dramstad WE, Tveit MS, Fjellstad WJ, Fry GLA, 2006, "Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure" Landscape and Urban Planning 78 465-474
13. Everitt B S, 2002 The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics 2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
14. Fry G, Tveit M S, Ode A, Velarde M D, 2009, "The ecology of visual landscapes: exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators" Ecological Indicators 9 33-947
15. Germino MJ, Reiners WA, Blasko B J, McLeod D, Bastian CT, 2001, "Estimating visual properties of Rocky Mountain landscape using GIS" Landscape and Urban Planning 53 71-83
16. Gobster P H, 1999, "An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management" Landscape Journal 18 54-64
17. Green DG, Klomp N, Rimmington G, Sadedin S, 2007 Complexity in Landscape Ecology (Springer, Berlin)
18. Gulinck G, Múgica M, de Lucio J V, Atauri J A, 2001, "A framework for comparative landscape analysis and evaluation based on land cover data, with an application in the Madrid region (Spain)" Landscape and Urban Planning 55 257-270
19. Hägerhäll C, 1999 The Experience of Pastoral Landscapes PhD thesis, Department of Landscape Architecture, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden
20. Kaplan R, Kaplan S, 1989 The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
21. Lausch A, Herzog F, 2002, "Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability" Ecological Indicators 2 3-15
22. McGarigal K, Cushman S A, Neel M C, Ene E, 2002 FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis for Categorical Maps University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, http://www.umass.edu/ landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
23. Moore-Colyer R, Scott A, 2005, "What kind of landscape do we want? Past, present and future perspectives" Landscape Research 30 501-523
24. Ode Å, Tveit M, Fry G, 2008, "Capturing landscape visual character using indicatorsötouching base with landscape aesthetic theory" Landscape Research 33 89-117
25. Ode Å, Fry G, Tveit M S, Messager P, Miller D, 2009, "Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference" Journal of Environmental Management 90 375-383
26. Ode Å, Hagerhall C, Sang N, 2010, "Analysing visual landscape complexity: theory and application" Landscape Research 35 111-131
27. Palmer J F, 2004, "Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts" Landscape and Urban Planning 69 201-218
28. Riitters K H, O'Neill R V, Hunsaker C T, Wickham J D, Yankee D H, Timmins S P, Jones K B, Jackson B L, 1995, "A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics" Landscape Ecology 10 23-29
29. Roth M, 2006, "Validating the use of Internet survey techniques in visual landscape assessmentö an empirical study from Germany" Landscape and Urban Planning 78 179-192
30. Sang N, 2008, "Return of the Stanford Bunnyödefinition, computation and application of visual topology", in Proceedings of GISRUK, Manchester, 2-4 April, 2008 http://www.unigis.org/ gisruk 2008/proceedings.htm
31. Sang N, Ode Å, Miller D, 2008, "Landscapemetrics and visual topology in the analysis of landscape preference" Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 35 504-520
32. Stamps A E I, 2003, "Advances in visual diversity and entropy" Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30 449-463
33. Swanwick C, 2002 Landscape Character Assessment, Guidance for England and Scotland Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh
34. Tveit M, Ode Å, Fry G, 2006, "Key concepts in a framework for analyzing visual landscape character" Landscape Research 31 229-255
35. van Eetvelde V, Antrop M, 2004, "Analyzing structural and functional changes of traditional landscapesötwo examples from Southern France" Landscape and Urban Planning 67 79-95
36. Wherrett J R, 1999, "Issues in using the Internet as a medium for landscape preference research" Landscape and Urban Planning 45 209-217