3D bone mineral density distribution and shape reconstruction of the proximal femur from a single simulated DXA image: An in vitro study

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 7623, Issue PART 1, 2010, Pages

  Whitmarsh, Tristan ^a,b   Humbert, Ludovic ^a,b   De Craene, Mathieu ^a,b   Del Río Barquero, Luis M ^c   Fritscher, Karl ^e   Schubert, Rainer ^e   Eckstein, Felix ^f   Link, Thomas ^g   Frangi, Alejandro F ^a,b,d  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b BIOMATERIALES Y NANOMEDICINA CIBER BBN   (Spain)

^c CETIR Centre Medic   (Spain)

^d INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSITY FOR HEALTH SCIENCES   (Austria)

^f PARACELSUS MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Osteoporosis; Reconstruction; Registration; Statistical Model

Indexed keywords

3-D SHAPE; BONE MINERAL DENSITY; CLINICAL ROUTINE; COMBINED MODEL; DATA SETS; DIGITALLY RECONSTRUCTED RADIOGRAPHS; DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FRACTURE RISKS; HIP FRACTURE; IN-VITRO; INTENSITY-BASED; LOW COSTS; LOW RADIATION; MEAN DENSITY; OSTEOPOROSIS; PLANAR IMAGES; PROXIMAL FEMUR; QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIES; RECONSTRUCTION; RECONSTRUCTION ACCURACY; RECONSTRUCTION METHOD; REGISTRATION; REGISTRATION PROCESS; SHAPE RECONSTRUCTION; STATISTICAL MODELS;

BONE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FRACTURE; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEMS; MEDICAL IMAGING; MINERALS; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK PERCEPTION; SILICATE MINERALS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 79751486428     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.844110     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. WHO Scientific Group, [Prevention and management of osteoporosis ], 921, World Health Organization Technical Report Series (2003).
2. Bras, A. L., Kolta, S., Soubrane, P., Skalli, W., Roux, C., and Mitton, D., "Assessment of Femoral Neck Strength by 3-Dimensional X-ray Absorptiometry," Journal of Clinical Densitometry 9(4), 425-430 (2006).
3. Langton, C. M., Pisharody, S., and Keyak, J. H., "Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image," Osteoporosis International 20, 455-461 (Mar. 2009).
4. Fritscher, K., Grünerbl, A., and Schubert, R., "3D image segmentation using combined shape-intensity prior models," International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 1, 341-350 (Apr. 2007).
5. Yao, J. and Taylor, R., "Assessing accuracy factors in deformable 2D/3D medical image registration using a statistical pelvis model," Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision 2003 2, 1329-1334 (Oct. 2003).
6. Ahmad, O.M., Ramamurthi, K.,Wilson, K. E., Engelke, K., Bouxsein, M., and Taylor, R. H., "3D structural measurements of the proximal femur from 2D DXA images using a statistical atlas," Medical Imaging 2009: Computer-Aided Diagnosis 7260(1), 726005, SPIE (2009).
7. Frangi, A., Rueckert, D., Schnabel, J., and Niessen, W., "Automatic construction of multiple-object three-dimensional statistical shape models: application to cardiac modeling," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 21(9), 1151-1166 (2002).
8. Cootes, T. F., Edwards, G. J., and Taylor, C. J., "Active Appearance Models," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 23(6), 681-685 (2001).
9. Rueckert, D., Aljabar, P., Heckemann, R., Hajnal, J., and Hammers, A., "Diffeomorphic registration using B-splines," Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4191, 702-709 (2006).
10. Yushkevich, P. A., Piven, J., Hazlett, H. C., Smith, R. G., Ho, S., Gee, J. C., and Gerig, G., "User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability," NeuroImage 31(3), 1116-1128 (2006).
11. Bookstein, F., "PrincipalWarps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11(6), 567-585 (1989).
12. Horn, J., "A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis," Psychometrika 30, 179-185 (June 1965).
13. Press, W., Flannery, B., Teukolsky, S., and Vetterling, W., [Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing], Cambridge University Press (Oct. 1992).
14. Burghardt, A., Kazakia, G., Link, T., and Majumdar, S., "Automated simulation of areal bone mineral density assessment in the distal radius from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography," Osteoporosis International 20, 2017-2024 (Dec. 2009).
15. Eckstein, F., Wunderer, C., Boehm, H., Kuhn, V., Priemel, M., Link, T. M., and Lochmüller, E. M., "Reproducibility and Side Differences of Mechanical Tests for Determining the Structural Strength of the Proximal Femur," Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 19(3), 379-385 (2004).
16. Kolta, S., Le Bras, A., Mitton, D., Bousson, V., De Guise, J. A., Fechtenbaum, J., Laredo, J. D., Roux, C., and Skalli, W., "Three- dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA): A method for reconstruction of human bones using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device," Osteoporosis International 16(8), 969-976 (2005).
17. Fritscher, K., Schuler, B., Link, T., Eckstein, F., Suhm, N., Hänni, M., Hengg, C., and Schubert, R., "Prediction of Biomechanical Parameters of the Proximal Femur Using Statistical Appearance Models and Support Vector Regression," Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2008 5241, 568-575 (2008).
18. Schuler, B., Fritscher, K. D., Kuhn, V., Eckstein, F., and Schubert, R., "Using a statistical appearance model to predict the fracture load of the proximal femur," Medical Imaging 2009: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Modeling 7261(1), 72610W, SPIE (2009).
19. Tuck, S. P., Pearce, M. S., Rawlings, D. J., Birrell, F. N., Parker, L., and Francis, R. M., "Differences in bone mineral density and geometry in men and women: the Newcastle Thousand Families Study at 50 years old," The British Journal of Radiology 78(930), 493-498 (2005).