Measuring party identification: Britain, Canada, and the United States

Political Behavior

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 5-22

  Blais, André ^a   Gidengil, Elisabeth ^b   Nadeau, Richard ^a   Nevitte, Neil ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Party identification; Question wording; Vote

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035538829     PISSN: 01909320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1017665513905     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bartle, John (1999). Focus groups and measures of party identification: an exploratory study. Typescript: University of Essex.
2. Brynin, Malcom, and Sanders, David (1997). Party identification, political preferences and material conditions: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. Party Politics 3: 53-77.
3. Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
4. Campbell, James E., Munro, Mary, Alford, John R., and Campbell, Bruce A. (1986). Partisanship and voting. In Samuel Long (ed.), Research in Micropolitics. Greenwich: JAI Press.
5. Charnock, David (1996). Question-wording effects on the measurement of nonpartisanship: evidence from Australia. Electoral Studies 15: 263-268.
6. Converse, Philip E., and Pierce, Roy E. (1987). Measuring partisanship. Political Methodology 11: 143-166.
7. Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, André, Nadeau, Richard, and Nevitte, Neil. (in press). The correlates and consequences of anti-partyism. Party Politics.
8. Green, Donald Philip, and Palmquist, Bradley (1990). Of artifacts and partisan instability. American Journal of Political Science 34: 872-902.
9. Greene, Steven (1999). Understanding party identification: a social identity approach. Political Psychology 20: 393-403.
10. Heath, Anthony, and Pierce, Roy (1992). It was party identification all along: question order effects on reports of party identification in Britain. Electoral Studies 11: 93-105.
11. Johnston, Richard (1992). Party identification measures in the Anglo-American democracies: a national survey experiment. American Journal of Political Science 36: 542-559.
12. Keith, Bruce, Magleby, David, Nelson, Candace, Orr, Elisabeth, Westlye, Mark, and Wolfinger, Raymond W. (1986). The partisan affinities of independent 'leaners.' British Journal of Political Science 16: 155-185.
13. Krosnick, Jon A., and Berent, Matthew K. (1993). Comparison of party identification and policy preferences: the impact of survey question format. American Journal of Political Science 37: 941-964.
14. Miller, Warren E. (1991). Party identification, realignment, and party voting: back to the basics. American Political Science Review 85: 557-568.
15. Owen, Diana, and Dennis, Jack (1996). Anti-partyism in the USA and support for Ross Perot. European Journal of Political Research 29: 383-400.
16. Petrocik, John (1974). An analysis of intransitivities in the index of party identification. Political Methodology 1: 31-47.
17. Rose, Richard, and McAllister, Ian (1990). The Loyalties of Voters: A Lifetime Learning Model. London: Sage.
18. Schickler, Eric, and Green, Donald P. (1997). The stability of party identification in western democracies: results from eight panel surveys. Comparative Political Studies 30: 450-483.
19. Tajfel, Henri, and Turner, John C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Stephen Worchel and William G. Austin (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
20. Weisberg, Herbert F. (1980). A multidimensional conceptualization of party identification. Political Behavior 2: 33-60.