Modelling small-scale dispersal of the great reed warbler acrocephalus arundinaceus in a fragmented landscape

Ardea

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 383-394

  Bosschieter, L ^a   Goedhart, P W ^a   Foppen, R P B ^b   Vos, C C ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b SOVON DUTCH CENTRE FOR FIELD ORNITHOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acrocephalus; Ecological distance; Fragmentation; Mark resight; Reed warbler

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONNECTIVITY; DISPERSAL; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; JUVENILE; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; MOVEMENT; SONGBIRD;

NETHERLANDS;

ACROCEPHALUS; ACROCEPHALUS ARUNDINACEUS; AVES;

EID: 79751480097     PISSN: 03732266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5253/078.098.0312     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Ahlering M.A. & Faaborg J. 2006. Avian habitat management meets conspecific attraction: if you build it, will they come? Auk 123: 301-312. (Pubitemid 43726148)
2. Arnason A.N. 1972. Parameter estimation for mark-recapture experiments on two populations subject to migration and death. Res. Pop. Ecol. 13: 97-113.
3. Arnason A.N. 1973. The estimation of population size, migration rates, and survival in a stratified population. Res. Pop. Ecol. 15: 1-8.
4. Baguette M., Petit S. & Quéva F. 2000. Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species within the same habitat network: consequences for conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 100-108.
5. Bélisle M., Desrochers A. & Fortin M.J. 2001. Influence of forest cover on the movements of forest birds: A homing experiment. Ecology 82: 1893-1904. (Pubitemid 32673790)
6. Bélisle M. & St. Clair C.C. 2001. Cumulative effects of barriers on the movements of forest birds. Conserv. Ecol. 5(2): 9.
7. Bensch S. & Hasselquist D. 1991. Territory infidelity in the polygynous Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus: the effect of variation in territory attractiveness. J. Anim. Ecol. 60: 857-871.
8. Bensch S., Hasselquist D. Nielsen B. & Hansson B. 1998. Higher fitness for philopatric than for immigrant males in a semiisolated population of Great Reed Warblers. Evolution 52: 877-883. (Pubitemid 28324514)
9. Bowne D.R. & Bowers M.A. 2004. Interpatch movements in spatially structured populations: a literature review. Landscape Ecol. 19: 1-20. (Pubitemid 38536918)
10. Bosschieter L. & Goedhart P.W. 2005. Gap crossing decisions by Reed Warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 20: 455-468.
11. Breslow N. E. & Clayton D.G. 1993. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88: 9-25.
12. Bright P. W 1998. Behaviour of specialist species in habitat corridors: arboreal dormice avoid corridor gaps. Anim. Behav. 56: 1485-1490.
13. Brooker L., Brooker M. & Cale P. 1999. Animal dispersal in fragmented habitat: measuring habitat connectivity, corridor use and dispersal mortality. Conserv. Ecol. 3 (1): 4. http:// www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art3/
14. Brown M. & Dinsmore J. J. 1986. Implications of marsh size and isolation for marsh bird management. J. Wildl. Manage. 50: 392-397.
15. Bullock J.M. & Clarke R.T. 2000. Long distance seed dispersal by wind: measuring and modelling the tail of the curve. Oecologia 124: 506-521.
16. Catchpole C.K. 1972. A comparative study of territory in the Reed Warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus and Sedge Warbler A. schoenobaenus. J. Zool. 166: 213-231.
17. Chardon J.P., Adriaensen F. & Matthysen E. 2003. Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure: a case study for the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.). Landscape Ecol. 18: 561-573. (Pubitemid 37436024)
18. Conrad K.F., Willson K.H., Harvey I.F., Thomas C.J. & Sherratt T.N. 1999. Dispersal characteristics of seven odonate species in an agricultural landscape. Ecography 22: 524-531. (Pubitemid 29451978)
19. Cooch E. & White G. (eds) 2010. Program MARK, "A gentle introduction". 9th edition, http://www.phidot.org/software/ mark/docs/book/.
20. Davies Z.G. & Pullin A.S. 2007. Are hedgerows effective corridors betreen fragments of woodland habitat? An evidencebased approach. Landscape Ecol. 22: 333-351.
21. Desrochers A. & Hannon S.J. 1997. Gap crossing decisions by forest songbirds during the post-fledging period. Conserv. Biol. 11: 1204-1210.
22. Diamond J.M. 1984. 'Normal' extinctions of isolated populations. In: Nitecki M. H. (ed.) Extinctions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 191-246.
23. Foppen R., ter Braak C.J.F., Verboom J. & Reijnen R. 1999. Dutch sedge warblers Acrocephalus schoenobaenes and WestAfrican rainfall: empirical data and simulation modelling show low population resilience in fragmented marshlands. Ardea 87: 113-127.
24. Foppen R.P.B. 2001. Bridging gaps in fragmented marshland, applying landscape ecology for bird conservation. PhD thesis, University of Wageningen.
25. Foppen R.P.B., Chardon J.P. & Liefveld W. 2000. Understanding the role of sink patches in source-sink metapopulations: Reed Warbler in an agricultural landscape. Conserv. Biol. 14: 1881-1892.
26. Foppen R.P.B. & Reijnen M.J.S.M. 1994. The effects of car traffic on breeding bird populations in woodland. II. Breeding dispersal of male willow warblers (Phylloscopus trochilus) in relation to the proximity of a highway. J. Appl. Ecol: 31: 95-101
27. Gobeil J.-F. & Villard M.-A. 2002. Permeability of three boreal forest landscape types to bird movements as determined from experimental translocations. Oikos 98: 447-458.
28. Graveland J. 1998. Reed die-back, water level management and the decline of the Great Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) in The Netherlands. Ardea 86: 187-201.
29. Greenwood P.J. & Harvey P.H. 1982. The natal and breeding dispersal of birds. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13: 1-21.
30. Hagemeijer W.J.M. & Blair M.J. (eds) 1997. The EBCC atlas of European breeding birds, their distribution and abandunce. Poyser, London.
31. Hanski I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 151-162.
32. Hanski I. 2001. Population dynamic consequences of dispersal in local populations and in metapopulations. In: Clobert J., Danchin E., Dhondt A. A. & Nichols J. D. (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 283-298.
33. Hanski I. & Thomas C.D. 1994. Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biol. Conserv. 68: 167-180.
34. Hanski I., Alho J. ft Moilanen A. 2000. Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in a metapopulation. Ecology 81: 239-251.
35. Hansson B., Bensch S. & Hasselquist D. 2002 a. Predictors of natal dispersal in Great Reed Warblers: results from small and large census areas. J. Avian Biol. 33: 311-314.
36. Hansson B., Bensch S. & Hasselquist D. 2003. Heritability of dispersal in the Great Reed Warbler. Ecol. Lett. 6: 290-294.
37. Hansson B., Bensch S., Hasselquist D. & Nielsen B. 2002b. Restricted dispersal in a long-distance migrant bird with patchy distribution, the Great Reed Warbler. Oecologia 130: 536-542. (Pubitemid 36072656)
38. Hestbeck J.B., Nichols J.D. & Malecki R.A. 1991. Estimates of movement and site fidelity using mark-resighting data of wintering Canada Geese. Ecology 72: 523-533.
39. Hill J.K., Thomas C.D. & Lewis O.T. 1996. Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 725-735.
40. IMSL (1997). IMSL Fortran Numerical Library. Fortran Subroutines for Mathematical Applications. Visual Numerics. Houston. USA (www.vni.com)
41. Lebreton J.-D., Burnham K. P., Clobert J. & Anderson D. R. 1992. Modelling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals. A unified approach with case studies. Ecol. Monograph. 62: 67-118.
42. Lebreton J.-D. & North Ph.M. (eds) 1993. Marked individuals in the study of bird population. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel.
43. Levins R. 1970. Extinctions. In: Gerstenhaber (ed.) Some mathematical questions in biology. Lectures on mathematics in the life sciences, Vol.2. The American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I, pp. 77-107.
44. Machtans C.S., Villard M.-A. & Hannon S.J. 1996. Use of riparian buffer strips as movement corridors by forest birds. Conserv. Biol. 10: 1366-1379.
45. Matthysen E., Adriaensen F. & Dhondt A.A. 1995. Dispersal distances of nuthatches Sitta europaea, in a highly fragmented forest habitat. Oikos 72: 375-381.
46. McCullagh P. & Neider J.A. 1989. Generalized linear models, second edition. Chapman and Hall, London.
47. Morton M.L., Wakamatsu M.W, Pereyra M.E. & Morton G.A. 1991. Postfledging dispersal, habitat inprinting and philopatry in a montane, migratory sparrow. Omis Scand. 22: 98-106.
48. Nathan R. & Muller-Landau H.C. 2000. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 278-285.
49. Noordwijk A.J. van 1995. On bias due to observer distribution in the analysis of data on natal dispersal in birds. J. Appl. Stat. 22: 683-694.
50. Opdam P. 1990. Dispersal in fragmented populations: the key to survival. In: Bunce R. G. H. & Howards D. C. (eds) Species dispersal in agricultural habitats. Belhaven Press, London, pp. 3-17.
51. Opdam P. 1991. Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation: a review of holarctic breeding bird studies. Landscape Ecol. 5: 93-106.
52. Opdam P., Foppen R., Reijnen R. & Schotman A. 1994. The landscape ecological approach in bird conservations: integrating the metapopulation concept into spatial planning. Ibis 137: 139-146.
53. Opdam P., Foppen R. & Vos C.C. 2001. Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol. 16: 767-779.
54. Opdam P., Verboom J. & Pouwels R. 2003. Landscape cohesion: an index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity. Landscape Ecol. 18: 113-126. (Pubitemid 36872649)
55. Paradis E., Baillie S.R., Sutherland W.J. & Gregory R.D. 1998. Patterns of natal and breeding dispersal in birds. J. Anim. Ecol. 67: 518-536.
56. Pither J. & Taylor P.D. 1998 An experimental assessment of landscape connectivity. Oikos 83: 166-174. (Pubitemid 28430971)
57. Ray N., Lehmann A. & Joly P. 2002. Modelling spatial distribution of amphibian populations: a GIS approach based on habitat matrix permeability. Biodiv. Conserv. 11: 2143-2165.
58. Ricketts T.H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Amer. Nat. 158: 97-99.
59. Saunders D.A. & Rebeira C.P. d. 1991. Values of corridors to avian populations in a fragmented landscape. In: Saunders D. A. and Hobbs R. J. (eds) Nature conservation 2: the role of corridors. Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton, pp. 221-240.
60. Schwarz C.J., Schweigen J.F. & Arnason A.N. 1993. Estimating migration rates using tag-recovery data. Biometrics 49: 177-193.
61. Skellam J.G. 1951. Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38: 196-218.
62. Soulé M. 1987. Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
63. Spendelow J.A., Nichols J.D., Nisbet I.C.T., Hays H., Cormons G.D., Burger J., Safina C., Hines J.E. & Gochfeld M. 1995. Estimating annual survival and movement rates of adults within a metapopulation of roseate terns. Ecology 76: 2415-2428. (Pubitemid 3013829)
64. St.Clair C.C., Bélisle M., Desrochers A. & Hannon S. 1998. Winter responses of forest birds to habitat corridors and gaps. Cons. Ecol. 2: 13. http://www.consecol.org/vol2/ iss2/art13/.
65. Stephens P.A. & Sutherland W.J. 1999. Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 401: 405.
66. Sutcliffe O.L., Bakkestuen V., Fry G. & Stabbetorp O.E. 2003. Modelling the benefits of farmland restoration: methodology and application to butterfly movement. Landscape and Urban Planning 63: 15-31. (Pubitemid 36317593)
67. van Dorp D. & Opdam P.F.M. 1987. Effects of patch size, isolation and regional abundance on forest bird communities. Landscape Ecol. 1: 59-73.
68. Verbeylen G., de Bruyn L., Adriaensen F. & Matthysen E. 2003. Does matrix resistance influence red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape? Landscape Ecol. 18: 791-305.
69. Vos C.C., Baveco H. & Grashof-Bokdam C.J. 2002. Corridors and species dispersal. In: Gutzwiller, K.J. (ed.) Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. Springer, New York, pp. 84-104.
70. Wiens J.A. 2001. The landscape context of dispersal. In: Clobert J., Danchin E., Dhondt A.A. & Nichols J.D. (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 96-109.