Heuristic evaluation and usability testing of a computerized patient-reported outcomes survey for headache sufferers

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 40-45

  Turner Bowker, Diane M ^a   Saris Baglama, Renee N ^a   Smith, Kevin J ^b   DeRosa, Michael A ^a   Paulsen, Christine A ^c   Hogue, Sarah J ^a  

^a Datacorp   (United States)

^b QualityMetric Incorporated   (United States)

^c Concord Evaluation Group ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

e health; headache; healthrelated quality of life; patient reported outcomes; technology; telehealth

Indexed keywords

EHEALTH; HEADACHE; HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIVES; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; TELEHEALTH;

HUMAN ENGINEERING; MEDICAL COMPUTING; NAVIGATION; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; SURVEYS; USABILITY ENGINEERING; USER INTERFACES;

HEURISTIC METHODS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; DATA COLLECTION; DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW ENGLAND; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 79751469232     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0114     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R, Katsarava Z, Lipton R, Scher A, Steiner T, Zwart JA. The global burden of headache: A documentation of prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia 2007;27:193-210. (Pubitemid 46354128)
2. Leonardi M, Steiner TJ, Scher AT, Lipton RB. The global burden of migraine: Measuring disability in headache disorders with WHO's Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). J Headache Pain 2005;6:429-440. (Pubitemid 43078769)
3. Brandes JL. Migraine and functional impairment. CNS Drugs 2009;23:1039-1045.
4. Buse DC, Rupnow MFT, Lipton RB. Assessing and managing all aspects of migraine: Migraine attacks, migraine-related functional impairment, common co-morbidities, and quality of life. Mayo Clinic Proc 2009;84:422-435.
5. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S, Diamond ML, Reed M. Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: Data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache 2001;41:646-657. (Pubitemid 32777747)
6. De Diego EV, Lantieri-Minet M. Recognition and management of migraine in primary care: Influence of functional impact measured by the headache impact test (HIT). Cephalalgia 2005;25:184-190.
7. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Simon D. Medical consultation for migraine: Results from the American Migraine Study. Headache 1998;38:91-96.
8. Lipton RB, Hahn SR, Cady RK, Brandes JL, Simons SE, Bain PA, Nelson MR. In office discussions of migraine: Results from the American Migraine Communication Study. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:1145-1151.
9. Buse DC, Lipton RB. Facilitating communication with patients for improved migraine outcomes. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2008;2:230-236.
10. Brandes JL. The migraine cycle: Patient burden of migraine during and between migraine attacks. Headache 2008;48:430-441. (Pubitemid 351517765)
11. StewartM, Brown JB, Donner A,McWhinney IR, Oates J, WestonWW, Jordan J. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 2000;49:796-804.
12. Holmes WF, MacGregor EA, Sawyer JP, Lipton RB. Information about migraine disability influences physician's perceptions of illness severity and treatment needs. Headache 2001;41:343-350. (Pubitemid 33728582)
13. Nielsen J. Usability engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc., 1993.
14. Molich R, Nielsen J. Improving a human-computer dialogue. Commun ACM 1990;33:338-348. (Pubitemid 20668781)
15. Gerhardt-Powals J. Cognitive engineering principles for enhancing human-computer performance. Int J Hum Comput Interact 1996;8: 189-211.
16. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B. How to score version 2 of the SF-12® health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated, 2002.
17. Turner-Bowker DM, Saris-Baglama RN, DeRosa MA, Maruish ME. The DYNHA headache impact test: A user's guide. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated, 2009.
18. Bjorner JB, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr. Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT™). Qual Life Res 2003;12:913-933. (Pubitemid 37386622)
19. Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, Bjorner JB, Ware JE Jr., Garber WH, Batenhorst A, Cady R, Dahlöf CG, Dowson A, Tepper S. A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: The HIT-6™. Qual Life Res 2003;12:963-974. (Pubitemid 37386625)
20. Turner-Bowker DM, Saris-Baglama RN, Derosa MA, Paulsen CA, Bransfield CP. Using qualitative research to inform the development of a comprehensive outcomes assessment for asthma. Patient 2009;2:1-14.
21. Dillman DA, Smythe JD. Design effects in the transition to web-based surveys. Am J Prev Med 2007;32:S90-S96. (Pubitemid 46634964)