Naturals and strivers: Preferences and beliefs about sources of achievement

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 460-465

  Tsay, Chia Jung ^a   Banaji, Mahzarin R ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Achievement; Expertise; Judgment and decision making; Naturalness bias; Social perception; Talent

Indexed keywords

EID: 79651471721     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ariely D., Norton M. How actions create-not just reveal-preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12(1):13-16.
2. Ariely D., Simonson I. Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2003, 13(2):113-123.
3. Chinander K., Schweitzer M. The input bias: The misuse of input information in judgments of outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2003, 91(2):243-253.
4. Darley J., Gross P. A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983, 44(1):20-33.
5. Dawes R. The ethical implications of Paul Meehl's work on comparing clinical versus actuarial prediction methods. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2005, 61(10):1245-1255.
6. Dweck C.S., Chiu C., Hong Y. Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry 1995, 6:267-285.
7. Epley N., Keysar B., Van Boven L., Gilovich T. Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 87(3):327-339.
8. Ericsson K.A., Krampe R.Th., Tesch-Römer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review 1993, 100(3):363-406.
9. Gilovich T., Vallone R., Tversky A. The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1985, 47:295-314.
10. Gladwell M. The quarterback problem. Paper presented at 2002 meeting of the American Psychological Association 2002.
11. Goldin C., Rouse C. Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of "blind" auditions on female musicians. The American Economic Review 2000, 90:715-741.
12. Greenwald A.G., McGhee D.E., Schwartz L.K. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 74:1464-1480.
13. Hsee C.K. Attribute evaluability and its implications for joint-separate evaluation reversals and beyond. Choices, Values and Frames. New York 2000, Cambridge University Press. D. Kahneman, A. Tversky (Eds.).
14. Hsee C., Loewenstein G., Blount S., Bazerman M. Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1999, 125(5):576-590.
15. Kruger J., Wirtz D., Van Boven L., Altermatt T. The effort heuristic. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2004, 40:91-98.
16. Pfeiffer S.I. Challenges and opportunities for students who are gifted: What the experts say. Gifted Child Quarterly 2002, 47:161-169.
17. Pfeiffer S.I. Serving the gifted student: Best practices as school psychology enters the 21st century. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Chicago 2002.
18. Richards J., Encel J., Shute R. The emotional and behavioural adjustment of intellectually gifted adolescents: A multi-dimensional, multi-informant approach. High Ability Studies 2003, 14:153-164.
19. Sedikides C., Ariely D., Olsen N. Contextual and procedural determinants of partner selection: Of asymmetric dominance and prominence. Social Cognition 1999, 17(2):118-139.
20. Subotnik R.F. Transforming elite level musicians into professional artists: A view of the talent development process at The Juilliard School. Beyond knowledge: Extracognitive facets in developing high ability 2003, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. L. Shavinina, M. Ferrari (Eds.).
21. Subotnik R.F. Developing young adolescent performers at Juilliard: An educational prototype for elite level talent development in the arts and sciences. Talent, resilience, and wisdom across the lifespan 2000, 249-276. Psychology Press, Hove, UK. C.F. Van Lieshout, P.G. Heymans (Eds.).
22. Terry A.W., Bohnenberger J.E. Service learning: Fostering a cycle of caring in our gifted youth. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education 2003, 15:23-32.
23. Van Boven L., Dunning D., Loewenstein G. Egocentric empathy gaps between owners and buyers: Misperceptions of the endowment effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 79(1):66-76.