In situ assessment of the velocity of carbon transfer by tracing 13C in trunk CO2 efflux after pulse labelling: Variations among tree species and seasons

New Phytologist

Volumn 190, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 181-192

  Dannoura, Masako ^a,b   Maillard, Pascale ^c,d   Fresneau, Chantal ^e,f   Plain, Caroline ^c,d   Berveiller, Daniel ^e,f   Gerant, Dominique ^c,d   Chipeaux, Christophe ^a   Bosc, Alexandre ^a   Ngao, Jérôme ^e,f   Damesin, Claire ^e,f   Loustau, Denis ^a   Epron, Daniel ^c,d  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^d LERFoB   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^f UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

Author keywords

Beech; Carbon isotopes; Oak; Phloem transport; Pine; Pulse labelling; Trunk respiration; Tuneable diode laser absorption spectroscopy

Indexed keywords

AIR TEMPERATURE; ANATOMY; ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON ISOTOPE; CONIFEROUS TREE; DECIDUOUS TREE; DIAMETER; ESTIMATION METHOD; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; GROWING SEASON; IN SITU TEST; ISOTOPIC COMPOSITION; PHLOEM; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEASONAL VARIATION; SOIL WATER; SPECIES DIVERSITY; VELOCITY;

CONIFERALES; FAGUS; FAGUS SYLVATICA; PINUS PINASTER; QUERCUS PETRAEA;

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; PLANT EXTRACT;

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BARK; BEECH; BIOMASS; CELL RESPIRATION; ISOTOPE LABELING; KINETICS; METABOLISM; OAK; PHLOEM; PINE; SEASON; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TEMPERATURE; TIME; TREE;

BIOMASS; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON ISOTOPES; CELL RESPIRATION; FAGUS; ISOTOPE LABELING; KINETICS; PHLOEM; PINUS; PLANT BARK; PLANT EXTRACTS; QUERCUS; SEASONS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; TREES;

EID: 79551711178     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03599.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bahn M, Janssens IA, Reichstein M, Smith P, Trumbore SE. 2010. Soil respiration across scales: towards an integration of patterns and processes. New Phytologist 186: 292-296.
2. 2 and its carbon isotope composition on a diurnal timescale? New Phytologist 182: 451-460.
3. 18O of leaf water and organic pools in a pine stand. Plant, Cell & Environment 30: 539-550.
4. Cannell GR, Dewar RC. 1994. Carbon allocation in trees: a review of concepts for modelling. Advances in Ecological Research 25: 59-104.
5. Canny MJ. 1975. Mass transfer. In: Zimmermann MH, Milburn JA, eds. Transport in plants I. Phloem transport. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 139-153.
6. 14C pulse-chase labeling technique. Global Change Biology 13: 466-477.
7. 2 flux in a Minnesota grassland. Plant and Soil 207: 77-86.
8. Curtis OF. 1936. The translocation of solutes in plants. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.
9. Damesin C, Ceschia E, Le Goff N, Ottorini J-M, Dufrêne E. 2002. Stem and branch respiration of beech: from tree measurements to estimations at the stand level. New Phytologist 153: 159-172.
10. Davidson EA, Belk E, Boone RD. 1998. Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Global Change Biology 4: 217-227.
11. Dawson TE, Mambelli S, Plamboeck AH, Templer PH, Tu KP. 2002. Stable isotopes in plant ecology. Annual Review of Ecology Systems 33: 507-559.
12. 13C is regulated by recent above ground weather conditions. Oecologia 143: 136-142.
13. 2 efflux in a beech forest: dependence on soil temperature and soil water content. Annales des Sciences Forestières 56: 221-226.
14. Fisher DB. 1990. Measurement of phloem transport rates by an indicator-dilution technique. Plant Physiology 94: 455-462.
15. Friedlingstein P, Joel G, Field CB, Fung IY. 1999. Toward an allocation scheme for global terrestrial carbon models. Global Change Biology 5: 755-770.
16. Gaumont-Guay D, Black TA, Barr AG, Jassal RS, Nesic Z. 2008. Biophysical controls on rhizospheric and heterotrophic components of soil respiration in a boreal black spruce stand. Tree Physiology 28: 161-171.
17. Geiger DR, Sovonick SA. 1970. Temporary inhibition of translocation velocity and mass transfer rate by petiole cooling. Plant Physiology 46: 847-849.
18. Gessler A, Rennenberg H, Keitel C. 2004. Stable isotope composition of organic compounds transported in the phloem of European beech - evaluation of different methods of phloem sap collection and assessment of gradients in carbon isotope composition during leaf-to-stem transport. Plant Biology 6: 1-10.
19. Gessler A, Tcherkez G, Peuke AD, Ghashghaie J, Farquhar GD. 2008. Experimental evidence for diel variations of the carbon isotope composition in leaf, stem and phloem sap organic matter in Ricinus communis. Plant, Cell & Environment 31: 941-953.
20. Giardina CP, Ryan MG, Binkley D, Fownes JH. 2003. Primary production and carbon allocation in relation to nutrient supply in a tropical experimental forest. Global Change Biology 9: 1438-1450.
21. Hammel HT. 1968. Measurement of turgor pressure and its gradient in the phloem of oak. Plant Physiology 43: 1042-1048.
22. Helfter C, Shephard JD, Martinez-Vilalta J, Mencuccini M, Hand DP. 2007. A noninvasive optical system for the measurement of xylem and phloem sap flow in woody plants of small stem size. Tree Physiology 27: 169-179.
23. Hepton CEL, Preston RD. 1960. Electron microscopic observations of the structure of sieve-connexions in the phloem of angiosperms and gymnosperms. Journal of Experimental Botany 11: 381-393.
24. Högberg P, Högberg MN, Gottlicher SG, Betson NR, Keel SG, Metcalfe DB, Campbell C, Schindlbacher A, Hurry V, Lundmark T et al. 2007. High temporal resolution tracing of photosynthate carbon from the tree canopy to forest soil microorganisms. New Phytologist 177: 220-228.
25. Högberg P, Nordgren A, Buchmann N, Taylor AFS, Ekblad A, Hogberg MN, Nyberg G, Ottosson-Lofvenius M, Read DJ. 2001. Large-scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil respiration. Nature 411: 789-792.
26. Högberg P, Read DJ. 2006. Towards a more plant physiological perspective on soil ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 549-554.
27. Hölttä T, Mencuccini M, Nikinmaa E. 2009. Linking phloem function to structure: analysis with a coupled xylem-phloem transport model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 259: 325-337.
28. Horwath WR, Pregitzer KS, Paul EA. 1994. 14C Allocation in tree-soil systems. Tree Physiology 14: 1163-1176.
29. Kodama N, Barnard R, Salmon Y, Weston C, Ferrio J, Holst J, Werner R, Saurer M, Rennenberg H, Buchmann N et al. 2008. Temporal dynamics of the carbon isotope composition in a Pinus sylvestris stand: from newly assimilated organic carbon to respired carbon dioxide. Oecologia 156: 737-750.
30. Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG. 1997. Physiology of woody plants. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.
31. Kuzyakov Y, Gavrichkova O. 2010. Time lag between photosynthesis and CO2 efflux from soil: a review of mechanisms and controls. Global Change Biology 16: 3386-3406.
32. Litton CM, Raich JW, Ryan MG. 2007. Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Global Change Biology 13: 2089-2109.
33. Lloyd J, Taylor JA. 1994. On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Functional Ecology 8: 315-323.
34. Magnani F, Grace J, Borghetti M. 2002. Adjustment of tree structure in response to the environment under hydraulic constraints. Functional Ecology 16: 385-393.
35. Magnani F, Mencuccini M, Grace J. 2000. Age-related decline in stand productivity: the role of structural acclimation under hydraulic constraints. Plant, Cell & Environment 23: 251-263.
36. 2 efflux recorded with a tunable diode laser spectrophotometer (TDLS). Plant and Soil 318: 137-151.
37. Mencuccini M, Hölttä T. 2010. The significance of phloem transport for the speed with which canopy photosynthesis and belowground respiration are linked. New Phytologist 185: 189-203.
38. Milburn JA. 1975. Pressure flow. In: Zimmermann MH, Milburn JA, eds. Transport in plants I. Phloem transport. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 328-353.
39. Minchin PEH, Lacointe A. 2005. New understanding on phloem physiology and possible consequences for modelling long-distance carbon transport. New Phytologist 166: 771-779.
40. 13C method of estimation of carbon allocation to roots in a young chestnut coppice. Plant, Cell & Environment 9: 735-739.
41. Mullendore DL, Windt CW, As HV, Knoblauch M. 2010. Sieve tube geometry in relation to phloem flow. The Plant Cell 22: 579-593.
42. Parthasarathy MV. 1975. Sieve-element structure. In: Zimmermann MH, Milburn JA, eds. Transport in plants I. Phloem transport. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 3-38.
43. Peuke AD, Rokitta M, Zimmermann U, Schreiber L, Haase A. 2001. Simultaneous measurement of water flow velocity and solute transport in xylem and phloem of adult plants of Ricinus communis over a daily time course by nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry. Plant, Cell & Environment 24: 491-503.
44. Peuke AD, Windt C, Van As H. 2006. Effects of cold-girdling on flows in the transport phloem in Ricinus communis: is mass flow inhibited? Plant, Cell & Environment 29: 15-25.
45. 2 pulse labelling of 20-year-old beech trees. Tree Physiology 29: 1433-1447.
46. 14C pulse labelling. Trees - Structure and Function 23: 611-621.
47. 2 efflux. New Phytologist 184: 950-961.
48. Sheehy JE, Mitchell PL, Durand J-L, Gastal F, Woodward FI. 1995. Calculation of translocation coefficients from phloem anatomy for use in crop models. Annals of Botany 76: 263-269.
49. Shigematsu Y. 1959. Studies on the structure of bark IV: microscopic structure of the bark of Pines (2). The scientific reports of Kyoto Prefectural University. Agriculture 11: 120-125.
50. Thompson MV. 2006. Phloem: the long and the short of it. Trends in Plant Science 11: 26-32.
51. Thompson MV, Holbrook NM. 2003. Application of a single-solute non-steady-state phloem model to the study of long-distance assimilate transport. Journal of Theoretical Biology 220: 419-455.
52. Thompson MV, Holbrook NM. 2004. Scaling phloem transport: information transmission. Plant, Cell & Environment 27: 509-519.
53. 11C from leaves of Helianthus, Heracleum, Nymphoides, Ipomoea, Tropaeolum, Zea, Fraxinus, Ulmus, Picea, and Pinus: comparative shapes and some fine structure profiles. Canadian Journal of Botany 57: 845-863.
54. Trockenbrodt M. 1994. Quantitative changes of some anatomical characters during bark developpementin Quercus robus, Ulmus glabra, Populus tremula and Betula pendula. IAWA Journal 15: 387-398.
55. Van Bel AJE. 2003. The phloem, a miracle of ingenuity. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 125-149.