Nanostructured bladder tissue replacements

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 134-145

  Chun, Young Wook ^a   Lim, Hojean ^b   Webster, Thomas J ^a   Haberstroh, Karen M ^a  

^a Brown University   (United States)

^b The College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTS; BLADDER TISSUE; CELL RESPONSE; FUTURE DIRECTIONS; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; NANO SCALE; NANO-STRUCTURED; NANOMATERIAL; NANOSTRUCTURED BIOMATERIALS; NANOSTRUCTURED POLYMERS; POLYMERIC SURFACES; PROTEIN INTERACTION; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SUBMICRON; SURFACE ENERGIES; SURFACE FEATURE; SYNTHETIC MATERIALS; SYNTHETIC POLYMERS;

ADHESION; BIOMATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

POLYMERS;

CALCIUM OXALATE; DNA; NANOMATERIAL; BIOMATERIAL;

BLADDER; BLADDER INJURY; BLADDER MUSCLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA METABOLISM; DNA SYNTHESIS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SMOOTH MUSCLE FIBER; UROTHELIUM; ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE; CYTOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PIG; PROCEDURES; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SURGERY; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELLS, CULTURED; HUMANS; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SWINE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; URINARY BLADDER;

EID: 79551701146     PISSN: 19395116     EISSN: 19390041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wnan.89     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Webster TJ. Nanomedicine: what's in a definition? Int J Nanomed 2006, 1:115-116.
2. Ferrari M. Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Cancer 2005, 5:161-171.
3. Vasir JK, Reddy MK, Labhasetwar VD. Nanosystems in drug targeting: opportunities and challenges. Curr Nanosci 2005, 1:47-64.
4. Khang D, Kim SY, Liu-Snyder P, Palmore GTR, Durbin SM, et al. Enhanced fibronectin adsorption on carbon nanotube/polu(carbonate) urethane: Independent role of surface nano-roughness and associated surface energy. Biomaterials 2007, 28:4756-4768.
5. Available at: (Accessed November 2009).
6. Morey AF, Rozanski TA. Genital and lower urinary tract trauma. In: Wein AJ, ed. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders Elsevier; 2007, [chapter 83].
7. Kiddoo DA, Carr MC, Dulczak S, Canning DA. Initial management of complex urological disorders: bladder exstrophy. Urol Clin North Am 2004, 31:417-426.
8. Snodgrass WT, Adams R. Initial urologic management of myelomeningocele. Urol Clin North Am 2004, 31:427-434.
9. Fleshner NE, Herr HW, Stewart AK, Murphy GP, Mettlin C, et al. The national cancer data base report on bladder carcinoma. Cancer 1996, 78:1505-1513.
10. Mitchell ME. Bladder augmentation in children: where have we been and where are we going?. BJU Int 2003, 92(suppl):1 29-34.
11. Gonzalez R, Ludwikowski B, Horst M. Determinants of success and failure of seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium. J Urol 2009, 182:1781-1785.
12. Filmer RB, Spencer JR. Malignancies in bladder augmentations and intestinal conduits. J Urol 1990, 143:671-678.
13. Soergel TM, Cain MP, Misseri R, Gardner TA, Koch MO, et al. Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder following augmentation cystoplasty for the neuropathic bladder. J Urol 2004, 172:1649-1651.
14. Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav A, Hoenig DM, Figenshau R, Clayman RV. Bladder wall substitution with synthetic and nonintestinal organic materials. J Uorl 1998, 159:628-637.
15. Zhang YY, Kropp BP, Moore P, Cowan R, Furness PD III, et al. Co-culture of bladder urothelial and smooth muscle cells on small intestinal submucosa (SIS): Potential applications for tissue engineering technology. J Urol 2000, 164:928.
16. Zhang Y, Frimberger D, Cheng EY, et al. Challenges in a larger bladder replacement with cell-seeded and unseeded small intestinal submucosa grafts in a subtotal cystectomy model. BJU Int 2006, 98:1100-1105.
17. Zhang Y, Kropp BP, Lin HK, et al. Bladder regeneration with cell-seeded small intestinal submucosa. Tissue Eng 2004, 10:181-187.
18. Kajbafzadeh AM, Payabvash S, Salmasi AH, et al. Time-dependent neovasculogenesis and regeneration of different bladder wall components in the bladder acellular matrix graft in rats. J Surg Res 2007, 139:189-202.
19. Feng Z, Matsumoto T, Nakamura T, et al. Measurements of the mechanical properties of contracted collagen gels populated with rat fibroblasts or cardiomyocytes. J Artif Organs 2003, 6:192-196.
20. Brown R, Wiseman M, Chuc C, et al. Ultrarapid engineering of biomimetic materials and tissues: fabrication of nano- and microstructures by plastic compression. Adv Funct Mater 2005, 15:1762-1770.
21. Neel E, Cheema U, Knowles J, et al. Use of multiple unconfined compression for control of collagen gel scaffold density and mechanical properties. Soft Matter 2006, 2:986-992.
22. Engelhardt EM, Stegberg E, Brown RA, Hubbell JA, Wurn FM, et al. Compressed collagen gel: a novel scaffold for human bladder cells. J Tissue Eng Reg Med 2009, 4:123-130.
23. Mooney DJ, Baldwin DF, Suh NP, Vacanti JP, Langer R. Novel approach to fabricate porous sponges of poly(d, l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) without the use of organic solvents. Biomaterials 1996, 17:1417-1422.
24. Harris LD, Kim BS, Mooney DJ. Open pore biodegradable matrices formed with gas foaming. J Biomed Mater Res 1998, 42:396-402.
25. Mikos AG, Thorsen AJ, Czerwonka LA, Bao Y, Langer R, et al. Preparation and characterization of poly(l-lactic acid) foams. Polymer 1994, 35:1069-1077.
26. Chen G, Ushida T, Tateishi T. Preparation of poly(l-lactic acid) and poly(dl-lactic-co-glycolic acid) foams by use of ice microparticulates. Biomaterials 2001, 22:2563-2567.
27. Thapa A, Webster TJ, Haberstroh KM. Polymers with nanodimensional surface features enhance bladder smooth muscle cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res 2003, 67A:1374-1383.
28. Pattison MA, Wurster S, Webster TJ, et al. Three-dimensional, nanostructured PLGA scaffolds for bladder tissue replacement applications. Biomaterials 2005, 26:2491-2500.
29. Chun YW, Khang D, Haberstroh KM, Martin K, Webster TJ. The role of polymer nano surface roughness and submicron pores for improving bladder urothelial cell density and inhibiting calcium oxalate stone formation. Nanotechnology 2009, 20:085104.
30. Khang D, Lu J, Yao C, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. The role of nanometer and sub-micron surface features on vascular and bone cell adhesion on titanium. Biomaterials 2008, 29:970-983.
31. Jung YC, Bhushan B. Contact angle, adhesion and friction properties of micro- and nanopatterned polymers for superhydrophobicity. Nantotechnology 2006, 17:4970-4980.
32. Wan Y, Yang J, et al. Cell adhesion on gaseous plasma modified poly-(l-lactide) surface under shear stress field. Biomaterials 2003, 24:3757-3764.
33. Lopes MA, Monteiro FJ, Santos JD, et al. Hydrophobicity, surface tension, and zeta potential measurements of glass-reinforced hydroxyapatite composites. J Biomed Mater Res 1999, 45:370-375.
34. Degasne I, Basle MF, Demais V, et al. Effects of roughness, fibronectin and vitronectin on attachment, spreading, and proliferation of human osteoblast-like cells (Saos-2) on titanium surfaces. Calcified Tissue Int 1999, 64:499-507.
35. Cartz L. Nondestructive Testing. Materials Park, OH: ASM International; 1995, 135-136.
36. Tugrul AB, Capillarity Effect Analysis for Alternative Liquid Penetrant Chemicals, NDT and E International, Volume 30 Number 1. Oxford England: Elsevier Science Ltd., 1997.
37. Hudson AE, Carmean N, Bassuk J. Extracellular matrix protein coatings for facilitation of urothelial cell attachment. Tissue Eng 2007, 13:2219-2225.
38. Falke G, Caffaratti J, Atala A. Tissue engineering of the bladder. World J Urol 2000, 18:36-43.
39. Atala A, Vacanti JP, Peters CA, Mandell J, Retik AB, et al. Formation of urothelial structures in vivo from dissociated cells attached to biodegradable polymer scaffolds in vitro. J Urol 1992, 148:658-662.
40. Hoque ME, Wong YS, Feng W, et al. Processing of PCL and PCL-based copolymers into 3D scaffolds, and their cellular responses. Tissue Eng Part A 2009, 15:3013-3024.
41. Sasmazel HT, Gumusderelioqlu M, et al. Comparison of cellular proliferation on dense and porous PCL scaffolds. Biomed Mater Eng 2008, 18:119-128.
42. Walles T. Bioartificial tracheal grafts: can tissue engineering keep its promise? Exp Review Med Devices 2004, 1:241-250.
43. Oberpenning F, Meng J, Yoo JJ, Atala A. De novo reconstitution of a functional mammalian urinary bladder by tissue engineering. Nat Biotech 1999, 17:149-155.
44. Atala A, Bauer SB, Soker S, Yoo JJ, Retik AB. Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty. Lancet 2006, 367:1241-1246.
45. Thapa A, Miller DC, Webster TJ, Haberstroh KM. Nanostructured polymers enhance bladder smooth muscle cell function. Biomaterials 2003, 24:2915-2926.
46. Pattison MA, Wurster S, Webster TJ, Haberstroh KM. Three-dimensional, nano-structured PLGA scaffolds for bladder tissue replacement applications. Biomaterials 2005, 26:2491-2500, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.011.
47. Kleinman HK, Philp D, Hoffman MP. Role of the extracellular matrix in morphogenesis. Curr Opin Biotech 2003, 14:526-532.
48. Cooke MJ, Philips SR, Shah DSH, Athey D, Lakey JH, Przyborski SA. Enhanced cell attachment using a novel cell culture surface presenting functional domains from extracellular matrix proteins. Cytotechnology 2008, 56:71-79.
49. Baker SC, Atkin N, Gunning PA, Granville N, Wilson K, et al. Characterisation of electrospun polystyrene scaffolds for three-dimensional in vitro biological studies. Biomaterials 2006, 27:3136-3146.
50. Harringon DA, Sharma AK, Erickson BA, Cheng EY. Bladder tissue engineering through nanotechnology. World J Urol 2008, 26:315-322.
51. McManus M, Boland E, Sell S, Bowen W, Koo H, et al. Electrospun nanofiber fibrinogen for urinary tract tissue reconstruction. Biomed Mater 2007, 2:257-262.
52. Chun YW, Webster TJ. The role of nanomedicine in growing tissues. Ann Biomed Eng 2009, 37:2034-2047.
53. Silva G, Czeisler C, Neice K, Beniash E, Harrington DA, et al. Selective differentiation of neural progenitor cells by high-epitope density nanoWbers. Science 2004, 303:1352-1357.
54. Hartgerink JD, Beniash E, Stupp SI. Peptide-amphiphile nanofibers: a versatile scalfold for the preparation of self-assembling materials. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:5133-5138.
55. Beqaj SH, Donovan JL, Lu DB, Harrington DA, Alpert SA, et al. Role of basic Fibroblast growth factor in the neuropathic bladder phenotype. J Urol 2005, 174:1699-1703.
56. Imamura M, Kanematsu A, Yamamoto S, Kimura Y, Kanatani I, et al. Basic Fibroblast growth factor modulates proliferation and collagen expression in urinary bladder smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2007, 293:F1007-F1017.