A process model of academic entrepreneurship

Business Horizons

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 153-161

  Wood, Matthew S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic entrepreneurship; Commercialization process; Technology commercialization; Technology transfer

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551685698     PISSN: 00076813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2010.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Agrawal A. Engaging the inventor: Exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge. Strategic Management Journal 2006, 27(1):63-79.
2. AUTM The unsung hero in job creation: New survey reveals universities' impact on the U.S. economy 2008, Association of University Technology Managers, Deerfield, IL.
3. Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 1991, 17(1):99-120.
4. Barringer B., Ireland D. Entrepreneurship: Successfully launching new ventures 2006, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
5. Benneworth P. Long-term academic relationships and high-technology small firms. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies 2001, 2(2):1-13.
6. Bercovitz J., Feldman M. Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science 2008, 19(1):69-89.
7. Carlsson B., Fridh A. Technology transfer in United States universities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2002, 12(2):199-233.
8. Chrisman J., Hynes T., Fraser S. Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: The case of the University of Calgary. Journal of Business Venturing 1995, 10(4):267-281.
9. Colyvas C., Crow M., Gelijns A., Mazzoleni R., Nelson R., Rosenberg N., et al. How do university inventions get into practice?. Management Science 2002, 48(1):61-72.
10. DiGregorio D., Shane S. Why do some universities generate more startups than others?. Research Policy 2003, 32(2):209-227.
11. Etzkowitz H. The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkage. Research Policy 1998, 27(8):823-833.
12. Feldman M., Feller I., Bercovitz J. Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities. Management Science 2002, 48(1):105-121.
13. Florida R., Kenney M. Venture capital, high technology, and regional development. Regional Studies 1988, 22(1):33-48.
14. Franklin S., Wright M., Lockett A. Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. Journal of Technology Transfer 2001, 26(1):127-141.
15. Friedman J., Silberman J. University technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter?. Journal of Technology Transfer 2003, 28(1):17-30.
16. George G., Zahra S., Wood D. The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing 2002, 17(6):577-609.
17. Ireland D., Webb J. Crossing the great divide of entrepreneurship: Transitioning between exploration and exploitation. Business Horizons 2009, 52(5):469-479.
18. Jensen R., Thursby M. The disclosure and licensing of university inventions: The best we can do with the st we get to work with. International Journal of Industrial Economics 2003, 21(9):1271-1300.
19. Kim Y. An analysis of the incentives to licensing in U.S. information technology. Journal of American Academy of Business 2004, 5(1-2):31-36.
20. Kim Y., Vonortas N. Determinants of technology licensing: The case of licensors. Managerial and Decision Economics 2006, 27(4):235-249.
21. Lahti R., Beyerlein M. Knowledge transfer and management consulting: A look at 'The Firm'. Business Horizons 2002, 43(1):65-75.
22. Laukkanen M. Exploring academic entrepreneurship: Drivers and tensions of university-based business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 2003, 10(4):372-382.
23. Link, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, M. (2006). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer (Working Paper in Economics, No. 0610). Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
24. Markman G., Phan P., Balkin D., Gianiodis P. Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing 2005, 20(2):241-263.
25. McEvily S., Chakravarthy B. The persistence of knowledge based advantage: An empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal 2002, 23(4):285-385.
26. Nekar, A., & Shane, S. (2003). When do start-ups that exploit patented academic knowledge survive? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1391-1410.
27. Nicolaou N., Birley S. Academic networks in a trichotomous categorisation of university spinouts. Journal of Business Venturing 2003, 18(3):333-359.
28. O'Shea R., Allen T., O'Gorman C., Roche F. Universities and technology transfer: A review of academic entrepreneurship literature. Irish Journal of Management 2004, 25(2):11-29.
29. Owen-Smith J., Powell W. To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer 2001, 16(1-2):99-114.
30. Penrose E. The theory of the growth of the firm 1959, Wiley, London.
31. Santoro M., Bierly P. Facilitators of knowledge transfer in university-industry collaborations: A knowledge based perspective. Transactions of Engineering Management 2006, 53(4):495-507.
32. Saxenian A. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 1994, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
33. Schramm, C. (2006). Five universities you can do business with. Inc. Magazine. Retrieved June 12, 2010, from http://www.inc.com/magazine/20060201/views-opinion.html.
34. Shane S. Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation 2004, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
35. Shane S., Stuart T. Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science 2002, 48(1):154-171.
36. Smilor R., Gibson D., Dietrich G. University spin-out companies: Technology start-ups from UT-Austin. Journal of Business Venturing 1991, 5(1):63-77.
37. Sprinkle, T. (2006). Come together. Entrepreneur Magazine. Retrieved May 27, 2010, from http://www.entrepreneur.com/startingabusiness/%C2%ADstartupbasics/findin ghelp/article160014.html.
38. Teece D. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy 1986, 15(6):285-306.
39. Thursby J., Thursby M. Are faculty critical? Their role in university-industry licensing. Contemporary Economic Policy 2004, 22(2):162-178.
40. Thursby J., Thursby M. University licensing. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2007, 23(4):620-639.
41. Wood M. Does one size fit all? The multiple organizational forms leading to successful academic entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2009, 33(4):929-947.
42. Wood M., McKinley W. The production of entrepreneurial opportunity: A constructivist perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 2010, 4(1):66-84.
43. Yusof M., Jain K. Categories of university-level entrepreneurship: A literature survey. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal 2010, 6(1):81-96.
44. Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science 1995, 6(1):76-92.
45. Zhao F. Academic entrepreneurship: Case study of Australian universities. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 2004, 5(2):91-97.