Locomotor activity in a novel environment predicts both responding for a visual stimulus and self-administration of a low dose of methamphetamine in rats

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 295-304

  Gancarz, Amy M ^a,b   George, Michele A San ^a   Ashrafioun, Lisham ^a,b   Richards, Jerry B ^a,b  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE ON ADDICTIONS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Individual differences; Operant conditioning; Rats; Self administration; Sensory reinforcement; Visual stimuli

Indexed keywords

METHAMPHETAMINE;

DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; DRUG; LOCOMOTION; MOVEMENT; RODENT; SENSORY SYSTEM; VISUAL CUE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; SENSATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ANIMALS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; ENVIRONMENT; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; INDIVIDUALITY; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MALE; METHAMPHETAMINE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SELF ADMINISTRATION;

RATTUS;

EID: 79551685256     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ambrosio E., Goldberg S.R., Elmer G.I. Behavior genetic investigation of the relationship between spontaneous locomotor activity and the acquisition of morphine self-administration behavior. Behav. Pharmacol. 1995, 6:229-237.
2. Ashrafioun L., Gancarz A.M., San George M., Richards J.B. Effects of methamphetamine on the reinforcing value of novel and familiar visual stimuli. Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting 2008.
3. Bardo M.T., Donohew R.L., Harrington N.G. Psychobiology of novelty seeking and drug seeking behavior. Behav. Brain Res. 1996, 77:23-43.
4. Bardo M.T., Klebaur J.E., Valone J.M., Deaton C. Environmental enrichment decreases intravenous self-administration of amphetamine in female and male rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2001, 155:278-284.
5. Berlyne D.E. The reward-value of indifferent stimulation. Reinforcement and Behavior 1969, Academic Press, New York. J.T. Tapp (Ed.).
6. Blanchard M.M., Mendelsohn D., Stamp J.A. The HR/LR model: further evidence as an animal model of sensation seeking. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2009, 33:1145-1154.
7. Bowling S.L., Rowlett J.K., Bardo M.T. The effect of environmental enrichment on amphetamine-stimulated locomotor activity, dopamine synthesis and dopamine release. Neuropharmacology 1993, 32:885-893.
8. Caggiula A.R., Donny E.C., Chaudhri N., Perkins K.A., Evans-Martin F.F., Sved A.F. Importance of nonpharmacological factors in nicotine self-administration. Physiol. Behav. 2002, 77:683-687.
9. Caggiula A.R., Donny E.C., Palmatier M.I., Liu X., Chaudhri N., Sved A.F. The role of nicotine in smoking: a dual-reinforcement model. Nebr. Symp. Motiv. 2009, 55:91-109.
10. Caggiula A.R., Donny E.C., White A.R., Chaudhri N., Booth S., Gharib M.A., Hoffman A., Perkins K.A., Sved A.F. Cue dependency of nicotine self-administration and smoking. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2001, 70:515-530.
11. Caggiula A.R., Donny E.C., White A.R., Chaudhri N., Booth S., Gharib M.A., Hoffman A., Perkins K.A., Sved A.F. Environmental stimuli promote the acquisition of nicotine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2002, 163:230-237.
12. Cain M.E., Dotson W.F., Bardo M.T. Individual differences in the effect of novel environmental stimuli prior to amphetamine self-administration in rats (Rattus norvegicus). Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2006, 14:389-401.
13. Cain M.E., Green T.A., Bardo M.T. Environmental enrichment decreases responding for visual novelty. Behav. Processes 2006, 73:360-366.
14. Carroll M.E., Boe I.N. Increased intravenous drug self-administration during deprivation of other reinforcers. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1982, 17:563-567.
15. Carroll M.E., France C.P., Meisch R.A. Food deprivation increases oral and intravenous drug intake in rats. Science 1979, 205:319-321.
16. Chaudhri N., Caggiula A.R., Donny E.C., Booth S., Gharib M., Craven L., Palmatier M.I., Liu X., Sved A.F. Self-administered and noncontingent nicotine enhance reinforced operant responding in rats: impact of nicotine dose and reinforcement schedule. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2007, 190:353-362.
17. Chaudhri N., Caggiula A.R., Donny E.C., Palmatier M.I., Liu X., Sved A.F. Complex interactions between nicotine and nonpharmacological stimuli reveal multiple roles for nicotine in reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2006, 184:353-366.
18. Chaudhri N., Caggiula A.R., Donny E.C., Booth S., Gharib M.A., Clements L.A., Allen S.S., Sved A.F. Enhancement of reinforced operant responding by nicotine and cocaine in rats; analysis of dose and drug-contingency. Society for Neuroscience 2003.
19. Davis B.A., Clinton S.M., Akil H., Becker J.B. The effects of novelty-seeking phenotypes and sex differences on acquisition of cocaine self-administration in selectively bred high-responder and low-responder rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2008, 90:331-338.
20. Davis J.D. The reinforcing effect of weak-light onset as a function of amount of food deprivation. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1958, 51:496-498.
21. Dellu F., Piazza P.V., Mayo W., Le Moal M., Simon H. Novelty-seeking in rats-biobehavioral characteristics and possible relationship with the sensation-seeking trait in man. Neuropsychobiology 1996, 34:136-145.
22. Deroche-Gamonet V., Piat F., Le Moal M., Piazza P.V. Influence of cue-conditioning on acquisition, maintenance and relapse of cocaine intravenous self-administration. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2002, 15:1363-1370.
23. Donny E.C., Caggiula A.R., Mielke M.M., Jacobs K.S., Rose C., Sved A.F. Acquisition of nicotine self-administration in rats: the effects of dose, feeding schedule, and drug contingency. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 1998, 136:83-90.
24. Donny E.C., Chaudhri N., Caggiula A.R., Evans-Martin F.F., Booth S., Gharib M.A., Clements L.A., Sved A.F. Operant responding for a visual reinforcer in rats is enhanced by noncontingent nicotine: implications for nicotine self-administration and reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2003, 169:68-76.
25. Eisenberger R. Explanation of rewards that do not reduce tissue needs. Psychol. Bull. 1972, 77:319-339.
26. Fehrer E. The effects of hunger and familiarity of locale on exploration. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1956, 49:549-552.
27. Feigley D.A., Hamilton L.W. Response to novel environment following septal lesions or cholinergic blockade in rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1971, 76:496-504.
28. Fleshler M., Hoffman H.S. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1962, 5:529-530.
29. Fuller J.L. Experiential deprivation and later behavior. Science 1967, 158:1645-1652.
30. Glow P.H., Russell A. Drug enhanced sensory contingent bar pressing: comparing the effect of contingent and noncontingent sensory change. Psychopharmacologia 1973, 32(3):285-292.
31. Glow P.H., Russell A. Effects of dexamphetamine, amylobarbitone sodium and their mixture on sensory contingent bar pressing behaviour in the rat. Psychopharmacologia 1973, 31(3):239-251.
32. Glow P.H., Russell A. Sensory-contingent barpressing for familiar and novel change under a dexamphetamine-amylobarbitone mixture. Anim. Learn.Behav. 1974, 2(February (1)):27-30.
33. Gomer F.E., Jakubczak L.F. Dose-dependent selective facilitation of response-contingent light-onset behavior by d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacologia 1974, 34(3):199-208.
34. Green T.A., Cain M.E., Thompson M., Bardo M.T. Environmental enrichment decreases nicotine-induced hyperactivity in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2003, 170:235-241.
35. Green T.A., Gehrke B.J., Bardo M.T. Environmental enrichment decreases intravenous amphetamine self-administration in rats: dose-response functions for fixed- and progressive-ratio schedules. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2002, 162:373-378.
36. Keiflin R., Vouillac C., Cador M. Level of operant training rather than cocaine intake predicts level of reinstatement. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2008, 197:247-261.
37. Kish G.B. Studies of sensory reinforcement. Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application 1966, Appletone-Century-Crofts, New York. W. Honig (Ed.).
38. Marinelli M., White F.J. Enhanced vulnerability to cocaine self-administration is associated with elevated impulse activity of midbrain dopamine neurons. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20:8876-8885.
39. Miller A.A., Sethna D.M., Young P.A. Initial suppression of the locomotor stimulant response to dexamphetamine in rats exposed to a novel environment. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1970, 39:230P-232P.
40. Nadal R., Armario A., Janak P.H. Positive relationship between activity in a novel environment and operant ethanol self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2002, 162:333-338.
41. Oei T.P. Effects of body weight reduction and food deprivation on cocaine self-administration. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1983, 19:453-455.
42. Palmatier M.I., Evans-Martin F.F., Hoffman A., Caggiula A.R., Chaudhri N., Donny E.C., Liu X., Booth S., Gharib M., Craven L., Sved A.F. Dissociating the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine using a rat self-administration paradigm with concurrently available drug and environmental reinforcers. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2006, 184:391-400.
43. Palmatier M.I., Matteson G.L., Black J.J., Liu X., Caggiula A.R., Craven L., Donny E.C., Sved A.F. The reinforcement enhancing effects of nicotine depend on the incentive value of non-drug reinforcers and increase with repeated drug injections. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007, 89:52-59.
44. Piazza P.V., Deminiere J.M., Le Moal M., Simon H. Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 1989, 245:1511-1513.
45. Piazza P.V., Deminiere J.M., Maccari S., Mormede P., Le Moal M., Simon H. Individual reactivity to novelty predicts probability of amphetamine self-administration. Behav. Pharmacol. 1990, 1:339-345.
46. Piazza P.V., Deroche-Gamonent V., Rouge-Pont F., Le Moal M. Vertical shifts in self-administration dose-response functions predict a drug-vulnerable phenotype predisposed to addiction. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20:4226-4232.
47. Pierre P.J., Vezina P. Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 1997, 129:277-284.
48. Quick S.L., Shahan T.A. Behavioral momentum of cocaine self-administration: effects of frequency of reinforcement on resistance to extinction. Behav. Pharmacol. 2009, 20:337-345.
49. Raiff B.R., Dallery J. Responding maintained by primary reinforcing visual stimuli is increased by nicotine administration in rats. Behav. Processes 2009, 82:95-99.
50. Richards J.B., Mitchell S.H., de Wit H., Seiden L.S. Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1997, 67:353-366.
51. Richards W.J., Leslie G.R. Food and water deprivation as influences on exploration. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1962, 55:834-837.
52. Sizemore G.M., Gaspard T.M., Kim S.A., Walker L.E., Vrana S.L., Dworkin S.I. Dose-effect functions for cocaine self-administration: effects of schedule and dosing procedure. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1997, 57:523-531.
53. Smith R.C., Donahoe J.W. The effects of food deprivation on unreinforced and light-reinforced bar pressing. J. Genet. Psychol. 1966, 108:213-219.
54. Suto N., Austin J.D., Vezina P. Locomotor response to novelty predicts a rat's propensity to self-administer nicotine. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2001, 158:175-180.
55. Tapp J.T. Activity, reactivity, and the behavior-directing properties of stimuli. Reinforcement and Behavior 1969, Academic Press, New York. J.T. Tapp (Ed.).
56. Winterbauer N.E., Balleine B.W. The influence of amphetamine on sensory and conditioned reinforcement: evidence for the re-selection hypothesis of dopamine function. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2007, 1:9.
57. Zuckerman M. Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking 1994, Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.