The battle for world wide web dominance: In search of network externalities

International Business Management

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 66-75

  Bhatiasevi, Veera ^a   Chiaravutthi, Yingyot ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Email; Market lader; Network externalities; Search engine; Thailand; World wide web

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551646278     PISSN: 19935250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/ibm.2011.66.75     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Battelle, J., 2005. The Search: How Google and its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture. Penguin Group Inc., New York.
2. Berndt, E.R., R.S. Pindyck and P. Azoulay, 1999. Network Effects and Diffusion in Pharmaceutical Markets: Antiulcer Drugs. Vol. 7024, National Bureau of Economic Research, America.
3. Brynjolfsson, E. and C.F. Kemerer, 1996. Network externalities in microcomputer software: An econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market. Manage. Sci., 42: 1627-1647.
4. Capello, R., 1994. Spatial Economic Analysis of Telecommunications Network Externalities. Ashgate Publishing, Brookfield.
5. Chiaravutthi, Y., 2006. Firms strategies and network externalities: Empirical evidence from the browser war. J. HighTechnol. Manage. Res., 17: 27-42.
6. Coffman, K.G. and A.M. Odlyzko, 1998. The size and growth rate of the internet. AT and T Labs, http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/internet.size.pdf.
7. Computer Hope, 2009. Microsoft. http://www.computerhope.com/comp/msoft.htm.
8. Cusumano, M.A. and D.B. Yoffie, 1998. Competing on Internet Time: Lessons from Netscape and its Battle with Microsoft. Simon and Schuster Inc., New York.
9. Dube, J.P., G.J. HitschandP.E. Rossi, 2009. Do switching costs make markets less competitive?. J. Marketing Res., 46: 435-445.
10. Ermecke, R., P. Mayrhofer and S. Wagner, 2009. Agents of diffusion-Insights from a survey of facebook users. Proceedings of 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Jan. 5-8, Big Island, HI.,pp: 1-10.
11. Gandal, N, 1994. Hedonic price indexes for spreadsheets and an empirical-test for network externalities. Rand J. Econ, 25: 160-170.
12. Gandal, N, 1995. Competing compatibility standard and network externalities in the PC software market. Rev. Econ. Statistics, 77: 599-608.
13. Gandal, N, 2001. The dynamics of competition in the internet search engine market. Int. J. Ind. Org., 19: 1103-1117.
14. Goldman, D., 2009. Microsoft and yahoo: Search partners. http://money.cnn.com/2009/07/29/technology/microsoft_yahoo/?postversion=2009072908.
15. Google, 2009. Technology overview. http://www.google.com/corporate/tech.htm1.
16. Goolsbee, A. and P.J. Klenow, 1999. Evidence on learning and network externalities in the diffusion of home computers. Working Paper vol. 7329, National Bureau of Economic Research.
17. Gowrisankaran, G. and J. Stavins, 1999. Network externalities and technology adoption: Lessons from electronic payments. Working Paper vol. 99-5. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, http://ideas.repec.Org/p/fip/fedfap/2002-16.html.
18. Graham, J., 2008. E-mail carriers deliver gifts of nifty features to lure, keep users. http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/2008-04-15-google-gmail-webmail_N.htm.
19. Greenstein, S.M., 1993. Did installed base give an incumbent any (measurable) advantages in federal computer procurement?. Rand J. Econ, 24: 19-39.
20. Hanison-Walker, L. J., 2001. The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents. J. Service Res., 4: 60-75.
21. Iimi, A., 2005. Estimated demand for cellular phone services in Japan. Telecommunications Policy, 29: 3-23.
22. International Data Corporation, 2008. IDC finds more of the world's population connecting to the internet in new ways and embracing web 2.0 activities. http://findarticles.eom/p/articles/mi_mOEIN/is_2008_June_25/ai_n27507869/.
23. Katz, M.L. and C. Shapiro, 1985. Network externalities, competition and compatibility. Am. Econ. Rev., 75: 424-440.
24. Kincaid, J., 2008. Search challenges email as most popular daily online activity, http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/06/search-challenges-email-as-most-popular-daily-online-activity.
25. Mahler, A. and E.M. Rogers, 1999. The diffusion of interactive communication innovations and the critical mass: The adoption of telecommunications services by German banks. Telecommunications Policy, 23: 719-740.
26. McAndrews, J.J. and R.J. Kauffman, 1993. Network externalities and shared electronic banking network adoption. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, http://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedpwp/93-18.html.
27. NECTEC, 2008. Internet user profile of Thailand 2008. http://pld.nectec.or.th/websrii/images/stories/documents/books/internetuser_2008.pdf.
28. Netmarketshare, 2009. Browser market share. http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=0.
29. Peter, I., 2004. The history of email. http://www.nethistory.info/History%20of%20the%20Internet/email.html.
30. Reuters, 2008. Timeline: Microsoft attempt to buy yahoo.http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSGOR47298420080505.
31. Saloner, G. and A. Shepard, 1995. Adoption of technologies with network externalities: An empirical examination of the adoption of automatic teller machines. Rand J. Econ, 26: 479-501.
32. TrueHits, 2009. Truehits statistics, http://truehits.net/graph/graph_stat.php#SEARCH.
33. Wall, A., 2007. History of search engines: From 1945 to Google today. http://www.searchenginehistory.com/#yahoo.
34. Weber, B. W., 2006. Adoption of electronic trading at the International Securities Exchange. Decision Support Syst.,41: 728-746.
35. Yahoo, 1997. Yahoo! expands community services with free e-mail, http://docs.yahoo.com/docs/pr/release124.html.
36. eMarket Services, 2009. World e-commerce to double by 2012. http://www.emarketservices.com/start/index.html?cl=ems&mi=6&mi2=l&mi3=l&so=l&ca=new&ni=l&ci=2302.