Facework and im/politeness across legal contexts: An introduction

Journal of Politeness Research

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-19

  Archer, Dawn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

co construction; facework; function; im politeness; intention; interpretation; multiple goals; power

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551611847     PISSN: 16125681     EISSN: 16134877     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/JPLR.2011.001     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Archer, Dawn. 2002. "Can innocent people be guilty?". A sociopragmatic analysis of examination transcripts from the Salem witchcraft trials. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 3 (1). 1-30.
2. Archer, Dawn. 2005. Historical sociopragmatics: Questions and answers in the English courtroom (1640-1760) (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
3. Archer, Dawn. 2006. (Re)initiating strategies. Judges and defendants in Early Modern English courtrooms. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 7 (2). 181-211.
4. Archer, Dawn. 2008. Verbal aggression and impoliteness: Related or synonymous. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (Language, Power and Social Process 21), 181-207. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
5. Archer, Dawn. Under review. Lawyers, facework and the adversarial courtroom. Submitted to the Journal of Pragmatics (March 2010).
6. Arundale, Robert B. 2006. Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 2 (2). 193-217.
7. Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca & Sandra Harris. 2006. Politeness at work: Issues and challenges. Journal of Politeness Research 2 (1). 7-34.
8. Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1987 [1978]. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in interaction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
10. Bousfield, Derek & Miriam Locher (eds.). 2008. Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (Language, Power and Social Process 21), Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
11. Christie, Christine. 2007. Relevance theory and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 3 (2). 269-294.
12. nd edn. Chicago and London: University of Chicago.
13. Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25. 349-367.
14. Culpeper, Jonathan. 1998. (Im)politeness in dramatic dialogue. In Jonathan Culpeper, Mick Short & Peter Verdonk (eds.), Exploring the language of drama: From text to context, 83-95. London: Routledge.
15. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1). 35-72.
16. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2008. Reflections on impoliteness, relational work and power. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (Language, Power and Social Process 21), 17-44. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
17. Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield & Anne Wichmann. 2003. Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35. 1545-79.
18. Eelen, Gino. 1999. Politeness and ideology: A critical review. Pragmatics 9 (1). 163-173.
19. Fowler, Roger. 1986. Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Fraser, Bruce. 2005. Whither politeness. In Robin T. Lakoff & Sachiko Ide (eds.), Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness, 65-83. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
21. Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour. New York: Pantheon Books.
22. Harré, Rom. 1979. Social being. Oxford: Blackwell.
23. Harris, Sandra. 1984. Questions as a mode of control in magistrates' courts. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 49. 5-27.
24. Harris, Sandra. 2001. Being politically impolite: Extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse. Discourse and Society 12. 451-72.
25. Harris, Sandra. 2003. Politeness and power: Making and responding to "requests" in institutional settings. Text 23. 27-52.
26. Harris, Sandra. 2010. Politeness. In Louise Cummings (ed.), Pragmatics encyclopedia, 327-330. London and New York: Routledge.
27. Harris, Sandra. Forthcoming 2011. The limits of politeness re-visited: Courtroom discourse as a case in point. In Linguistic Politeness Research Group, Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
28. Haugh, Michael & Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini. 2010. Face in interaction (special edition). Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8). 2073-2077.
29. Holmes, Janet & Maria Stubbe. 2003. Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. London: Longman.
30. Kasper, Gabriele. 1990. Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2). 193-218.
31. Kienpointner, Manfred. 1997. Varieties of rudeness: Types and functions of impolite utterances. Functions of Language 4 (2). 251-287.
32. Kopytko, Rudanko. 1995. Linguistic politeness strategies in Shakespeare's plays. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics, 515-540. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
33. Kurzon, Dennis. 2001. The politeness of judges: American and English judicial behaviour. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (1). 61-85.
34. Lakoff, Robin T. 1989. The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua 8 (2/3). 101-29.
35. Lakoff, Robin T. 1990. Talking power: The politics of language. New York: Basic Books.
36. Limberg, Holger. 2008. Threats in conflict talk: Impoliteness and manipulation. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (Language, Power and Social Process 21), 155-180. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
37. Locher, Miriam A. & Richard J. Watts. 2008. Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (Language, Power and Social Process 21), 77-100. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
38. Matoesian, Gregory M. 1993. Reproducing rape. Domination through talk in the courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Mills, Sara. 2005. Gender and impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (2). 263-280.
41. Penman, Robyn. 1990. Facework and politeness: Multiple goals in courtroom discourse. In Karen Tracy & Nikolas Coupland (eds.), Multiple goals in discourse, 15-37. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
42. Tracy, Karen. 2008. "Reasonable hostility": Situation-appropriate face-attack. Journal of Politeness Research 4 (2). 169-192.
43. Wartenberg, Thomas E. 1990. The Forms of power. From domination to transformation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
44. Watts, Richard J. 1992. Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice, 43-69. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
45. Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.