Comparison of MATSim and EMME/2 on greater toronto and hamilton area network, Canada

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2197, 2010, Pages 118-128

  Gao, Wenli ^a   Balmer, Michael ^b   Miller, Eric J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLOW PATTERNS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

AGENT BASED; HAMILTONS; MICROSIMULATION MODELING; MODELLING TECHNIQUES; STATIONARY STATE; STEP MODELS; STOCHASTICS; TORONTO; TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

TRAVEL TIME;

EID: 79551590699     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2197-14     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. EMME Users' Guide, Reference Manual, Prompt Manual v3.0. INRO, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2008.
2. Balmer, M. Travel Demand Modeling for Multi-Agent Transport Simulations: Algorithms and Systems. PhD dissertation. ETH Zurich, Switzerland, 2007.
3. MATSim. http://www.matsim.org. Accessed May 2009.
4. Papageorgiou, M. (ed.). Concise Encyclopedia of Traffic and Transportation Systems. Pergamon Press, New York, 1991.
5. Shao, C. F. (ed.). Traffic Planning. China Railway Publishing House, Beijing, 2007.
6. Sheffi, Y. Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1985.
7. Daganzo, C. F., and Y. Sheffi. On Stochastic Models of Traffic Assignment. Transportation Science, Vol. 11, 1977, pp. 253-274.
8. Cascetta, E. A Stochastic Process Approach to the Analysis of Temporal Dynamics in Transportation Networks. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 23, 1989, pp. 1-17.
9. Wardrop, J. G. Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, Vol. 1, 1952.
10. Rieser, M., K. Nagel, U. Beuck, M. Balmer, and J. Rümenapp. Agent-Oriented Coupling of Activity-Based Demand Generation with Multiagent Traffic Simulation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2021, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 10-17.
11. Law, A. M., and D. W. Kelton. Simulation Modelling and Analysis, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000.
12. Chung, C. A. Simulation Modelling Handbook: A Practical Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 2004.
13. Raney, B., and K. Nagel. Iterative Route Planning for Large-Scale Modular Transportation Simulations. Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 20, No. 7, 2004, pp. 1101-1118.
14. Miller, E. J., and M. J. Roorda. Prototype Model of Household Activity-Travel Scheduling. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 114-121.
15. Roorda, M. J., E. J. Miller, and N. Kruchten. Incorporating Within-Household Interactions into Mode Choice Model with Genetic Algorithm for Parameter Estimation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1985, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 171-179.
16. Rieser, M., D. Grether, and K. Nagel. Adding Mode Choice to Multiagent Transport Simulation. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 171-179.
17. Griesenbeck, B., and G. Garry. Comparison of Activity-Based Tour Model to Four-Step Model as a Tool for Metropolitan Transportation Planning. Proc., National Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Daytona Beach, Fla., 2007.
18. Raney, B. K., and K. Nagel. Truly Agent-Based Strategy Selection for Transportation Simulations. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
19. Charypar, D., and K. Nagel. Generating Complete All-Day Activity Plans with Genetic Algorithms. Transportation, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2005, pp. 369-397.
20. Rieser, M., U. Beuck, M. Balmer, and K. Nagel. Modeling and Simulation of a Morning Reaction to an Evening Toll. 2008. https://svn.vsp.tu-berlin.de. Accessed March 2009.
21. Cetin, N., A. Burri and K. Nagel. Parallel Queue Model Approach to Traffic Microsimulations. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
22. Lefebvre, N., and M. Balmer. Fast Shortest Path Computation in Time-Dependent Traffic Networks. 2007. http://www.ivt.ethz.ch. Accessed March 2009.
23. Charypar, D., K. W. Axhausen, and K. Nagel. Event-Driven Queue-Based Traffic Flow Microsimulation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2003, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 35-40.
24. 2001 Canadian Census. Statistics Canada. http://www12.statcan.ca. Accessed March 2009.
25. Data Management Group. University of Toronto. http://www.dmg.utoronto.ca. Accessed March 2009.
26. 2001 Transportation Tomorrow Survey: Design and Conduct of the Survey, Data Management Group, 2003.
27. 2001 Transportation Tomorrow Survey: Data Guide. Data Management Group, 2003.
28. 2001 GTA Cordon Count: Transportation Trends (1991-2001). Data Management Group, 2003.
29. Charypar, D. Efficient Algorithms for the Microsimulation of Travel Behavior in Very Large Scenarios. PhD dissertation. ETH Zurich, Switzerland, 2008.
30. Ontario Highway 401. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highway-401-(Ontario). Accessed March 2009.