Agent-oriented coupling of activity-based demand generation with multiagent traffic simulation

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2021, 2007, Pages 10-17

  Rieser, Marcel ^a   Nagel, Kai ^a   Beuck, Ulrike ^a   Balmer, Michael ^b   Rümenapp, Jens ^c  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c Gertz Gutsche Rümenapp Stadtentwicklung und Mobilität   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT (DTA); MULTIAGENT TRAFFIC SIMULATION;

TRAFFIC CONGESTION;

EID: 40049090947     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2021-02     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Beckman, R. J., K. A. Baggerly, and M. D. McKay. Creating Synthetic Base-Line Populations. Transportation Research A, Vol. 30, No. 6, 1996, pp. 415-429.
2. Jonnalagadda, N., J. Freedman, W. A. Davidson, and J. D. Hunt. Development of Microsimulation Activity-Based Model for San Francisco: Destination and Mode Choice Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1777, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 25-35.
3. Bowman, J. L., M. Bradley, Y. Shiftan, T. K. Lawton, and M. Ben-Akiva. Demonstration of an Activity-Based Model for Portland. In World Transport Research: Selected Proc., 8th World Conference on Transport Research 1998, Vol. 3, Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1999, pp. 171-184.
4. Pendyala, R. M., R. Kitamura, A. Kikuchi, T. Yamamoto, and S. Fujii. Florida Activity Mobility Simulator. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1921, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 123-130.
5. Miller, E. J., and M. J. Roorda. Prototype Model of Household ActivityTravel Scheduling. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 114-121.
6. Arentze, T. A., and H. J. P. Timmermans. Albatross: A Learning-Based Transportation Oriented Simulation System. European Institute of Retailing and Services Studies, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2000.
7. Arentze, T. A., and H. J. P. Timmermans. ALBATROSS, Version 2.0. A Learning Based Transportation Oriented Simulation System. European Institute of Retailing and Services Studies, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2005.
8. Watling, D. Asymmetric Problems and Stochastic Process Models of Traffic Assignment. Transportation Research B, Vol. 30, No. 5, 1996, pp. 339-357.
9. Dynasmart home page, www.dynasmart.com. Accessed July 2006.
10. DynaMIT home page, mit.edu/its. Accessed July 2006.
11. Friedrich, M., I. Hofsäß, K. Nökel, and P. Vortisch. A Dynamic Traffic Assignment Method for Planning and Telematic Applications. In Proc., Seminar K, Vol. P445 of European Transport Conference, PTRC, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2000, pp. 29-40.
12. Loudon, W. R., J. Parameswaran, and B. Gardner. Incorporating Feedback in Travel Forecasting. In Transportation Research Record 1607, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 185-195.
13. Raney, B., and K. Nagel. Iterative Route Planning for Large-Scale Modular Transportation Simulations. Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 20, No. 7, 2004, pp. 1101-1118.
14. Ferber, J. Multi-agent Systems. An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley, Boston, Mass., 1999.
15. Jara-Diaz, S. R., and R. Guerra. Modelling Activity Duration and Travel Choice from a Common Microeconomic Framework. Proc., Meeting of the International Association for Travel Behavior Research, Lucerne, Switzerland, 2003. www.ivt.baum.ethz.ch.
16. Avineri, E., and J. N. Prashker. Sensitivity to Uncertainty: Need for Paradigm Shift. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1854, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 90-98.
17. TRANSIMS home page, www.transims.net. Accessed July 2006.
18. de Palma, A., and F. Marchal. Real Case Applications of the Fully Dynamic Metropolis Tool-Box: An Advocacy for Large-Scale Mesoscopic Transportation Systems. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2002, pp. 347-369.
19. MATSim home page, www.matsim.org. Accessed July 2006.
20. Cetin, N., A. Burri, and K. Nagel. A Large-Scale Agent-Based Traffic Microsimulation Based on Queue Model. Proc., Swiss Transport Research Conference, Monte Verita, Switzerland, 2003. www.strc.ch.
21. Balmer, M., M. Rieser, A. Vogel, K. W. Axhausen, and K. Nagel. Generating Day Plans Using Hourly Origin-Destination Matrices. In Jahrbuch 2004/05 Schweizerische Verkehrswirtschaft (T. Bieger, C. Laesser, and R. Maggi, eds.), St. Gallen, Switzerland, 2005, pp. 5-36.
22. Bhat, C. R., J. Y. Guo, S. Srinivasan, and A. Sivakumar. Comprehensive Econometric Microsimulator for Daily Activity-Travel Patterns. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 57-66.
23. Kutter, E. Integrierte Berechnung städtischen Personenverkehrs Dokumentation der Entwicklung eines Verkehrsberechnungsmodells für die Verkehrsentwicklungsplanung Berlin (West). Berlin, 1984.
24. Kutter, E., H-J. Mikota, J. Rümenapp, and I. Steinmeyer. Untersuchung auf der Basis der Haushaltsbefragung 1998 (Berlin und Umland) zur Aktualisierung des Modells Pers Verk Berlin /RPlan, sowie speziell der Entwicklung der Verhaltensparameter '86-'98 im Westteil Berlins, der Validierung bisheriger Hypothesen zum Verhalten im Ostteil, der Bestimmung von Verhaltensparametern für das Umland. Entwurf des Schlussberichts im Auftrag der Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung Berlin. Berlin, 2002.
25. Raney, B., and K. Nagel. Improved Framework for Large-Scale Multiagent Simulations of Travel Behavior. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
26. Rümenapp, J., and I. Steinmeyer: Activity-Based Demand Generation: Anwendung des Berliner Personenverkehrsmodells zur Erzeugung von Aktivitätenketten als Input für Multi-Agenten-Simulationen. Arbeitsberichte Verkehrssystemplanung und Verkehrstelematik Nr. 06-09, Berlin, 2006.
27. Meister, K., M. Balmer, K. W. Axhausen, and K. Nagel. Planomat: A Comprehensive Scheduler for a Large-Scale Multi-agent Transportation Simulation. Proc., Swiss Transport Research Conference, Monte Verita, Switzerland, 2006. www.strc.ch.
28. Charypar, D., and K. Nagel. Generating Complete All-Day Activity Plans with Genetic Algorithms. Transportation, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2005, pp. 369-397.
29. Arnott, R., A. de Palma, and R. Lindsey. A Structural Model of PeakPeriod Congestion: A Traffic Bottleneck with Elastic Demand. American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 1, 1993, p. 161.
30. Balmer, M., B. Raney, and K. Nagel. Adjustment of Activity Timing and Duration in an Agent-Based Traffic Flow Simulation. In Progress in Activity-Based Analysis (H. J. P. Timmermans, ed.), Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2005, pp. 91-114.