Excited electron-bubble states in superfluid 4He: A time-dependent density functional approach

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 134, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Mateo, David ^a   Jin, Dafei ^b   Barranco, Manuel ^a   Pi, Mart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADIABATIC APPROXIMATIONS; ADIABATICITY; BREAK DOWN; EXCITED ELECTRONS; FUNCTIONALS; OPTIMAL METHODS; PHYSICAL REALIZATION; PICOSECONDS; QUANTITATIVE RESULT; SYSTEMATIC STUDY; TIME EVOLUTIONS; TIME-DEPENDENT DENSITY; TIME-RESOLVED ABSORPTION;

ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; ELECTRONS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

SUPERFLUID HELIUM;

EID: 79551583301     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3544216     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. J. Eloranta and V. A. Apkarian, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 10139 (2002). 10.1063/1.1520139
2. A. Ghosh and H. J. Maris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 265301 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.265301 (Pubitemid 43061559)
3. V. Grau, M. Barranco, R. Mayol, and M. Pi, Phys. Rev. B 73, 064502 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.064502 (Pubitemid 43270739)
4. M. Rosenblit and J. Jortner, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 194505 (2006); 10.1063/1.2192780 (Pubitemid 43782021)
5. M. Rosenblit and J. Jortner, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 194506 (2006). 10.1063/1.2192782 (Pubitemid 43782022)
6. M. Pi, R. Mayol, A. Hernando, M. Barranco, and F. Ancilotto, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 244502 (2007). 10.1063/1.2745297 (Pubitemid 47141424)
7. L. Lehtovaara and J. Eloranta, J. Low Temp. Phys. 148, 43 (2007). 10.1007/s10909-007-9348-3 (Pubitemid 46902036)
8. H. J. Maris, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 1 (2008). 10.1143/JPSJ.77.111008
9. W. Guo, D. Jin, G. M. Seidel, and H. J. Maris, Phys. Rev. B 79, 054515 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.054515
10. F. Ancilotto, M. Barranco, and M. Pi, Phys. Rev. B 80, 174504 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.174504
11. D. Mateo, A. Hernando, M. Barranco, and M. Pi, J. Low Temp. Phys. 158, 397 (2010). 10.1007/s10909-009-9923-x
12. D. Jin and H. J. Maris, J. Low Temp. Phys. 158, 317 (2010). 10.1007/s10909-009-9936-5
13. C. C. Grimes and G. Adams, Phys. Rev. B 41, 6366 (1990). 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.6366
14. C. C. Grimes and G. Adams, Phys. Rev. B 45, 2305 (1992). 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.2305
15. D. Jin, W. Guo, W. Wei, and H. J. Maris, J. Low Temp. Phys. 158, 307 (2010). 10.1007/s10909-009-9935-6
16. D. Mateo, M. Pi, and M. Barranco, Phys. Rev. B 81, 74510 (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.174510
17. H. J. Maris, A. Ghosh, D. Konstantinov, and M. Hirsch, J. Low Temp. Phys. 134, 227 (2004). 10.1023/B:JOLT.0000012560.74554.fb
18. F. Dalfovo, A. Lastri, L. Pricaupenko, S. Stringari, and J. Treiner, Phys. Rev. B 52, 1193 (1995). 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.1193
19. See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3544216 E-JCPSA6-134-025103 for movies of the dynamical evolution of electron bubbles.
20. E. Cheng, M.W. Cole, and M.H. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 50, 1136 (1994); 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1136
21. Erratum Phys. Rev. B 50, 16134 (1994). 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.16134
22. S. Stringari and J. Treiner, Phys. Rev. B 36, 16 (1987); 10.1103/PhysRevB.36.8369
23. J. Chem. Phys. 87, 5021 (1987). 10.1063/1.452818
24. D. Mateo, J. Navarro, and M. Barranco, Phys. Rev. B 82, 134529 (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.134529
25. R. J. Donnelly, J. A. Donnelly, and R. N. Hills, J. Low Temp. Phys. 44, 471 (1981). 10.1007/BF00117839
26. M. Frigo and S. G. Johnson, Proc. IEEE 93, 216 (2005). 10.1109/JPROC.2004.840301 (Pubitemid 40851223)
27. L. Giacomazzi, F. Toigo, and F. Ancilotto, Phys. Rev. B 67, 104501 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.104501
28. L. Lehtovaara, T. Kiljunen, and J. Eloranta, J. Comput. Phys. 194, 78 (2004). 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.08.020
29. A. Ralston and H. S. Wilf, Mathematical Methods for Digital Computers (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1960).
30. C. Cerjan, D. Kosloff, R. Kosloff, and M. Reshef, Geophysics 50, 705 (1985). 10.1190/1.1441945
31. D. Neuhauser and K. Lopata, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 134106 (2008). 10.1063/1.2985650
32. D. Jin and W. Guo, Phys. Rev. B 82, 094524 (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevB.82. 094524
33. J. Dupont-Roc, M. Himbert, N. Pavloff, and J. Treiner, J. Low Temp. Phys. 81, 31 (1990). 10.1007/BF00683150
34. J. Harms, J. P. Toennies, and F. Dalfovo, Phys. Rev. B 58, 3341 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.3341
35. K. Penanen, M. Fukuto, R. K. Heilmann, I. F. Silvera, and P. S. Pershan, Phys. Rev. B 62, 9621 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.9621 (Pubitemid 32336108)
36. L. Landau and E. Lifchitz, Mécanique des Fluides (ditions Mir, Moscow, 1971).
37. M. Weissbluth, Atoms and Molecules (Academic, New York, 1978).
38. Fig. displays the oscillator strength per energy level and not per state. states are twofold degenerate due to the two possible l values, l 1, while states are nondegenerate as l 0. For this reason, when these states become nearly degenerate in the split-bubble regime, one transition has f ∼ 0.32 and the other f ∼ 0.65, a factor of 2 larger.
39. E. Teller, J. Phys. Chem. 41, 1 (1937). 10.1021/j150379a010