Diffusion MRI predicts transrectal ultrasound biopsy results in prostate cancer detection

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 356-363

  Chen, Yu Jen ^a   Pu, Yeong Shiau ^b   Chueh, Shih Chieh ^b   Shun, Chia Tung ^b   Chu, Woei Chyn ^a   Tseng, Wen Yih Isaac ^b,c  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); diffusion tensor imaging (DTI); MRI; prostate cancer (PCA)

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; HUMAN; MALE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

AGED; BIOPSY; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 79551568089     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22421     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Catalona WJ, Richie JP, Ahmann FR, et al. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men. J Urol 1994; 151: 1283-1290.
2. Catalona WJ, Richie JP, deKernion JB, et al. Comparison of prostate specific antigen concentration versus prostate specific antigen density in the early detection of prostate cancer: receiver operating characteristic curves. J Urol 1994; 152 (Pt 1): 2031-2036.
3. Clark TW, Goldenberg L, Cooperberg PL, Wong AD, Singer J,. Stratification of prostate-specific antigen level and results of transrectal ultrasonography and digital rectal examination as predictors of positive prostate biopsy. Can Assoc Radiol J 1997; 48: 252-258.
4. Rietbergen JB, Kranse R, Hoedemaeker RF, et al. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen corrected for total prostate volume and transition zone volume in a population-based screening study. Urology 1998; 52: 237-246.
5. Sinha S, Sinha U,. In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of the human prostate. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 530-537.
6. Akin O, Hricak H,. Imaging of prostate cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 2007; 45: 207-222.
7. deSouza NM, Reinsberg SA, Scurr ED, Brewster JM, Payne GS,. Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: the value of apparent diffusion coefficients for identifying malignant nodules. Br J Radiol 2007; 80: 90-95.
8. Shi H, Ding HY,. Diffusion weighted imaging: its diagnostic and differential value for prostate cancer. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2007; 13: 605-609.
9. Issa B,. In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16: 196-200.
10. Hosseinzadeh K, Schwarz SD,. Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20: 654-661.
11. Manenti G, Carlani M, Mancino S, et al. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer. Invest Radiol 2007; 42: 412-419.
12. Miao H, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T,. Prostate cancer detection with 3-T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol 2007; 61: 297-302.
13. Chen M, Dang HD, Wang JY, et al. Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined. Acta Radiol 2008; 49: 602-610.
14. Kozlowski P, Chang SD, Meng R, et al. Combined prostate diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI at 3T-quantitative correlation with biopsy. Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 28: 621-628.
15. Yoshizako T, Wada A, Hayashi T, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer. Acta Radiol 2008; 49: 1207-1213.
16. Gurses B, Tasdelen N, Yencilek F, et al. Diagnostic utility of DTI in prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 2010 [Epub ahead of print].
17. Xu J, Humphrey PA, Kibel AS, et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion characteristics of histologically defined prostate cancer in humans. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 842-850.
18. Tamada T, Sone T, Jo Y, et al. Prostate cancer: relationships between postbiopsy hemorrhage and tumor detectability at MR diagnosis. Radiology 2008; 248: 531-539.
19. Kumar V, Jagannathan NR, Kumar R, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient of the prostate in men prior to biopsy: determination of a cut-off value to predict malignancy of the peripheral zone. NMR Biomed 2007; 20: 505-511.
20. Beyersdorff D, Taupitz M, Winkelmann B, et al. Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: value of MR imaging. Radiology 2002; 224: 701-706.
21. McNeal JE, Haillot O,. Patterns of spread of adenocarcinoma in the prostate as related to cancer volume. Prostate 2001; 49: 48-57.
22. Cruz M, Tsuda K, Narumi Y, et al. Characterization of low-intensity lesions in the peripheral zone of prostate on pre-biopsy endorectal coil MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 357-365.
23. Kumar V, Jagannathan NR, Kumar R, et al. Correlation between metabolite ratios and ADC values of prostate in men with increased PSA level. Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 541-548.
24. Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D,. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J 1994; 66: 259-267.
25. Mazaheri Y, Hricak H, Fine SW, et al. Prostate tumor volume measurement with combined T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted MR: Correlation with pathologic tumor volume. Radiology 2009; 252: 449-457.
26. Tamada T, Sone T, Toshimitsu S, et al. Age-related and zonal anatomical changes of apparent diffusion coefficient values in normal human prostatic tissues. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 552-556.
27. Cohen RJ, Shannon BA, Phillips M, Moorin RE, Wheeler TM, Garrett KL,. Central zone carcinoma of the prostate gland: a distinct tumor type with poor prognostic features. J Urol 2008; 179: 1762-1767; discussion 1767.