A goal-oriented requirements engineering method for business processes

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 72 LNBIP, Issue , 2011, Pages 29-43

  Decreus, Ken ^a   Poels, Geert ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Atlas Transformation Language; Business Process Modelling; Business Strategy Context Process; Goal Oriented Requirements Engineering

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROCESS DESIGN; SYSTEM THEORY;

ATLAS TRANSFORMATION LANGUAGES; BUSINESS ANALYSTS; BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS DESIGN; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELLING; BUSINESS-STRATEGY CONTEXT PROCESS; BUSINESS-USERS; COMMON LANGUAGES; ECLIPSE MODELLING FRAMEWORKS; GOAL-ORIENTED REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; META MODEL; MODEL TRANSFORMATION; MODELLING METHOD; OPERATIONAL TASKS; STRATEGIC REQUIREMENTS;

REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

EID: 79551553833     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17722-4_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Bleistein, S.J., Cox, K., Verner, J., Phalp, K.T.: B-SCP: A requirements analysis framework for validating strategic alignment of organizational IT based on strategy, context, and process. Information and Software Technology 48, 846-868 (2006)
2. Lapouchnian, A., Yu, Y., Mylopoulos, J.: Requirements-Driven Design and Configuration Management of Business Processes. Business Process Management, 246-261 (2007)
3. Harmon, P.: Business Process Change, Second Edition: A Guide for Business Managers and BPM and Six Sigma Professionals. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2007)
4. Smith, H., Fingar, P.: Business Process Management (BPM): The Third Wave (2004)
5. Woods, J., Genovese, Y.: Delivery of Commodity Business Applications in a BPMS Does Not Mean You Should Customize the Applications. Gartner Research G00139084 (2006)
6. OMG: BPMN 1.2 specification (2009), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/1.2/
7. Silver, B.: BPMN Method and Style. Cody-Cassidy Press (2009)
8. Havey, M.: Keeping BPM simple for business users: power users beware. BPTrends (January 2006)
9. Fernández, H.F., Palacios-González, E., García-Díaz, V., Pelayo G-Bustelo, B.C., Sanjuán Martínez, O., Cueva Lovelle, J.M.: SBPMN - An easier business process modeling notation for business users. Computer Standards & Interfaces 32, 18-28 (2010)
10. Recker, J.: Opportunities and constraints: the current struggle with BPMN. Business Process Management Journal 16, 181-201 (2010)
11. Muehlen, M., Recker, J.: How much language is enough? Theoretical and practical use of the business process modeling notation. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 465-479. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
12. Wieringa, R., Heerkens, J.: The methodological soundness of requirements engineering papers: a conceptual framework and two case studies. Requirements Engineering 11, 295-307 (2006)
13. * Goal Models into Business Process Models. In: 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, Atlanta (2009)
14. Jackson, M.: Problem Frames: Analysing and Structuring Software Development Problems. Addison-Wesley, New York (2000)
15. Sondhi, R.: Total Strategy. Airworthy Publications International Ltd. (1999)
16. Yu, E.: Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 226-235 (1997)
17. OMG: Business Motivation Model (2009), http://www.omg.org/spec/BMM/
18. Ould, M.A.: Business Processes: Modelling and Analysis for Reengineering and Improvement. Wiley, Chichester (1995)
19. Bleistein, S.J., Cox, K., Verner, J.: Validating strategic alignment of organizational IT requirements using goal modeling and problem diagrams. JSS 79, 362-378 (2006)
20. Eclipse: EMF - Eclipse Modelling Framework, http://www.eclipse.org/ modeling/emf/
21. OMG: Model Driven Architecture (2009), http://www.omg.org/mda/
22. Guizzardi, G.: On Ontology, ontologies, Conceptualizations, Modeling Languages, and (Meta) Models. In: Proceeding of the 2007 Conference on Databases and Information Systems IV: Selected Papers from the Seventh International Baltic Conference DB & IS 2006. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2007)
23. Eclipse: GMF - Graphical Modeling Framework, http://www.eclipse.org/ modeling/gmf/
24. Decreus, K.: Google Project Site (2010), http://code.google.com/p/ bscp2bpmn/
25. Eclipse: ATL - ATLAS Transformation Language, http://www.eclipse.org/m2m/ atl/
26. Cox, K., Bleistein, S.J., Reynolds, P., Thorogood, A.: A contingency view of organizational infrastructure requirements engineering. In: ACM SAC OE, France (2006)
27. Maiden, N.A.M., Jones, S.V., Manning, S., Greenwood, J., Renou, L.: Model-driven requirements engineering: Synchronising models in an air traffic management case study. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 368-383. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
28. Mylopoulos, J.: Information modeling in the time of the revolution. Information Systems 23, 127-155 (1998)
29. Kaindl, H., Brinkkemper, S., Bubenko Jr., J.A., Farbey, B., Greenspan, S.J., Heitmeyer, C.L., Leite, J.C.S.d.P., Mead, N.R., Mylopoulos, J., Siddiqi, J.: Requirements Engineering and Technology Transfer: Obstacles, Incentives and Improvement Agenda. Requirements Engineering 7, 113-123 (2002)
30. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28, 75-105 (2004)
31. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution. Harper Business, New York (1994)
32. Nagayama, K., Weill, P.: Seven Eleven Japan: Reinventing the Retail Business Model. CISR Working Paper 338 - MIT Sloan WP 4485-04 (2004)
33. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edn., vol. 5. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2009)
34. Grau, G., Franch, X., Maiden, N.A.M.: PRiM: An i*-based process reengineering method for information systems specification. Information and Software Technology 50, 76-100 (2008)