High-severity wildfire effects on carbon stocks and emissions in fuels treated and untreated forest

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 261, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1115-1120

  North, Malcolm P ^a,b   Hurteau, Matthew D ^c  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon storage; Climate change mitigation; Disturbance; Fire severity; Forest management; Sierra Nevada; Tree mortality

Indexed keywords

CARBON STORAGE; CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION; DISTURBANCE; FIRE SEVERITY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; SIERRA NEVADA; TREE MORTALITY;

DECOMPOSITION; ECOLOGY; FIRES; FORESTRY; FUEL STORAGE; FUELS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAMETER; DISTURBANCE; EMISSION CONTROL; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FUEL; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT; TRADE-OFF; WILDFIRE;

CANADA; CARBON; DECAY; ECOLOGY; FOREST FIRES; FOREST MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; SEASONAL VARIATION; STORAGE;

CALIFORNIA; SIERRA NEVADA [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79551551423     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.039     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Agee J.K., Skinner C.N. Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 2005, 211:83-96.
2. 2 at northern latitudes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1993, 23:1528-1536.
3. Bowman D.M., Balch J.K., Artaxo P., Bond W.J., Carlson J.M., Cochrane M.A., D'Antonio C.M., DeFries R.S., Doyle J.C., Hanrrison S.P., Johnston F.H., Keeley J.E., Krawchuk M.A., Kull C.A., Marston J.B., Moritz M.A., Prentices I.C., Roos C.I., Scott A.C., Swetnam T.W., van der Werf G.R., Pyne S.J. Fire in the earth system. Science 2009, 324:481-484.
4. Brown J.K. Handbook for Inventorying Downed Woody Material 1974, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT, (Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-16).
5. Campbell J., Donato D., Azuma D., Law B. Pyrogenic carbon emissions from a large wildfire in Oregon, United States. Journal of Geophysical Research 2007, 112:G04014. 10.1029/2007JG00045.
6. Canadell J.G., Raupach M.R. Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 2008, 320:1456-1457.
7. 2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2007, 104:18866-18870.
8. 2 exchange of a ponderosa pine forest. Global Change Biology 2008, 14:1-20.
9. Fahey T.J., Woodbury P.B., Battles J.J., Goodale C.L., Hamburg S.P., Ollinger S.C., Woodall C.W. Forest carbon storage: ecology, management, and policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2010, 8:245-252.
10. FAO Global Forest Resource Assessment 2005, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
11. FAO Fire Management Global Assessment 2006, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, FAO Forestry Paper 151.
12. Fellows A.W., Goulden M.L. Has fire suppression increased the amount of carbon stored in western U.S. forests?. Geophysical Research Letters 2008, 28:2077-2080.
13. Finkral A.J., Evans A.M. The effects of a thinning treatment on carbon stocks in a northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Forest Ecology and Management 2008, 255:2743-2750.
14. Galik C.S., Jackson R.B. Risks to forest carbon offset projects in a changing climate. Forest Ecology and Management 2009, 257:2209-2216.
15. Harmon M., Cromack K., Smith B.G. Coarse woody debris in mixed-conifer forests, Sequoia National Park, California. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1987, 17:1265-1272.
16. Hudiburg T., Law B., Turner D.P., Campbell J., Donato D., Duane M. Carbon dynamics of Oregon and Northern California forests and potential land-based carbon storage. Ecological Applications 2009, 19:163-180.
17. Hurteau M.D., North M.P. Mixed-conifer understory response to climate change, nitrogen, and fire. Global Change Biology 2008, 14:1543-1552.
18. Hurteau M.D., North M.P. Fuel treatment effects on tree-based forest carbon storage and emissions under modeled wildfire scenarios. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2009, 7:409-414.
19. Hurteau M., North M. Carbon recovery rates following different wildfire risk mitigation treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 2010, 260:930-937.
20. Hurteau M.D., Stoddard M.T., Fulé P.Z. The carbon costs of mitigating high-severity wildfire in southwestern ponderosa pine. Global Change Biology 2010, 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02295.x.
21. Jenkins J.C., Chojnacky D.C., Heath L.S., Birdsey R.S. Comprehensive Database of Diameter-Based Biomass Regressions for North American Tree Species 2004, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newton Square, PA, (Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-319).
22. Keith H., Mackey B.G., Lindenmayer D.B. Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world's most carbon-dense forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2009, 106:11635-11640.
23. Meigs G.W., Campbell J.L. Comment on " prescribed fire as a means of reducing forest carbon emissions in the Western United States" Environmental Science and Technology 2010, 44:6520.
24. Meigs G.W., Donato D.C., Campbell J.L., Martin J.G., Law B.E. Forest fire impacts on carbon uptake, storage, and emission: the role of burn severity in the Eastern Cascades, Oregon. Ecosystems 2009, 12:1246-1267.
25. Miller J.D., Safford H.D., Crimmins M., Thode A.E. Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Ecosystems 2009, 12:16-32.
26. Mitchell S.R., Harmon M.E., O'Connell K.E.B. Forest fuel reduction alters fire severity and long-term carbon storage in three Pacific Northwest ecosystems. Ecological Applications 2009, 19:643-655.
27. North M., Hurteau M., Innes J. Fire suppression and fuels treatment effects on mixed-conifer carbon stocks and emissions. Ecological Applications 2009, 19:1385-1396.
28. North M., Stine P., Zielinski W., O'Hara K., Stephens S. Harnessing fire for wildlife. The Wildlife Professional 2010, 4:30-33.
29. Penman J.M., Gytarzky M., Hiraishi M., Krug T., Kruger D., Ripatti R., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T., Tanabe K., Wagner F. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry 2003, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan.
30. Prichard S.J., Peterson D.L., Jacobson K. Fuel treatments reduce the severity of wildfire effects in dry mixed conifer forest, Washington, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2010, 40:1615-1626.
31. Reinhardt E., Holsinger S. Effects of fuel treatments on carbon-disturbance relationships in forests of the northern Rocky Mountains. Forest Ecology and Management 2010, 259:1427-1435.
32. Safford H.D., Schmidt D.A., Carlson C.H. Effects of fuel treatments on fire severity in an area of wildland-urban interface, Angora Fire, Lake Tahoe Basin, California. Forest Ecology and Management 2009, 258:773-787.
33. Smith J.E., Heath L.S. A Model of Forest Floor Carbon Biomass for United States Forest Types 2002, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newton Square, PA, (Res. Paper NE-722).
34. Stephens S.L., Moghaddas J. Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted tree mortality in a California mixed conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 2005, 215:21-36.
35. Stephens S.L., Moghaddas J., Hartsough B., Moghaddas E.E.Y., Clinton N.E. Fuel treatment effects on stand level carbon pools, treatment related emissions, and fire risk in a Sierran mixed conifer forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2009, 39:1538-1547.
36. Stephens S.L., Millar C.I., Collins B.M. Operational approaches to managing forests of the future in Mediterranean regions within a context of changing climates. Environmental Research Letters 2010, 5:024003.
37. Taylor A.H., Skinner C.N. Spatial patterns and controls on historical fire regimes and forest structure in the Klamath Mountains. Ecological Applications 2003, 13:704-719.
38. van Mantgem P.J., Schwilk D.W. Negligible influence of spatial autocorrelation in the assessment of fire effects in a mixed conifer forest. Fire Ecology 2009, 5:116-125.
39. van Wagtendonk J.W., Moore P.E. Fuel deposition rates of montane and subalpine conifers in the central Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 2010, 259:2122-2132.
40. van Wagtendonk J.W., Benedict J.M., Sydoriak W.M. Physical properties of woody fuel particles of Sierra Nevada Conifers. International Journal of Wildland Fire 1996, 6:117-123.
41. van Wagtendonk J.W., Benedict J.M., Sydoriak W.M. Fuel bed characteristics of Sierra Nevada Conifers. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 1998, 13:73-84.
42. Westerling A.L., Bryant B.P. Climate change and wildfire in California. Climatic Change 2008, 87(Suppl. 1):S231-S249.
43. Westerling A.L., Hidalgo H.G., Cayan D.R., Swetnam T.W. Warming and earlier spring increases western U.S. forest wildfire activity. Science 2006, 313:940-943.
44. Wiedinmyer C., Hurteau M.D. Prescribed fire as a means of reducing forest carbon emissions in the western United State. Environmental Science and Technology 2010, 44:1926-1932.