Carbon recovery rates following different wildfire risk mitigation treatments

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 260, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 930-937

  Hurteau, Matthew D ^a   North, Malcolm ^b  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon; Climate change; Fuels treatment; Mitigation; Wildfire

Indexed keywords

CARBON ACCUMULATION; CARBON RECOVERY; CARBON STOCKS; CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION; FUELS TREATMENT; MECHANICAL THINNING; MIXED-CONIFER FORESTS; OVERSTORY-THIN; POST TREATMENT; PRESCRIBED FIRES; RECOVERY TIME; REDUCTION TREATMENT; RISK MITIGATION; SIERRA NEVADA; TEMPERATE FORESTS; THINNING TREATMENT; TREE GROWTH; UNDERSTORY-THIN;

FIRES; FORESTRY; FUELS; RECOVERY;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONIFEROUS FOREST; EMISSION CONTROL; FORESTRY MODELING; FUEL; GROWTH RATE; MITIGATION; OVERSTORY; RISK; TEMPERATE FOREST; THINNING; UNDERSTORY; WILDFIRE;

CARBON; CLIMATES; EMISSION; FOREST FIRES; FORESTS; FUELS; RECOVERY;

CALIFORNIA; SIERRA NEVADA [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES;

CONIFEROPHYTA;

EID: 77954954079     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.015     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Brown J.K. Handbook for Inventorying Downed Woody Material 1974, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT, (Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-16).
2. Brown P.M., Kaufmann M.R., Shepperd W.D. Long-term, landscape patterns of past fire events in a montane ponderosa pine forest of central Colorado. Landscape Ecology 1999, 14:513-532.
3. Campbell J., Alberti G., Martin J., Law B.E. Carbon dynamics of a ponderosa pine plantation following a thinning treatment in the northern Sierra Nevada. Forest Ecology and Management 2009, 257:453-463.
4. Canadell J.G., Raupach M.R. Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 2008, 320:1456.
5. Climate Action Reserve, 2009. http://www.climateactionreserve.org/how/protocols/adopted/forest/current/.
6. DeLuca T.H., Aplet G.H. Charcoal and carbon storage in forest soils of the Rocky Mountain west. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2008, 6:18-24.
7. Everett R.L., Schellhaas R., Keenum D., Spurbeck D., Ohlson P. Fire history in the ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir forests on the east slope of the Washington Cascades. Forest Ecology and Management 2000, 129:207-225.
8. Fajardo A., Graham J.M., Goodburn J.M., Fiedler C.E. Ten-year responses of ponderosa pine growth, vigor, and recruitment to restoration treatments in the Bitteroot Mountains, Montana, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 2007, 243:50-60.
9. Fellows A.W., Goulden M.L. Has fire suppression increased the amount of carbon stored in western U.S. forests?. Geophysical Research Letters 2008, 35:L12404.
10. Fiedler C.E, Keegan C.E. Reducing crown fire hazard in fire-adapted forests of New Mexico. Fire, Fuel Treatments, and Ecological Restoration: Conference Proceedings; 2002. Proceedings RMRS-P-29 2003, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. P.N. Omi, L.A. Joyce (Eds.).
11. Finkral A.J., Evans A.M. The effects of a thinning treatment on carbon stocks in a northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Forest Ecology and Management 2008, 255:2743-2750.
12. Fulé P.Z., McHugh C., Heinlein T.A., Covington W.W. Potential fire behavior is reduced following forest restoration treatments. Ponderosa pine ecosystem restoration and conservation: steps toward stewardship; Proceedings RMRS-P-22 2001, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Flagstaff, AZ. R.K. Vance, C.B. Edminster, W.W. Covington, J.A. Blake (Eds.).
13. Galik C.S., Jackson R.B. Risks to forest carbon offset projects in a changing climate. Forest Ecology and Management 2009, 257:2209-2216.
14. Harmon M.E., Cromack K., Smith B.G. Coarse woody debris in mixed-conifer forests, Sequoia National Park, California. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1987, 17:1265-1272.
15. Hudiburg T., Law B., Turner D.P., Campbell J., Donato D., Duane M. Carbon dynamics of Oregon and Northern California forests and potential land-based carbon storage. Ecological Applications 2009, 19:163-180.
16. Hurteau M., North M. Mixed-conifer understory response to climate change, nitrogen, and fire. Global Change Biology 2008, 14:1543-1552.
17. Hurteau M., North M. Fuel treatment effects on tree-based forest carbon storage and emissions under modeled wildfire scenarios. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2009, 7.
18. Hurteau M.D., Hungate B.A., Koch G.W. Accounting for risk in valuing forest carbon offsets. Carbon Balance and Management 2009, 4:1.
19. Hurteau M.D., Koch G.W., Hungate B.A. Carbon protection and fire risk reduction: toward a full accounting of forest carbon offsets. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2008, 6:493-498.
20. Hurteau M.D., North M., Foin T. Modeling the influence of precipitation and nitrogen deposition on forest understory fuel connectivity in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Ecological Modelling 2009, 220:2460-2468.
21. Hurtt G.C., Pacala S.W., Moorcroft P.R., Caspersen J., Shevliakova E., Houghton R.A., Moore B. Projecting the future of the U.S. carbon sink. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2002, 99:1389-1394.
22. Husch B., Miller C.I., Beers T.W. Forest Mensuration 1993, Krieger Publishing, Malabar, FL.
23. Innes J.C., North M.P., Williamson N. Effect of thinning and prescribed fire restoration treatments on woody debris and snag dynamics in a Sierran old-growth, mixed-conifer forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2006, 36:3783-3793.
24. Jenkins J.C., Chojnacky D.C., Heath L.S., Birdsey R.A. Comprehensive Database of Diameter-based Biomass Regressions for North American Tree Species 2004, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newton Square, PA, (Gen Tech. Rep. NE-319).
25. Keith H., Mackey B.G., Lindenmayer D.B. Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world's most carbon-dense forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106:11635-11640.
26. Latham P., Tappeiner J. Response of old-growth conifers to reduction in stand density in western Oregon forests. Tree Physiology 2002, 22:137-146.
27. Maser C., Anderson R.G., Cromack K., Williams J.T., Martin R.E. Dead and down material. Wildlife Habitats in Managed Forests: The Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington USDA Agriculture Handbook 553 1979, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA, pp. 78-95.
28. McDowell N.G., Adams H.D., Bailey J.D., Hess M., Kolb T.E. Homeostatic maintenance of ponderosa pine gas exchange in response to stand density changes. Ecological Applications 2006, 16:1164-1182.
29. McKelvey K.S., Busse K.K. Twentieth-centure fire patterns on Forest Service lands. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress 1996, vol. II, Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options. University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, Davis, pp. 1119-1138.
30. Mignone B.K., Hurteau M.D., Chen Y., Sohngen B. Carbon offsets, reversal risk and US climate policy. Carbon Balance and Management 2009, 4:3.
31. Miller J.D., Safford H.D., Crimmins M., Thode A.E. Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada. USA Ecosystems 2009, 12:16-32.
32. Mitchell S.R., Harmon M.E., O'Connell K.E.B. Forest fuel reduction alters fire severity and long-term carbon storage in three Pacific Northwest ecosystems. Ecological Applications 2009, 19:643-655.
33. North M., Chen J., Smith G., Krakowiak L., Franklin J. Initial response of understory plant diversity and overstory tree diameter growth to a green tree retention harvest. Northwest Science 1996, 70:24-35.
34. North M., Hurteau M., Fiegener R., Barbour M. Influence of fire and El Niño on tree recruitment varies by species in Sierran mixed conifer. Forest Science 2005, 51:187-197.
35. North M., Hurteau M., Innes J. Fire suppression and fuels treatment effects on mixed-conifer carbon stocks and emissions. Ecological Applications 2009, 19:1385-1396.
36. North M., Oakley B., Chen J., Erickson H., Gray A., Izzo A., Johnson D., Ma S., Marra J., Meyer M., Purcell K., Rambo T., Rizzo D., Roath B., Schowalter T. Vegetation and Ecological Characteristics of Mixed-conifer and Red Fir Forests at the Teakettle Experimental Forest 2002, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agricultrue, Albany, CA, (Gen Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-186).
37. Penman J.M., Gytarzky M., Hiraishi M., Krug T., Kruger D., Pipatti R., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T., Tanabe K., Wagner F. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry 2003, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan.
38. Richter D.d., Jenkins D.H., Karakash J.T., Knight J., McCreery L.R., Nemestothy K.P. Wood energy in America. Science 2009, 323:1432-1433.
39. Rundel P.W., Parsons D.J., Gordon D.T. Montane and subalpine vegetation of the Sierra Nevada and Cascade Ranges. Terrestrial Vegetation of California 1988, California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. M.G. Barbour, J. Major (Eds.).
40. Ryu S.-R., Concilio A., Chen J., North M., Ma S. Prescribed burning and mechanical thinning effects on belowground conditions and soil respiration in a mixed-conifer forest, California. Forest Ecology and Management 2009, 257:1324-1332.
41. Sala A., Peters G.D., McIntyre L.R., Harrington M.G. Physiological responses of ponderosa pine in western Montana to thinning, prescribed fire and burning season. Tree Physiology 2005, 25:339-348.
42. Skov K.R., Kolb T.E., Wallin K.F. Difference in radial growth response to restoration thinning and burning treatments between young and old ponderosa pine in Arizona. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 2005, 20:36-43.
43. Smith J.E., Heath L.S. A Model of Forest Floor Carbon Biomass for United States Forest Types 2002, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newton Square, PA, (Res. Paper NE-722).
44. SNFPA Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment: Final Environmental Impact Statement 2004, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Vallejo, CA.
45. Stephens S.L. Evaluation of the effects of fuels treatments on potential fire behaviour in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. Forest Ecology and Management 1998, 105:21-35.
46. Stephens S.L., Moghaddas J.J. Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted tree mortality in a California mixed conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 2005, 215:21-36.
47. Stephens S.L., Moghaddas J.J., Hartsough B.R., Moghaddas E.E.Y., Clinton N.E. Fuel treatment effects on stand-level carbon pools, treatment-related emissions, and fire risk in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2009, 39:1538-1547.
48. Swetnam T.W., Betancourt J.L. Fire-southern oscillation relations in the southwestern United States. Science 1990, 249:1017-1020.
49. Taylor A.H., Beaty R.M. Climatic influences on fire regimes in the northern Sierra Nevada mountains, Lake Tahoe Basin, Nevada, USA. Journal of Biogeography 2005, 32:425-438.
50. Taylor A.H., Skinner C.N. Spatial patterns and controls on historical fire regimes and forest structure in the Klamath Mountains. Ecological Applications 2003, 13:704-719.
51. van Wagtendonk J.W., Moore P.E. Fuel deposition rates of montane and subalpine conifers in the central Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 2010, 259:2122-2132.
52. Verner J., McKelvey K.S., Noon B.R., Gutierrez R.J., Gould G.I., Beck T.W. The California Spotted Owl: A Technical Assessment of its Current Status 1992, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA, (Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-133).
53. Voluntary Carbon Standard Guidance for Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use Projects 2007, Voluntary Carbon Standard, Geneva, Switzerland.
54. Wayman R.B., North M. Initial response of a mixed-conifer understory plant community to burning and thinning restoration treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 2007, 239:32-44.
55. Westerling A.L., Bryant B.P. Climate change and wildfire in California. Climatic Change 2008, 87(Suppl. 1):S231-S249.
56. Wiedinmyer C., Hurteau M.D. Prescribed fire as a means of reducing forest carbon emissions in the western U.S. Environmental Science and Technology 2010, 44:1926-1932.
57. 2 from fires in the United States: implications for carbon management. Carbon Balance and Management 2007, 2:10.
58. Wiedinmyer C., Quayle B., Geron C., Belote A., McKenzie D., Zhang X., O'Neill S., Wynne K.K. Estimating emissions from fires in North America for air quality monitoring. Atmospheric Environment 2006, 40:3419-3432.