Lodgepole pine: The first evidence of seed-based somatic embryogenesis and the expression of embryogenesis marker genes in shoot bud cultures of adult trees

Tree Physiology

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1469-1478

  Park, So Young ^a   Klimaszewska, Krystyna ^b   Park, Ji Young ^c   Mansfield, Shawn D ^c  

^a Korea Forest Research Institute   (South Korea)

^b LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

gene expression; HAP3A; in vitro culture; Pinus contorta; recalcitrance; somatic embryos; somatic seedlings; WOX

Indexed keywords

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ADULT; CELL ORGANELLE; CONIFEROUS TREE; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; EMBRYO; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC MARKER; GENOTYPE; MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; SEED PROPAGATION; SEEDLING;

ARTICLE; CELL LINE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; PINE; PLANT; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; SEEDLING; SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS; TIME;

CELL LINE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOTYPE; PHENOTYPE; PINUS; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANT SHOOTS; PLANT SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS TECHNIQUES; SEEDLING; TIME FACTORS;

COLEOPTERA; CONIFEROPHYTA; PINUS CONTORTA; PINUS MUGO;

EID: 79551544228     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: 17584469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpq081     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Al-Khayri, J. M. and A. M. Al-Bahran. 2004. Genotype-dependent in vitro response of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars to silver nitrate. Sci. Hortic. 99:153-162.
2. Andersone, U. and G. Ievinsh. 2002. Changes of morphological competence in mature Pinus sylvestris L. buds in vitro. Ann. Bot. 90:293-298.
3. Aronen, T., T. Pehkonen, R. Malabadi and L. Ryynänen. 2008. Somatic embryogenesis of Scots pine-advances in pine tissue culture at Metla. Wor. Pap. Finn. For. Res. Ins. 114:68-71.
4. Azevedo, H., T. Lino-Neto and R. M. Tavares. 2003. An improved method for high-quality RNA isolation from needles of adult maritime pine trees. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 21:333-338.
5. Bonga, J. M. 1997. The effect of collection date and frozen storage on the formation of embryo-like structures and elongating shoots from explants from mature Larix decidua and L. x eurolepis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 51:195-200.
6. Bonga, J. M. and P. von Aderkas. 1992. In vitro culture of trees. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 236 p.
7. Bonga, J. M., K. Klimaszewska and P. von Aderkas. 2010. Recalcitrance in clonal propagation, in particular of conifers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 100:241-254.
8. Cairney, J., L. Zheng, A. Cowels, et al. 2006. Expressed sequence tags from loblolly pine embryos reveal similarities with angiosperm embryogenesis. Plant Mol. Biol. 62:485-501.
9. Elo, A., J. Immanen, K. Nieminen and Y. Helariutta. 2009. Stem cell functions during plant vascular development. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 20:1097-1106.
10. Gaj, M. D., S. Zhang, J. J. Harada and P. G. Lemaux. 2005. Leafy cotyledon genes are essential for induction of somatic embryogenesis of Arabidopsis. Planta 222:977-988.
11. Gupta, P. K. and D. J. Durzan. 1985. Shoot multiplication from mature trees of Douglas-fir and sugar pine. Plant Cell Rep. 4:177-179.
12. Harvengt, L., J. F. Trontin, I. Reymond, F. Canlet and M. Paques. 2001. Molecular evidence of true-to-type propagation of a 3-year-old Norway spruce through somatic embryogenesis. Planta 213:828-832.
13. Kiselev, K. V., A. V. Turlenko and Y. N. Zhuravlev. 2009. PgWUS expression during somatic embryo development in a Panax ginseng 2c3 cell culture expressing the rolC oncogene. Plant Growth Reg. 59:237-243.
14. Klimaszewska, K., Y.-S. Park, C. Overton, I. MacEacheron and J. M. Bonga. 2001. Optimized somatic embryogenesis in Pinus strobus L. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 37:392-399.
15. Klimaszewska, K., J. F. Trontin, M. R. Becwar, C. Devillard, Y.-S. Park and M.-A. Lelu-Walter. 2007. Recent progress in somatic embryogenesis of four Pinus spp. Tree For. Sci. Biotechnol. 1:11-25.
16. Klimaszewska, K., C. Overton and D. Stewart. 2009. Rejuvenation of 7 years old Picea glauca somatic trees from shoot bud explants and expression dynamic of several transcription factors during culture. In Abstract 2009 IUFRO Tree Biotech Conference, 28 June-2 July 2009, Whistler, BC, Canada.
17. Komamine, A., N. Murata and K. Nomura. 2005. Mechanisms of somatic embryogenesis in carrot suspension cultures-morphology, physiology, biochemistry, and molecular biology. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 41:6-10.
18. Lelu-Walter, M. A., M. Bernier-Cardou and K. Klimaszewska. 2006. Simplified and improved somatic embryogenesis for clonal propagation of Pinus pinaster (Ait.). Plant Cell Rep. 25:767-776.
19. Litvay, J. D., D. C. Verma and M. A. Johnson. 1985. Influence of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) culture medium and its components on growth and somatic embryogenesis of the wild carrot (Daucus carota). Plant Cell Rep. 4:325-328.
20. Malik, M. R., F. Wang, J. M. Dirpaul, N. Zhou, P. L. Polowick, A. M. R. Ferrie and J. E. Krochko. 2007. Transcript profiling and identification of molecular markers for early microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus. Plant Physiol. 144:134-154.
21. McCown, B. 2000. Recalcitrance of woody and herbaceous perennial plants: dealing with genetic predeterminism. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 36:149-154.
22. Merkle, S. A., K. A. Neu, P. J. Battle and R. L. Bailey. 1998. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from immature and mature tissues of sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). Plant Sci. 132:169-178.
23. Monteuuis, O. 1991. Rejuvenation of a 100-year-old Sequoiadendron giganteum through in vitro meristem culture. I. Organogenic and morphological arguments. Physiol. Plant. 81:111-115.
24. Niskanen, A.-M., J. Lu, S. Seitz, K. Keinonen, K. von Weissenberg and A. Pappinen. 2004. Effect of parent genotype on somatic embryogenesis in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Tree Physiol. 24:1259-1265.
25. Nissen, P. and S. C. Minocha. 1993. Inhibition by 2, 4-D of somatic embryogenesis in carrot as explored by its reversal by difluromethylornithine. Physiol. Plant. 89:673-680.
26. Palovaara, J. and I. Hakman. 2008. Conifer WOX-related homeodomain transcription factors, developmental consideration and expression dynamic of WOX2 during Picea abies somatic embryogenesis. Plant Mol. Biol. 66:533-549.
27. Palovaara, J., H. Hallberg, C. Stasolla and I. Hakman. 2010. Comparative expression pattern analysis of WUSCHEL-related homeobox 2 (WOX2) and WOX8/9 in developing seeds and somatic embryos of the gymnosperm Picea abies. New Phytol. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03336.x.
28. Park, Y. S., M. A. Lelu-Walter, L. Harvengt, J. F. Trontin, I. MacEacheron, K. Klimaszewska and J. M. Bonga. 2006. Initiation of somatic embryogenesis in Pinus banksiana, P. strobus, P. pinaster, and P. sylvestris at three laboratories in Canada and France. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 86:87-101.
29. Schrader, S., R. Kaldenhoff and G. Richter. 1997. Expression of novel genes during somatic embryogenesis of suspensioncultured carrot cells (Daucus carota). J. Plant Physiol. 150:63-68.
30. Suprasanna, P. and V. A. Bapat. 2005. Differntial gene expression during somatic embryogenesis. In Somatic Embryogenesis (Plant Cell Monographs), Eds. A. Mujib and J. Šamaj. Springer, Berlin, pp 305-320.
31. Verdeil, J. L., L. Alemanno, N. Niemenak and T. J. Trangarder. 2007. Pluripotent versus totipotent plant stem cells: dependence versus autonomy? Trends Plant Sci. 12:245-250.
32. von Aderkas, P. and J. M. Bonga. 2000. Influencing micropropagation and somatic embryogenesis in mature trees by manipulation of phase change, stress and culture environment. Tree Physiol. 20:921-928.
33. Whelan, J. A., N. B. Russell and M. A. Whelan. 2003. A method for the absolute quantification of c-DNA using real-time PCR. J. Immunol. Methods 278:261-269.
34. Yazawa, K., K. Takahata and H. Kamada. 2004. Isolation of the gene encoding carrot leafy cotyledon1 and expression analysis during somatic and zygotic embryogenesis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 42:215-223.
35. Zeng, F., X. Zhang, L. Cheng, L. Hu, L. Zhu, J. Cao and X. Guo. 2007. A draft gene regulatory network for cellular totipotency reprogramming during plant somatic embryogenesis. Genomics 90:620-628.