The feasibility of Web-based surveys as a data collection tool: A process evaluation

Applied Nursing Research

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 37-44

  Chizawsky, Lesa L K ^a   Estabrooks, Carole A ^b   Sales, Anne E ^b  

^a STOLLERY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN NURSING; PEDIATRIC NURSING;

CANADA; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DATA COLLECTION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTERNET; NEONATAL NURSING; PEDIATRIC NURSING;

EID: 79551532092     PISSN: 08971897     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2009.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. AbuAlrub R.F. Job stress, job performance, and social support among hospital nurses. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2004, 36(1):73-78.
2. Akl E.A., Maroun N., Klocke R.A., Montori V., Schunemann H.J. Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2005, 58(4):425-429.
3. Beebe T.J., Locke R., Barnes S.A., Davern M.E., Anderson K.J. Mixing Web and mail methods in a survey of physicians. Health Services Research 2007, 42(3):1219-1234.
4. Bjornsdottir G., Thorhallsdottir I. An Internet-based survey of Icelandic nurses on their use of and attitudes toward NANDA, NIC, and NOC. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications 2003, 14(4):32-33.
5. Bond G.E. Lessons learned from the implementation of a Web-based nursing intervention. Computers, Informatics, Nursing: CIN 2006, 24(2):66-74.
6. Dillman D.A. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method 2007, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ. (2nd ed.).
7. Dillman D.A., Smyth J.D. Design effects in the transition to Web-based surveys. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2007, 32(5S):90-96.
8. Estabrooks C.A., Squires J.E., Adachi A.M., Kong L., Norton P.G. Utilization of health research in acute care settings in Alberta Technical Report (Report 08-01-TR) 2008, University of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton, AB.
9. Feudtner C., Santucci G., Feinstein J.A., Snyder C.R., Rourke M.T., Kang T.I. Hopeful thinking and level of comfort regarding providing pediatric palliative care: A survey of hospital nurses. Pediatrics 2007, 119(1):186-192.
10. Kittleson M.J. Suggestions for using the Web to collect data. American Journal of Health Behavior 2003, 27(2):170-172.
11. Lancaster G.A., Dodd S., Williamson P.R. Design and analysis of pilot studies: Recommendations for good practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2004, 10(2):307-312.
12. Lee T.T., Lin K.C., Lin J.S. Development and testing of an evaluation scale of personal digital assistants. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2007, 25(3):171-179.
13. Lusk C., Delclos G.L., Burau K., Drawhorn D.D., Aday L.A. Mail versus Internet surveys: Determinants of method of response preferences among health professionals. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2007, 30(2):186-201.
14. Maslach C., Jackson S.E., Leiter M.P. Maslach Burnout Inventory manual 1996, CPP, Mountain View, CA. 3rd ed.
15. Nyatanga B. Do pilot studies have any value in research?. International Journal of Palliative Nursing 2005, 11(7):312.
16. O'Brien-Pallas L., Irvine D., Peereboom E., Murray M. Measuring nursing workload: Understanding the variability. Nursing Economics 1997, 15(4):171-182.
17. O'Brien-Pallas L.L., Doran D.I., Murray M., Cockerill R., Sidani S., Laurie-Shaw B., et al. Evaluation of a client care delivery model, part 1: Variability in nursing utilization in community home nursing. Nursing Economics 2001, 19(6):267-276.
18. O'Brien-Pallas, L. L., Doran, D. I., Murray, M., Cockerill, R., Sidani, S., Laurie-Shaw, B., et al. (2002). Evaluation of a client care delivery model, part 2: Variability in client outcomes in community home nursing. Nursing Economics, 20(1), 13-21, 36.
19. Quigley B., Riemer R.A., Cruzen D.E., Rosen S. Internet versus paper survey administration: Preliminary findings on response rates 2000, November.
20. Truell A.D., Bartlett J.E., Alexander M.W. Response rate, speed, and completeness: A comparison of Internet-based and mail surveys. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2002, 34(1):46-49.
21. Villanueva N.E., Thompson H.J., Macpherson B.C., Meunier K.E., Hilton E. The neuroscience nursing 2005 role delineation study: Implications for certification. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 2006, 38(6):403-415.
22. Ware J.E., Kosinski M., Dewey J.E., Gandek B. How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: A manual for users of the SF-8 health survey 2001, QualityMetric, Lincoln, RI.
23. Warren, J. I. (2005). Organizational incentives and rewards as motivators for registered nurses to obtain a baccalaureate or higher nursing degree. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, 2005). Dissertation Abstracts International, 65(11), 5637B.
24. Yeaworth R.C. Use of the Internet in survey research. Journal of Professional Nursing 2001, 17(4):187-193.