Lessons learned from the implementation of a web-based nursing intervention

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 66-74

  Bond, Gail E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Challenges; Implementation; Web evaluation; Web intervention

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DIABETES MELLITUS; EDUCATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING INFORMATICS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; PERSONNEL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; TEACHING; TELEMEDICINE;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPUTER LITERACY; COMPUTER USER TRAINING; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FOCUS GROUPS; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; INTERNET; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING INFORMATICS; PATIENT EDUCATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUPPORT; TELEMEDICINE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33645282238     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00024665-200603000-00004     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Kirsch SE, Lewis FM. Using the World Wide Web in health-related intervention research. A review of controlled trials. Comput Inform Nurs. 2004;22(1):8-18.
2. Flatley-Brennan P, Moore SM, Bjornsdottir G, Jones J, Visovsky C, Rogers M. Heartcare: an Internet-based information and support system for patient home recovery after coronary artery bypass graft. J Adv Nurs. 2001;35(5):699-708.
3. Weinberg N, Schmale JD, Uken J, Wessel K. Online help: cancer patients participate in a computer-mediated support group. Health Soc Work. 1996;21(1):24-29.
4. Jones R, Pearson J, McGregor S, et al. Randomized trial of personal computer based information for cancer patients. BMJ. 1999;319(7219):1241-1247.
5. Smith L, Weinert C. Telecommunication support for rural women with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2000;26(4):645-655.
6. Finkelstein J, O'Connor G, Friedmann RH. Development and implementation of the home asthma telemonitoring (HAT) system to facilitate asthma self-care. Medinfo. 2001;10(pt 1):810-814.
7. Edworthy SM, Devins GM. Improving medication adherence through patient education distinguishing between appropriate and inappropriate utilization of patient education study group. J Rheumatol. 1999;26(8):1647-1649.
8. Flatley-Brennan P. Computer network home care demonstrations: a randomized trial in persons living with AIDS. Comput Biol Med. 1998;28(5):489-508.
9. Hunkeler EM, Meresman JF, Hargreaves WA, et al. Efficacy a of nurse telehealthcare and peer support in augmenting the treatment of depression in primary care. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(8):700-708.
10. Lorig KR, Laurent DD, Deyo RA, et al. Can a back pain e-mail discussion group improve health status and lower healthcare costs? Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(7):792-796.
11. Jerant A, Azari R, Nesbitt TS. Reducing the cost of frequent hospital admissions for congestive heart failure: a randomized trial of a home telecare intervention. Med Care. 2001;39(11):1234-1245.
12. Johnston B, Wheeler L, Deuser J, Sousa KH. Outcomes of the Kaiser Permanente Tele-Home Health Research project. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(1):40-45.
13. Cudney SA, Weinert C. Computer-based support groups: nursing in cyberspace. Comput Nurs. 2000;18(1):35-43.
14. Hooper GS, Yellowlees P, Marwick TH, Currie PJ, Bidstrup BP. Telehealth and the diagnosis and management of cardiac disease. J Telemed Telecare. 2001;7(5):249-256.
15. Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Boberg E, et al. Impact of a patient-centered computer-based health information/support system. Am J Prev Med. 1999;16(1):1-9.
16. McKay HG, King D, Eakin EG, Seeley JR, Glasgow RE. The diabetes network Internet-based physical activity intervention. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(8):1328-1334.
17. Turnin MC, Beddok RH, Clottes JP, et al. Telematic expert system Diabeto: new tool for diet self-monitoring for diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1992;15(2):204-212.
18. Bakken S. Interactive health communication technology: where do clinical nursing interventions fit into the picture? Appl Nurs Res. 2001;14(3):173-176.
19. Estabrooks CA, O'Leary KA, Ricker KL, Humphrey CK. The Internet and access to evidence: how are nurses positioned? J Adv Nurs. 2003;42(1):73-81.
20. Hynes-Gay PM, Nagle LM. Nursing and the Net. Can J Nurs Leadersh. 2000;13(2):5-10.
21. Uhlenhopp MB, Fliedner MC, Morris P, VanBoxtel T. A global perspective on nurses' Internet access and information utilization. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998;25(suppl 10):27-32.
22. Desjardins KS, Cook SS, Jenkins M, Bakken S. Effect of an informatics for Evidence-based Practice Curriculum on nursing informatics competencies. Int J Med Inform. 2005 Dec;74(11-12): 1012-20. Epub 2005 August 24.
23. Berners-TL. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Web site. Guidelines from the World Wide Web Consortium for a more accessible Web site. Available at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/. Accessed April 16, 2005.
24. Echt KV. Designing Web-based health information for older adults: visual considerations and design directives. In: Morrell RW, ed. Older Adults, Health Information, and the World Wide Web. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002:61-88.
25. Morrell RW, Echt KV. Designing written instructions for older adults: learning to use computers. In: Fisk AD, Rogers WA, eds. Handbook of Human Factors and the Older Adult. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1997:335-361.
26. Microsoft Web site. Microsoft issues guidelines for making user-friendly Web sites for all ages. Available at: http://www.microsoft.com/PressPass/press/ 1999/May99/GuidelinePR.asp. Accessed April 16, 2005.
27. Sharit J, Czaja SJ. Ageing, computer-based task performance, and stress: issues and challenges. Ergonomics. 1994;37(4):559-577.
28. Kelly C, Charness N. Issues in training older adults to use computers. Behav Inf Technol. 1995;14(2):107-120.
29. Charness N. Aging and communication: human factors issues. In: Charness N, Parks DC, Sabel BA, eds. Communication, Technology, and Aging: Opportunities and Challenges for the Future. New York, NY: Springer Publishing; 2001:1-29.
30. Jamieson BA, Rogers WA. Age-related effects of blocked and random practice schedules on learning a new technology. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2000;55(6):P343-P353.
31. Westerman SJ, Davies DR. Acquisition and application of new technology skills: the influence of age. Occup Med (Lond). 2000;50(7):478-482.
32. Morrell RW, Park DC. The effects of age, illustrations, and task variables on the performance of procedural assembly tasks. Psychol Aging. 1993;8(3):389-399.
33. Shneiderman B. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Boston, MA: Pearson Addison Wesley; 2005.
34. McCracken D. User-Centered Website Development: A Human Computer Interaction Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2004.
35. Barnum C. Usability Testing and Research. New York, NY: Person Education; 2002.
36. Patel VL, Kushniruk AW Interface design for healthcare environments: the role of cognitive science [Review]. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:29-37.
37. Wharton C, Rieman J, Lewis C, Polson P. The cognitive walkthrough: a practitioner's guide. In: Nielsen J, Mack RL, eds. Usability Inspection Methods. New York, NY: Wiley; 1994:105-140.