The importance of checking for delayed reactions in pediatric patch testing

Pediatric Dermatology

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 12-14

  Matiz, Catalina ^b   Russell, Kathryn ^a   Jacob, Sharon E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

4 TERT BUTYLPHENOL; ALLERGEN; DIAZOLIDINYL UREA; EPOXY RESIN; FORMALDEHYDE; NEOMYCIN; QUATERNIUM 15;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATCH TEST; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; SKIN ALLERGY;

ADOLESCENT; ALLERGENS; CHILD; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATCH TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79551519281     PISSN: 07368046     EISSN: 15251470     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2010.01297.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Matiz C, Hsu JW, Paz Castanedo-Tardan M, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: a review of international studies. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 2009; 144: 541-556.
2. Zug KA, McGinley-Smith D, Warshaw EM, et al. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144: 1329-1336.
3. Jacob SE, Brod B, Crawford GH,. Clinically relevant patch test reactions in children-a United States based study. Pediatr Dermatol 2008; 25: 520-527.
4. Weston WL, Bruckner A,. Allergic contact dermatitis. Pediatr Clin North Am 2000; 47: 897-907. Vii.
5. Davis MD, Bhate K, Rohlinger AL, et al. Delayed patch test reading after 5 days: The Mayo Clinic experience. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 59: 225-233.
6. Dickel H, Taylor JS, Evey P, et al. Delayed readings of a standard screening patch test tray: frequency of "lost,""found," and "persistent" reactions. Am J Contact Dermat 2000; 11: 213-217.
7. Jonker MJ, Bruynzeel DP,. The outcome of an additional patch-test reading on days 6 or 7. Contact Dermat 2000; 42: 330-335.
8. Farrell AL, Warshaw EM, Zhao Y, et al. Prevalence and methodology of patch testing by allergists in the United States: results of a cross-sectional survey. Am J Contact Dermat 2002; 13: 157-163.
9. Warshaw EM, Nelson D,. Prevalence of patch testing and methodology of dermatologists in the US: results of a cross-sectional survey. Am J Contact Dermat 2002; 13: 53-58.
10. de Waard-van der Spek FB, Oranje AP,. Patch tests in children with suspected allergic contact dermatitis: a prospective study and review of the literature. Dermatology 2009; 218: 119-25.
11. Hogeling M, Pratt M,. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: the Ottawa hospital patch-testing clinic experience, 1996 to 2006. Dermatitis 2008; 19: 86-89.
12. The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics. No More Toxic Tub. Available at. (Accessed on May 25, 2009).
13. Pratt MD, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period. Dermatitis 2004; 15: 176-83.
14. Carlson S, Gipson K,. Nedorost S Relevance of doubtful late patch test readings. Dermatitis 2010; 21: 102-108.