Influence of bacteria on spinal implant-centered infection: An in vitro and in vivo experimental comparison between staphylococcus aureus and mycobacterium tuberculosis

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 103-108

  Chen, Wei Hua ^a   Jiang, Lei Sheng ^a   Dai, Li Yang ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

animal models; implant; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Spinal infection; Staphylococcus aureus

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; BACTERIAL COLONIZATION; BACTERIAL INFECTION; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BACTERIUM ISOLATION; BIOFILM; DOG; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INFECTION RATE; MALE; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; NONHUMAN; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

ANIMALS; BIOFILMS; DOG DISEASES; DOGS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SPINE; STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; TITANIUM; TUBERCULOSIS;

EID: 79551517584     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cb46ba     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Arens S, Schlegel U, Printzen G, et al. Infl uence of materials for fixation implants on local infection: an experimental study of steel versus titanium DCP in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:647-51.
2. Chang CC, Merritt K. Infection at the site of implanted materials with and without preadhered bacteria. J Orthop Res 1994;12:526-31.
3. Horn J, Schlegel U, Krettek C, et al. Infection resistance of unreamed solid, hollow slotted and cannulated intramedullary nails: an in-vivo experimental comparison. J Orthop Res 2005;23:810-5.
4. Matter P, Burch HB. Clinical experience with titanium implants, especially with the limited contact dynamic compression plate system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1990;109:311-3.
5. Perren SM. The concept of biological plating using the limited contactdynamic compression plate (LC-DCP): scientific background, design and application. Injury 1991;22(suppl 1):1-41.
6. Fukushima N, Yokoyama K, Sasahara T, et al. Establishment of rat model of acute staphylococcal osteomyelitis: relationship between inoculation dose and development of osteomyelitis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005;125:169-76.
7. Ha KY, Chung YG, Ryoo SJ. Adherence and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis on various spinal implants. Spine 2005;30:38-43.
8. Bapat MR, Lahiri VJ, Harshavardhan NS, et al. Role of transarticular screw fixation in tuberculous atlanto-axial instability. Eur Spine J 2007;16:187-97.
9. Benli IT, Alanay A, Akalin S, et al. Comparison of anterior instrumentation systems and the results of minimum 5 years followup in the treatment of tuberculosis spondylitis. Kobe J Med Sci 2004;50:167-80.
10. Benli IT, Acaroglu E, Akalin S, et al. Anterior radical debridement and anterior instrumentation in tuberculosis spondylitis. Eur Spine J 2003;12: 224-34.
11. Benli IT, Kis M, Akalin S, et al. The results of anterior radical debridement and anterior instrumentation in Pott disease and comparison with other surgical techniques. Kobe J Med Sci 2000;46:39-68.
12. Benli IT, Tuzuner M, Akalin S, et al. Spinal imbalance and decompensation problems in patients treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Eur Spine J 1996;5:380-6.
13. Guven O, Kumano K, Yalcin S, et al. A single stage posterior approach and rigid fixation for preventing kyphosis in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis. Spine 1994;19:1039-43.
14. Fukuta S, Miyamoto K, Masuda T, et al. Two-stage (posterior and anterior) surgical treatment using posterior spinal instrumentation for pyogenic and tuberculotic spondylitis. Spine 2003;8:E302-8.
15. Lee MC, Wang MY, Fessler RG, et al. Instrumentation in patients with spinal infection. Neurosurg Focus 2004;17:E7.
16. Lee TC, Lu K, Yang LC, et al. Transpedicular instrumentation as an adjunct in the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine tuberculosis with early stage bone destruction. J Neurosurg 1999;91:163-9.
17. Oga M, Arizono T, Takasita M, et al. Evaluation of the risk of instrumentation as a foreign body in spinal tuberculosis: clinical and biologic study. Spine 1993;18:1890-4.
18. Ozdemir HM, Us AK, Ogun T. The role of anterior spinal instrumentation and allograft fibula for the treatment of Pott disease. Spine 2003;28:474-9.
19. Sundararaj GD, Behera S, Ravi V, et al. Role of posterior stabilisation in the management of tuberculosis of the dorsal and lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85:100-6.
20. Yilmaz C, Selek HY, Gurkan I, et al. Anterior instrumentation for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:1261-7.
21. Lusk RH, Wienke EC, Milligan TW, et al. Tuberculous and foreignbody granulomatous reactions involving a total knee prosthesis. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:1325-7.
22. Wolfgang GL. Tuberculosis joint infection following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985;201:162-6.
23. Chaignon P, Sadovskaya I, Ragunah C, et al. Susceptibility of staphylococcal biofilms to enzymatic treatments depends on their chemical composition. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2007;75:125-32.
24. Flint SH, Brooks JD, Bremer PJ. The infl uence of cell surface properties of thermophilic streptococci on attachment to stainless steel. J Appl Microbiol 1997;83:508-17.
25. Barrett SP. Protein-mediated adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus to silicone implant polymer. J Med Microbiol 1985;20:249-53.
26. Chen WH, Jiang LS, Dai LY. A novel canine model of acute pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Neurosurg Rev 2009;32:485-90.
27. Arens S, Kraft C, Schlegel U, et al. Susceptibility to local infection in biological internal fixation: experimental study of open vs minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in rabbits. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999;119:82-5.
28. Melcher GA, Claudi B, Schlegel U, et al. Infl uence of type of medullary nail on the development of local infection: an experimental study of solid and slotted nails in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994;76:955-9.
29. Sadovskaya I, Chaignon P, Kogan G, et al. Carbohydrate-containing components of biofilms produced in vitro by some staphylococcal strains related to orthopaedic prosthesis infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2006; 47:75-82.
30. Sadovskaya I, Vinogradov E, Flahaut S, et al. Extracellular carbohydratecontaining polymers of a model biofilm-producing strain, Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A. Infect Immun 2005;73:3007-17.
31. Holderbaum D, Hall GS, Ehrhart LA. Collagen binding to Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 1986;54:359-64.
32. Tuli SM, Brighton CT, Morton HE, et al. The experimental induction of localised skeletal tuberculous lesions and their accessibility to streptomycin. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1974;56:551-9.
33. Barth E, Myrvik QM, Wagner W, et al. In vitro and in vivo comparative colonization of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococ cus epidermidis on orthopaedic implant materials. Biomaterials 1989;10:325-8.
34. Mylona E, Samarkos M, Kakalou E, et al. Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: a systematic review of clinical characteristics. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2009;39:10-17.
35. Luzzati R, Giacomazzi D, Danzi MC, et al. Diagnosis, management and outcome of clinically-suspected spinal infection. J Infect 2009;58:259-65.
36. Viale P, Furlanut M, Scudeller L, et al. Treatment of pyogenic (nontuberculous) spondylodiscitis with tailored high-dose levofl oxacin plus rifampicin. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009;33:379-82.
37. Weinstein MA, McCabe JP, Cammisa FP Jr. Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2,391 consecutive index procedures. J Spinal Disord 2000;13:422-6.
38. Levi AD, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK. Management of postoperative infections after spinal instrumentation. J Neurosurg 1997;86:975-80.
39. Mok JM, Guillaume TJ, Talu U, et al. Clinical outcome of deep wound infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion: a matched cohort analysis. Spine 2009;34:578-83.
40. Dai LY, Chen WH, Jiang LS. Anterior instrumentation for the treatment of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis of thoracic and lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 2008;17:1027-34.
41. Carragee E, Iezza A. Does acute placement of instrumentation in the treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis predispose to recurrent infection: long-term follow-up in immune-suppressed patients. Spine 2008;33:2089-93.
42. Shad A, Shariff S, Fairbank J, et al. Internal fixation for osteomyelitis of cervical spine: the issue of persistence of culture positive infection around the implants. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003;145:957-60.