Long-term hydrologic simulation using SCS-CN-based improved soil moisture accounting procedure

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 561-579

  Durbude, Dilip G ^a   Jain, Manoj K ^b   Mishra, Surendra K ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HYDROLOGY   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE   (India)

Author keywords

Antecedent moisture condition; Curve number; Initial soil moisture level; Long term hydrologic simulation models; Run off; Soil moisture accounting procedure; Stream flow

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES; ANTECEDENT MOISTURE; BASEFLOWS; CLIMATIC REGIONS; CURVE NUMBERS; HYDROLOGIC SIMULATION MODEL; HYDROLOGIC SIMULATIONS; IN-FIELD; INITIAL MOISTURE; INITIAL SOIL MOISTURE LEVEL; LONG-TERM HYDROLOGIC SIMULATION MODELS; SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE CURVE NUMBERS;

FLOW SIMULATION; HYDRAULICS; INFILTRATION; LANDFORMS; MOISTURE DETERMINATION; SOIL CONSERVATION; SOIL MOISTURE; STREAM FLOW; WATER SUPPLY; WATERSHEDS;

GEOLOGIC MODELS;

BASEFLOW; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FLOW MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; RUNOFF; SOIL MOISTURE; STREAMFLOW; WATERSHED;

INDIA;

EID: 79551470289     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7789     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Arnold JG, Allen PM, Bernhardt G. 1993. A comprehensive surface groundwater flow model. Journal of Hydrology 142: 47-69.
2. Arnold JG, Fohrer N. 2005. SWAT 2000. Current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrological Processes 19: 563-572.
3. Arnold JG, Williams JR, Nicks AD, Sammons NB. 1990. SWRRB-a basin scale simulation model for soil and water resources management. Texas A&M University Press: College Station, TX; 255.
4. ASCE. 1996. Hydrology Handbook. American Society of Civil Engineers: New York; 784.
5. Boughton WC. 1968. A mathematical model of estimating runoff. Journal of Hydrology (NZ) 7(2): 75-100.
6. Carsel R, Imhoff J, Hummel P, Cheplick J, Donigan A. 1997. PRZM 3·1 Users Manual. National Exposure Research Lab, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Athens, Georgia.
7. Choi JY, Engel BA, Chung HW. 2002. Daily stream flow modeling and assessment based on the curve number technique. Hydrological Processes 16: 3131-3150.
8. Donigian AS, Imhoff JC, Bicknell BR. 1983. Predicting Water Quality Resulting from Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution via Simulation-HSPF. Agricultural management and water quality, Iowa State University Press: Ames, Iowa; 200-249.
9. EI-Sadek A, Feyen J, Berlamont J. 2001. Comparison of models for computing drainage discharge. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-ASCE 127: 363-369.
10. Fentie B, Yu B, Silburn MD, Ciesiolka CAA. 2002. Evaluation of eight different methods to predict hillslope runoff rates for a grazing catchment in Australia. Journal of Hydrology 261: 102-114.
11. Gan TY, Dlamini EM, Bifu GF. 1997. Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling. Journal of Hydrology 192: 81-103.
12. Geetha K, Mishra SK, Eltho TI, Rastogi AK, Pandey RP. 2007. Modification to SCS-CN method for long term hydrologic simulation. Journal of Irrigation and Draianage Engineering, ASCE 133(5): 475-489.
13. Geetha K, Mishra SK, Eldho TI, Rastogi AK, Pandey RP. 2008. SCS-CN based continuous simulation model for hydrologic forecasting. Journal of Water Resources Management 22: 165-190.
14. Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO. 1999. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrology 4: 135-143.
15. Harbor JM. 1994. A practical method for estimating the impact of land use change on surface runoff, ground water recharge, and wet land hydrology. Journal of American Planning Association 60: 95-108.
16. Harmel RD, Cooper RJ, Slade RM, Haney RL, Arnold JG. 2006. Cumulative uncertainty in measured stream flow and water quality data for small watersheds. Transactions of ASABE 49: 689-701.
17. Hawkins RH. 1978. Runoff curve number with varying site moisture. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-ASCE 104: 389-398.
18. Hawkins RH, Hjemfelt AT, Zevenberger AW. 1985. Runoff probability, storm depth, and curve number. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 111: 330-340.
19. Jain MK, Singh VP. 2005. DEM based modeling of surface runoff using diffusion wave equation. Journal of Hydrology 302: 107-126.
20. Kim NW, Lee J. 2008. Temporally weighted average curve number method for daily runoff simulation. Hydrological Processes 22(25): 4936-4948.
21. Knisel WG. 1980. CREAMS: a field scale model for chemical, runoff and erosion from agricultural management systems. USDA Conservation Research Report 26: 643.
22. Krysanova V, Wechsung F, Arnold JG. 2000. SWIM User Manual. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research: Potsdam, Germany.
23. Marquardt DW. 1963. An algorithm for least-square estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied mathematics 11: 431-441.
24. McCuen RH. 2003. Modeling Hydrologic Change: Statistical Methods. Lewis Publishers, A CRC Press Company: Boca Raton, FL, ISBN 1-56 670-600-9.
25. Michel C, Vazken A, Perrin C. 2005. Soil conservation service curve number method: how to mend a wrong soil moisture accounting procedure. Water Resources Research 41(W02011): 1-6.
26. Mishra SK, Geetha K, Rastogi AK, Pandey RP. 2005. Long-term hydrologic simulation using storage and source area concepts. Hydrological Processes 19: 2845-2861.
27. Mishra SK, Goel NK, Seth SM, Srivastava DK. 1998. An SCS-CN based long term daily flow simulation model for a hilly catchment. International Symposium of Hydrology of Ungauged Streams in Hilly Regions for Small Hydropower Development, AHEC. University of Roorkee: India; 59-81.
28. Mishra SK, Singh VP. 1999. Another look at the SCS-CN method. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE 4(3): 257-264.
29. Mishra SK, Singh VP. 2002. SCS-CN based hydrologic simulation package. In: Singh VP, Frevert DK (ed.). Mathematical Models in Small Watershed Hydrology and Applications, Ch 10. Water Resources Publication: Littleton, CO; 391-464.
30. Mishra SK, Singh VP. 2003. Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) Methodology. Kluwer: Dordrecht, the Netherlands; ISBN 1-4020-1132-6.
31. Mishra SK, Singh VP. 2004. Long-term hydrological simulation based on the soil conservation service curve number. Hydrological Processes 18: 1291-1313.
32. Motovilov YG, Gottschalk L, Engeland K, Rodhe A. 1999. Validation of distributed hydrological model against spatial observations. Agricultural Forest Meteorology 98: 257-277.
33. Nash JE. 1957. The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph. IASH Pub no. 45, 34, 114-121.
34. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10: 282-290.
35. Pandit A, Gopalakrishnan G. 1996. Estimation of annual storm runoff coefficients by continuous simulation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 122: 211-220.
36. Ponce VM. 1989. Engineering Hydrology: Principles and Practices. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
37. Putty MRY, Prasad R. 1994. Stream flow generation in Western Ghats. 6th National Symposium on Hydrology, Shillong.
38. Putty MRY, Prasad R. 2000. Understanding runoff processes using a watershed model-a case study in the Western Ghats in South India. Journal of Hydrology 228: 215-227.
39. Refsgaard JC, Knudsen J. 1996. Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models. Water Resources Research 32: 2189-2202.
40. Sahu RK, Mishra SK, Eldho TI, Jain MK. 2007. An advanced soil moisture accounting procedure for SCS curve number method. Hydrological Processes-ASCE 21: 2827-2881.
41. Schroeder PR, Dozier TS, Zappi PA, McEnroe BM, Sjostrom JW, Peyton RL. 1994. The Hydrologic Evaluation of Kandfill Performance (HELP) Model: Engineering Documentation for Version 3, EPA/600/R-94/168b, September 1994U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development: Washington, DC.
42. SCS. 1956. Hydrology, National Engineering Handbook, Supplement A, Section 4, Chapter 10, Soil Conservation Service, USDA: Washington, DC.
43. SCS. 1971. Hydrology National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Chapter 10. Soil Conservation Service, USDA: Washington DC.
44. Singh VP. 1992. Elementry Hydrology, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
45. Shirmohammadi A, Yoon KS, Rawls WJ, Smith OH. 1997. Evaluation of curve number procedures to predict runoff in GLEAMS. Journal of American Water Resources Association 33: 1069-1076.
46. Smith RE, Williams JR. 1980. Simulation of surface water hydrology. In CREAMS: A Field Scale Model for Chemicals, Knisel WG (eds), Conservation Research Report No.26. USDA: Washington DC; 643.
47. Williams JR, LaSeur V. 1976. Water yield model using SCS curve numbers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 102: 1241-1253.
48. World Meteorological Organization (WMO). 1975. Intercomparison of conceptual models used in operational hydrological forecasting, WMO Oper. Hydrol. Rep. 7, WMO 429, Geneva.
49. World Meteorological Organization (WMO). 1992. Simulated real-time intercomparison of hydrological models, WMO Oper. Hydrol. Rep. 38, WMO 779, Geneva.
50. USDA. 1990. EPIC-Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator 1. Model Documentation, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Technical Bulletin No. 1768, Washington, DC.
51. Canadian Texture Triangle, [assessed: 20 August 2009].
52. Agro-Climatic Zones, [accessed: 20 August 2009].