Temporal variations of starch and mass in greenhouse tomato leaves under CO2 enrichment

Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 167-177

  Edwards, Diane ^a   Ehret, David ^b   Jolliffe, Peter ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

CO2 enrichment; Dynamics; Leaf mass per area; Leaf starch; Tomato (greenhouse)

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CROP PRODUCTION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FRUIT; LEAF; PHYTOCHEMISTRY; STARCH; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 79551468947     PISSN: 00084220     EISSN: 19181833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4141/CJPS09185     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ammerlaan, A. W. S., Joosten, M. H. A. J. and Grange, R. I. 1986. The starch content of tomato leaves grown under glass. Sci. Hortic. 28:1-9.
2. Ayari, O., Dorais, M. and Gosselin, A. 2000a. Daily variations of photosynthetic efficiency of greenhouse tomato plants during winter and spring. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 125:235-241.
3. Ayari, O., Samson, G., Dorais, M., Boulanger, R. and Gosselin, A. 2000b. Stomatal limitation of photosynthesis in winter production of greenhouse tomato plants. Physiol Plant. 110:558-564. (Pubitemid 32053473)
4. Bertin, N., Tchamitchian, M., Baldet, P., Devaux, C., Brunel, B. and Gary, C. 1999. Contributions of carbohydrate pools to the variations in leaf mass per area within a tomato plant. New Phytol. 143:53-61.
5. 2. Vegetatio 104 /105: 441-448.
6. 2. Bot. Gaz. 148:67-72.
7. Delucia, E. H., Sasek, T. W. and Strain, B. R. 1985. Photosynthetic inhibition after long-term exposure to elevated levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Photosynth. Res. 7:175-184.
8. Edwards, D., Jolliffe, P. and Ehret, D. 2010. Canopy profiles of starch and leaf mass per area in greenhouse tomato and the relationship with leaf area and fruit growth. Sci. Hortic. 125:637-647.
9. 2 enrichment in greenhouse tomato. Ph. D. dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC. pp 275.
10. Edwards, D. R., Jolliffe, P. A. and Ehret, D. L. 2004. Carbon status of CO2-enriched tomato plants under commercial greenhouse conditions. Acta Hortic. (ISHS) 633:279-286.
11. Erhioui, B. M., Gosselin, A., Hao, X., Papadopoulos, A. P. and Dorais, M. 2002. Greenhouse covering materials and supplemental lighting affect growth, yield, photosynthesis and leaf carbohydrate synthesis of tomato plants. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 127:819-824.
12. Galtier, N., Foyer, C. H., Murchie, E., Alred, R., Quick, P., Voelker, T. A., Thepenier, C., Lasceve, G. and Betsche, T. 1995. Effects of light and atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment on photosynthesis and carbon partitioning in the leaves of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentium L.) plants over-expressing sucrose phosphate synthase. J. Exp. Bot. 46:1335-1344.
13. Gary, C., Baldet, P., Bertin, N., Devaux, C., Tchamitchian, M. and Raymond, P. 2003. Time-course of tomato whole-plant respiration and fruit and stem growth during prolonged darkness in relation to carbohydrate reserves. Ann. Bot. 91:429-438.
14. Heuvelink, E. and Dorais, M. 2005. Crop growth and yield. Pages 85-144 in E. Heuvelink, ed. Tomatoes. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, MA.
15. 2 enrichment on the rates of photosynthesis and translocation of tomato leaves. Ann. Appl. Biol. 87:191-200.
16. 2 and temperature on carbohydrate metabolism in marigold (Tagetes Patula). University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
17. 2 enrichment and carbohydrate content on the dark respiration of soybeans. Plant Physiol. 79:684-689.
18. King, A. I., Joyce, D. C. and Reid, M. S. 1988. Role of carbohydrates in diurnal chilling sensitivity of tomato seedlings. Physiol. Plant 86:764-768.
19. Klages, K., Donnison, H., Wunsche, J. and Boldingh, H. 2001. Diurnal changes in non-structural carbohydrates in leaves, phloem exudate and fruit in 'Braeburn' apple. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 28:131-139.
20. 2 responsiveness of plants: a possible link to phloem loading. Plant Cell Environ. 18:959-600.
21. Liu, H.-T. 1990. Physiological limitations to the growth response of bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to carbon dioxide enrichment. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
22. 2 - concentration on the accumulation of starch and sugar in tomato leaves. Physiol. Plant. 21:168-175.
23. Peet, M. M. and Welles, G. 2005. Greenhouse tomato production. Pages 257-304 in E. Heuvelink, ed. Tomatoes. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, MA.
24. Poorter, H., Pepin, S., Rijkers, T., de Jong, Y., Evans, J. R. and Korner, C. 2006. Construction costs, chemical composition and payback time of high-and low-irradiance leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 57:355-371.
25. Portree, J. 1996. Greenhouse vegetable production guide. Extension Systems Branch, BCMAFF, Victoria, BC.
26. Pressman, E., Bar-Tal, A., Shaked, R. and Rosenfeld, K. 1997. The development of tomato root system in relation to the carbohydrate status of the whole plant. Ann. Bot. 80:533-538.
27. SAS Institute, Inc. 2003. Statistical analysis software. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
28. 2 concentration has independent effects on expansion rates and thickness of soybean leaves across light and nitrogen gradients. J. Exp. Bot. 49:583-591.
29. 2 levels and their potential significance for carbon flow in photosynthetic cells. Plant Cell Environ. 14:741-762.
30. 2 I. Sugar and starch concentration. Plant Physiol. 90:1465-1472.