Contribution of carbohydrate pools to the variations in leaf mass per area within a tomato plant

New Phytologist

Volumn 143, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 53-61

  Bertin, N ^a   Tchamitchian, M ^a   Baldet, P ^a   Devaux, C ^a   Brunel, B ^a   Gary, C ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Carbohydrate; Lycopersicon esculentum; SLA; Source:sink ratio; Starch; Tomato

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032790484     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00436.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Acock B, Charles-Edwards DA, Fitter DJ, Hand DW, Ludwig LJ, Warren Wilson J, Withers AC. 1978. The contribution of leaves from different levels within a tomato crop to canopy net photosynthesis: an experimental examination of two canopy models. Journal of Experimental Botany 29: 815-827.
2. Ammerlaan AWS, Joosten MHAJ, Grange RI. 1986. The starch content of tomato leaves grown under glass. Scientia Horticulturae 28: 1-9.
3. Becker RA, Chambers JM, Wilks AR. 1988. The S language. A programming environment for data analysis and graphics. CA, USA: Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software.
4. Bertin N. 1995. Competition for assimilates and fruit position affect fruit set in indeterminate greenhouse tomato. Annals of Botany 75: 55-65.
5. Bertin N, Gary C. 1998. Short and long term fluctuations of the leaf mass per area of tomato plants - implications for growth models. Annals of Botany 82: 71-81.
6. Boehringer-Mannheim. 1979. Méthode enzymatique pour l'analyse Agro-Alimentaire. Meylan, France: Boehringer Mannheim.
7. 14C assimilé chez les Solanacées. Revue Générale de Botanie 75: 579-610.
8. Brouquisse R, James F, Raymond P, Pradet A. 1991. Study of glucose starvation in excised maize root tips. Plant Physiology 96: 619-626.
9. Brunel B, Sarrouy C. 1993. Système automatisé de culture hydroponique en pots dans une serre. Cahier des techniques de l'INRA 32: 19-26.
10. Cao W, Tibbitts TW. 1997. Starch concentration and impact on specific leaf weight and element concentrations in potato leaves under varied carbon dioxide and temperature. Journal of Plant Nutrition 20: 871-881.
11. Chatterton NJ, Lee DR, Hungerford WE. 1972. Diurnal change in specific leaf weight of Medicago sativa L. and Zea mays L. Crop Science 12: 576-578.
12. Czarnowski M, Starzecki W. 1989. The relationship between photosynthesis inhibition and starch accumulation in tomato leaves. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Biological Sciences 37: 7-9.
13. 2 dark fixation. Planta 135: 241-248.
14. 14C-labeled constituents from leaves, bark and wood of cottonwood plants. Physiologia Plant arum 45: 480-488.
15. Dijkstra P. 1989. Cause and effect of differences in specific leaf area. In: Lambers H, Cambridge ML, Konings H, Pons TL, eds. Causes and consequences of variation in growth rate and productivity of higher plants. The Hague, The Netherlands: SPB Academic Publishing, 125-140.
16. Gary C, Bertin N, Tchamitchian M. 1996. 'TOMGRO' modèle explicatif de fonctionnement des cultures sous serre: un outils pour la recherche et pour l'aide à la décision. In: Baille A, ed. Actes du séminaire de l'AIP intersectorielle Serres. Avignon, France: INRA, 90-99.
17. Hammond JBW, Burton K, Shaw AF, Ho LC. 1984. Source-sink relationships and carbon metabolism in tomato leaves. 2. Carbohydrate pools and catabolic enzymes. Annals of Botany 53: 307-314.
18. Heuvelink E. 1996. Tomato growth and yield: quantitative analysis and synthesis. PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.
19. Ho LC, Grange RI, Shaw AF. 1989. Source/sink regulation. In: Baker DA, Milburn J, eds. Transport of photoassimilate. Harlow, UK: Longman, 306-343.
20. 11C in leaflets of the seventh leaf of tomato during leaf expansion. Annals of Botany 41: 833-848.
21. Ho LC, Shaw AF, Hammond JBW, Burton K. 1983. Source-sink relationships and carbon metabolism in tomato leaves. 1. 14C assimilate compartmentation. Annals of Botany 52: 365-372.
22. Holbrook GP, Hansen J, Wallick K, Zinnen T. 1993. Starch accumulation during hydroponic growth of spinach and basil plants under carbon dioxide enrichment. Environmental and Experimental Botany 33: 313-321.
23. Jones JW, Dayan E, Allen LH, Van Keulen H, Challa H. 1991. A dynamic tomato growth and yield model (TOMGRO). Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 34: 663-672.
24. Kunst A, Draeger B, Ziegenhorn J. 1984. Method in enzymatic analysis. Metabolites 1: 163-172.
25. Shaw AF, Grange RI, Ho LC. 1986. The regulation of source leaf assimilate compartmentation. In: Cronshaw J, Lucas WJ, Giaquinta RT, eds. Plant biology Vol. 1, Phloem transport. New York, USA: Alan R. Liss, 391-398.
26. Starck Z, Witek-Czuprynska B. 1991. Modifications of source-sink relationships by prolonged darkness in fruiting tomato plants. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 13: 271-281.
27. Van Keulen H, Penning de Vries FWT, Drees EM. 1982. A summary model for crop growth. In: Penning de Vries FWT, van Laar HH, eds. Simulation of plant growth and crop production. Wageningen, The Netherlands: PUDOC, 87-97.
28. Vignes D. 1972. Variations et déplacement de l'amidon dans la feuille de vigne vierge. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences D 275: 1375-1378.
29. Wilkerson GG, Jones JW, Boote KJ, Mishoe JW. 1983. Modelling soybean growth for crop management. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 26: 63-73.