Violation of syntax and prosody-Disentangling their contributions to the early left anterior negativity (ELAN)

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 490, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 116-120

  Herrmann, Björn ^a   Maess, Burkhard ^a   Friederici, Angela D ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

ELAN; Language; Magnetoencephalography; Prosody; Syntax

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EARLY LEFT ANTERIOR NEGATIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSODY; SPEECH AND LANGUAGE; SYNTAX; TEMPORAL CORTEX;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; LANGUAGE TESTS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TEMPORAL LOBE; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79451474663     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.12.039     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Berti S., Roeber U., Schröger E. Bottom-up influences on working memory: behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength. Experimental Psychology 2004, 51:249-257.
2. Boersma P., Weenink D. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]-Version 5.1.29 2010, pp. 249-257, accessed 10 March 2010. http://www.praat.org/.
3. Eckstein K., Friederici A.D. It's early: event-related potential evidence for initial interaction of syntax and prosody in speech comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:1696-1711.
4. Frazier L., Carlson K., Clifton C. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:244-249.
5. Friederici A.D. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:78-84.
6. Friederici A.D., Hahne A., Mecklinger A. Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1996, 22:1219-1248.
7. Friederici A.D., Pfeifer E., Hahne A. Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research 1993, 1:183-192.
8. Friederici A.D., Wang Y., Herrmann C.S., Maess B., Oertel U. Localization of early syntactic processes in frontal and temporal cortical areas: a magnetoencephalographic study. Human Brain Mapping 2000, 11:1-11.
9. S. Grimm, C. Escera, L. Slabu, J. Costa-Faidella, Electrophysiological evidence for the hierarchical organization of auditory change detection in the human brain, Psychophysiology, in press. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01073.x.
10. Hagoort P., Wassenaar M., Brown C.M. Syntax-related ERP-effects in Dutch. Cognitive Brain Research 2003, 16:38-50.
11. Hahne A., Friederici A.D. Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11:194-205.
12. Hahne A., Schröger E., Friederici A.D. Segregating early physical and syntactic processes in auditory sentence comprehension. Neuroreport 2002, 13:305-309.
13. Herrmann B., Maess B., Hasting A.S., Friederici A.D. Localization of the syntactic mismatch negativity in the temporal cortex: an MEG study. Neuroimage 2009, 48:590-600.
14. Herrmann C.S., Oertel U., Wang Y., Maess B., Friederici A.D. Noise affects auditory and linguistic processing differently: an MEG study. Neuroreport 2000, 11:227-229.
15. Knösche T.R., Maess B., Friederici A.D. Processing of syntactic information monitored by brain surface current density mapping based on MEG. Brain Topography 1999, 12:75-87.
16. Kubota M., Ferrari P., Roberts T.P.L. Human neuronal encoding of English syntactic violations as revealed by both L1 and L2 speakers. Neuroscience Letters 2004, 368:235-240.
17. Mattout J., Henson R.N., Friston K.J. Canonical source reconstruction for MEG. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2007, Article ID67613.
18. Meyer M., Alter K., Friederici A.D., Lohmann G., von Cramon D.Y. FMRI reveals brain regions mediating slow prosodic modulations in spoken sentences. Human Brain Mapping 2002, 17:73-88.
19. Mietz A., Toepel U., Ischebeck A., Alter K. Inadequate and infrequent are not alike: ERPs to deviant prosodic patterns in spoken sentence comprehension. Brain and Language 2008, 104:159-169.
20. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
21. Pascual-Marqui R.D. Standardized low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORTEA): technical details. Methods & Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology 2002, 24:5-12.
22. Pakarinen S., Takegata R., Rinne T., Huotilainen M., Näätänen R. Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP). Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118:177-185.
23. Pulvermüller F. Brain embodiment of syntax and grammar: discrete combinatorial mechanisms spelt out in neuronal circuits. Brain & Language 2010, 112:167-179.
24. Sabisch B., Hahne A., Glass E., von Suchodoletz W., Friederici A.D. Children with specific language impairment: the role of prosodic processes in explaining difficulties in processing syntactic information. Brain Research 2009, 1261:37-44.
25. Schön D., Magne C., Besson M. The music of speech: music training facilitates pitch processing in both music and language. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:341-349.
26. Slabu L., Escera C., Grimm S., Costa-Faidella J. Early change detection in humans as revealed by auditory brainstem and middle-latency evoked potentials. European Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 32:859-865.
27. Taulu S., Kajola M., Simola J. Suppression of interference and artifacts by the signal space separation method. Brain Topography 2004, 16:269-275.