Efficient large-array k-domain parallel MRI using channel-by-channel array reduction

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 209-215

  Feng, Shuo ^a   Zhu, Yudong ^b   Ji, Jim ^a  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Channel reduction; GRAPPA; Large arrays; MCMLI; Parallel imaging

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ALGORITHMS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 79451472530     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. McDougall M., Wright S. 64-channel array coil for single echo acquisition magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005, 54(2):386-392.
2. Lee R.F. A 128-channel helium-3 phased array at 3t for highly accelerated parallel imaging in hyperpolarized gas MRI 2008.
3. Hardy C., et al. 128-channel body MRI with a flexible high-density receiver-coil array. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 28:1219-1225.
4. Wright S.M. 2007.
5. Pruessmann K., et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999, 42(5):952-962.
6. Bosshard J.C., et al. High speed MR elastography using SEA imaging 2008.
7. Heidemann R., et al. VD-auto-SMASH imaging. Magn Reson Med 2001, 45(6):1066-1074.
8. Griswold M., et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002, 47(6):1202-1210.
9. Doneva M., Börnert P. Automatic coil selection for channel reduction in SENSE-based parallel imaging. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med 2008, 21(3):187-196.
10. Buehrer M., et al. Array compression for MRI with large coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 2007, 57(6):1131-1139.
11. Huang F., et al. A software channel compression technique for faster reconstruction with many channels. Magn Reson Imag 2008, 133.
12. Qu P., et al. Tailored utilization of acquired k-space points for GRAPPA reconstruction. J Magn Reson 2005, 174(1):60-67.
13. Son J., et al. Adaptive SENSE reconstruction for parallel imaging with massive array coils 2004.
14. Ji J.X., Feng S. Efficient large-array k-domain parallel MRI using channel-by-channel array reduction 2009.
15. Heberlein K. Automated coil subset selection for improved GRAPPA reconstruction 2009.
16. Samsonov A. On optimality of parallel MRI reconstruction in k-space. Magn Reson Med 2008, 59(1):156-164.
17. Feng S., Ji J. Channel reduction in massive array parallel MRI 2009.
18. Wang Z., Wang J., Detre J. Improved data reconstruction method for GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med 2005, 54(3):738-742.
19. Gonzalez R., Woods R.E. Digital Image Processing 2002, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 2nd International ed.
20. Ji J.X., Son J.B., Rane S. PULSAR: A MATLAB toolbox for parallel magnetic resonance imaging using array coils and multiple channel receivers. Concepts Magn Reson Part B: Mag Reson Engr 2007, 31B:24-36.