Identification of TATA and TATA-less promoters in plant genomes by integrating diversity measure, GC-Skew and DNA geometric flexibility

Genomics

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 112-120

  Zuo, Yong Chun ^a   Li, Qian Zhong ^a  

^a INNER MONGOLIA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Correlative conservation; DNA structural pattern; GC compositional bias; Plant promoter; Support vector machine

Indexed keywords

TATA BINDING PROTEIN;

5' UNTRANSLATED REGION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT GENOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN MOTIF; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ARABIDOPSIS; BASE COMPOSITION; BASE SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATA MINING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENOME, PLANT; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 79451472198     PISSN: 08887543     EISSN: 10898646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Gordon J.J., Towsey M.W., Hogan J.M., Mathews S.A., Timms P. Improved prediction of bacterial transcription start sites. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:142-148.
2. Towsey M.W., Gordon J.J., Hogan J.M. The prediction of bacterial transcription start sites using support vector machines. Int. J. Neural Syst. 2006, 16:363-370.
3. Wang H., Benham C.J. Promoter prediction and annotation of microbial genomes based on DNA sequence and structural responses to superhelical stress. BMC Bioinform. 2006, 7:248.
4. Zhao X.Y., Xuan Z.Y., Zhang M.Q. Boosting with stumps for predicting transcription start sites. Genome Biol. 2007, 8:R17.
5. Knudsen S. Promoter 2.0: for the recognition of Pol II promoter sequences. Bioinformatics 1999, 15:356-361.
6. Burden S., Lin Y.X., Zhang R. Improving promoter prediction for the NNPP2.2 algorithm: a case study using Escherichia coli DNA sequences. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:601-607.
7. Gershenzon N.I., Ioshikhes I.P. Synergy of human Pol II core promoter elements revealed by statistical sequence analysis. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:1295-1300.
8. Ohler U., Liao G.C., Niemann H., Rubin G.M. Computational analysis of core promoters in the Drosophila genome. Genome Biol. 2002, 3:12.
9. Yang C., Bolotin E., Jiang T., Sladek F.M., Martinez E. Prevalence of the initiator over the TATA box in human and yeast genes and identification of DNA motifs enriched in human TATA-less core promoters. Gene 2007, 389:52-65.
10. Zhang M.Q. Identification of human gene core promoters in silico. Genome Res. 1998, 8:319-326.
11. Scherf M., Klingenhoff A., Werner T. Highly specific localization of promoter regions in large genomic sequences by PromoterInspector: a novel context analysis approach. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 297:599-606.
12. Bajic V.B., et al. Dragon Promoter Finder: recognition of vertebrate RNA polymerase II promoters. Bioinformatics 2002, 18:198-199.
13. Narang V., Sung W.K., Mittal A. Computational modeling of oligonucleotide positional densities for human promoter prediction. Artif. Intell. Med. 2005, 35:107-119.
14. Xie X.D., Wu S.H., Lam K.M., Yan H. PromoterExplorer: an effective promoter identification method based on the AdaBoost algorithm. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2722-2728.
15. Wu S.H., Xie X.D., Liew A.W., Yan H. Eukaryotic promoter prediction based on relative entropy and positional information. Phys. Rev. E 2007, 75:041908.
16. Jin H.Y., Luo L.F., Zhang L.R. Using estimative reaction free energy to predict splice sites and their flanking competitors. Gene 2008, 424:115-120.
17. Akan P., Deloukas P. DNA sequence and structural properties as predictors of human and mouse promoters. Gene 2008, 410:165-176.
18. Abeel T., Saeys Y., Bonnet E., Rouzé P., Van de Peer Y. Generic eukaryotic core promoter prediction using structural features of DNA. Genome Res. 2008, 18:310-323.
19. Brick K., Watanabe J., Pizzi E. Core promoters are predicted by their distinct physicochemical properties in the genome of Plasmodium falciparum. Genome Biol. 2008, 9:R178.
20. Florquin K., Saeys Y., Degroeve S., Rouzé P., Van de Peer Y. Large-scale structural analysis of the core promoter in mammalian and plant genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33:4255-4264.
21. Uren P.J., Cameron-Jones M., Sale A.H.J. Promoter prediction using physico-chemical properties of DNA. Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics (4216) 2006, 21-31. Springer-Verlag: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin; New York. Computational Life Sciences II (Ed.).
22. Rombauts S., et al. Computational approaches to identify promoters and cis-regulatory elements in plant genomes. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132:1162-1176.
23. Van de Peer Y. The future for plants and plants for the future. Genome Biol. 2007, 8:308.
24. Shahmuradov I.A., Solovyev V.V., Gammerman A.J. Plant promoter prediction with confidence estimation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33:1069-1076.
25. Pandey S.P., Krishnamachari A. Computational analysis of plant RNA Pol-II promoters. BioSystems 2006, 83:38-50.
26. Yamamoto Y.Y., et al. Differentiation of core promoter architecture between plants and mammals revealed by LDSS analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35:6219-6226.
27. Yamamoto Y.Y., et al. Identification of plant promoter constituents by analysis of local distribution of short sequences. BMC Genomics 2007, 8:67.
28. Olson W.K., Gorin A.A., Lu X.J., Hock L.M., Zhurkin V.B. DNA sequence-dependent deformability deduced from protein-DNA crystal complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 1998, 95:11163-11168.
29. Goñi J., Pérez A., Torrents D., Orozco M. Determining promoter location based on DNA structure first-principles calculations. Genome Biol. 2007, 8:R263.
30. Morozov A.V., et al. Using DNA mechanics to predict in vitro nucleosome positions and formation energies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:4707-4722.
31. Li Q.Z., Lin H. The recognition and prediction of sigma70 promoters in Escherichia coli K-12. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 242:135-141.
32. Ponjavic J., et al. Transcriptional and structural impact of TATA-initiation site spacing in mammalian core promoters. Genome Biol. 2006, 7:R78.
33. Molina C., Grotewold E. Genome wide analysis of Arabidopsis core promoters. BMC Genomics 2005, 6:25.
34. Lichtenberg J., et al. The word landscape of the non-coding segments of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:463.
35. Bernard V., Brunaud V., Lecharny A. TC-motifs at the TATA-box expected position in plant genes: a novel class of motifs involved in the transcription regulation. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:166.
36. Tatarinova T., Brover V., Troukhan M., Alexandrov N. Skew in CG content near the transcription start site in Arabidopsis thaliana. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:i313-:i314.
37. Berezhnoy A., Shckorbatov Y. Dependence of the E. coli promoter strength and physical parameters upon the nucleotide sequence. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. 6B 2005, 11:1063-1068.
38. Swarbreck D., Wilks C., Lamesch P., Berardini T.Z., Garcia-Hernandez M., Foerster H., Li D., Meyer T., Muller R., Ploetz L., Radenbaugh A., Singh S., Swing V., Tissier C., Zhang P., Huala E. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): gene structure and function annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:D1009-D1014.
39. Abeel T., Saeys Y., Rouzé P., Van de Peer Y. ProSOM: core promoter prediction based on unsupervised clustering of DNA physical profiles. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:i24-i31.
40. Bell-Lelong D.A., Cusumano J.C., Meyer K., Chapple C. Cinnamate-4-hydroxylase expression in Arabidopsis. Regulation in response to development and the environment. Plant Physiol. 1997, 113:729-738.
41. Zhang M.Q. Computational analyses of eukaryotic promoters. BMC Bioinform. 2007, 8:S3.
42. Shahmuradov I.A., Gammerman A.J., Hancock J.M., Bramley P.M., Solovyev V.V. PlantProm: a database of plant promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31:114-117.
43. Laxton R.R. The measure of diversity. J. Theor. Biol. 1978, 71:51-67.
44. Lin H., Li Q.Z. Using pseudo amino acid composition to predict protein structural class: approached by incorporating 400 dipeptide components. J. Comput. Chem. 2007, 28:1463-1466.
45. Li Q.Z., Lu Z.Q. The prediction of the structural class of protein: application of the measure of diversity. J. Theor. Biol. 2001, 213:493-502.
46. Zhang L.R., Luo L.F. Splice site prediction with quadratic discriminant analysis using diversity measure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31:6214-6220.
47. Chen Y.L., Li Q.Z. Prediction of the subcellular location of apoptosis proteins. J. Theor. Biol. 2007, 245:775-783.
48. Bucher P. Weight matrix descriptions of four eukaryotic RNA polymerase II promoter elements derived from 502 unrelated promoters. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 212:563-578.
49. Claverie J.M., Audic S. The statistical significance of nucleotide position-weight matrix matches. CABIOS 1996, 12:431-439.
50. Fickett J.W. Quantitative discrimination of MEF2 sites. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996, 16:437-441.
51. Zuo Y.C., Li Q.Z. Analysis of plant TATA and TATA-less promoters by using sequence and structure features. Prog. Biochem. Biophys. 2009, 36:863-871.
52. Fujimori S., Washio T., Tomita M. GC-compositional strand bias around transcription start sites in plants and fungi. BMC Genomics 2005, 6:26.
53. Pu X., Guo J., Leunga H., Lin Y.L. Prediction of membrane protein types from sequences and position-specific scoring matrices. J. Theor. Biol. 2007, 247:259-265.
54. Zhang G.Q., Cao Z.W., Luo Q.M., Cai Y.D., Li Y.X. Operon prediction based on SVM. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2006, 30:233-240.
55. Sonnenburg S., Zien A., Rätsch G. ARTS: accurate recognition of transcription starts in human. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:e472-e480.
56. Chang C.C., Lin C.J. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines Software available at. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm.