Effect of three direct restorative materials on molar cuspal fracture resistance

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 228-232

  Allara Jr , Frank W ^a   Diefenderfer, Kim E ^b   Molinaro, Joseph D ^c  

^a Geilenkirchen NATO Air Base   (Germany)

^b Naval Institute for Dental and Biomedical Research   (United States)

^c Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MOLAR, THIRD; PILOT PROJECTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 7944236867     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Braly BV, Maxwell EH. Potential for tooth fracture in restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 45:411-414.
2. Larson TD, Douglas WH, Geistfeld RE. Effect of prepared cavities on the strength of teeth. Oper Dent 1981; 6:2-5.
3. Eakle WS. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with class II bonded composite resin. J Dent Res 1986; 65:149-153.
4. Stampalia LL, Nicholls JI, Brudvik JS, Jones DW. Fracture resistance of teeth with resin-bonded restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55:694-698.
5. Joynt RB, Wieczkowski G, Klockowski R, Davis EL. Effects of composite restorations on resistance to cuspal fracture in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57:431-435.
6. Blaser RK, Lund MR, Cochran MA, Potter RH. Effects of designs of Class 2 preparations on resistance of teeth to fracture. Oper Dent 1983; 8:6-10.
7. Eakle WS, Maxwell EH & Braly BV. Fractures of posterior teeth in adults. J Am Dent Assoc 1985; 112:215-218.
8. Lagouvardos P, Sourai P, Douvitsas G. Coronal fractures in posterior teeth. Oper Dent 1989; 14:28-32.
9. Panitvisai P, Messer H. Cuspal deflection in molars in relation to endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1995; 21:57-61.
10. Caron GA, Murchison DF, Cohen RB, Broome JC. Resistance to fracture of teeth with various preparations for amalgam. J Dent 1996; 24:407-410.
11. McDaniel RJ, Davis RD, Murchison DF, Cohen RB. Causes of failure among cuspal-coverage amalgam restorations: A clinical survey. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131:173-177.
12. Jagadish S, Yogesh BG. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite and glass cermet restorations. Oper Dent 1990; 15:42-47.
13. Gelb MN, Barouch E, Simonsen RJ. Resistance to cusp fracture in Class II prepared and restored premolars. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55:184-185.
14. Berman RL, Ben-Amar A, Gontar G, Hirsh A. The effect of posterior composite restorations on the resistance of cavity walls to vertically applied occlusal loads. J Oral Rehab 1990; 17:99-105.
15. Sheth JJ, Fuller JL, Jensen ME. Cuspal deformation and fracture resistance of teeth with dentin adhesives and composites. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60:560-569.
16. Boyer DB, Roth L. Fracture resistance of teeth with bonded amalgams. Am J Dent 1994; 7:91-94.
17. Eakle WS, Staninec M, Lacy AM. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68:257-260.
18. Santos AC, Meiers JC. Fracture resistance of premolars with MOD amalgam restorations lined with Amalgambond. Oper Dent 1994; 19:2-6.
19. Oliveira JP, Cochran MA, Moore BK. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth. Oper Dent 1996; 21:110-115.
20. Bonilla E, White SN. Fatigue of resin-bonded amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1996; 21:122-126.
21. Lindemuth JS, Hagge MS, Broome JS. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations Oper Dent 2000; 25:177-181.
22. Molinaro JD, Diefenderfer KE, Strother JM. Influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite, and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness. Oper Dent 2002; 27:516-524.
23. Phillips RW, Avery AR, Mehra R, Swartz ML, McCune RJ. One-year observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 26:68-77.
24. Phillips RW, Avery AR, Mehra R, Swartz ML, McCune RJ. Observations on a composite resin for class II restorations: Two-year report. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 28:164-169.
25. Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Cox CF. Evaluating the antagonistic wear of restorative materials when placed against human enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127:74-80.
26. Mazer RB, Leinfelder KF, Russell CM. Degradation of microfilled posterior composite. Dent Mater 1992; 8:185-189.
27. Leinfelder KF, Sluder, TB, Sockwell CL, Strickland WD, Wall JT. Clinical evaluation of composite resins as anterior and posterior restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1975; 33:407-416.
28. Leinfelder KF, Roberson TM. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite resins. Gen Dent 1983; 31:276-280.
29. Leinfelder KF. Evaluation of criteria used for assessing the clinical performance of composite resins in posterior teeth. Quintessence Int 1987; 18:531-536.
30. Osborne JW, Gale EN, Ferguson GW. One-year and two-year clinical evaluation of a composite resin vs. amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 30: 795-800.
31. Leinfelder KF, Sluder TB, Fortunato J, Santos F, Wall JT. Five-year clinical evaluation of anterior and posterior restorations of composite resin. Oper Dent 1980; 5:57-65.
32. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF. Localized wear and marginal integrity of posterior resin composites. Am J Dent 1993; 6:199-203.
33. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y. Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites. Am J Dent 1995; 8:173-178.
34. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 1997; 76:1405-1411.
35. Söderhölm KJM, Richards ND. Wear resistance of composites: A solved problem? Gen Dent 1998; 46:256-263.
36. Roberts MW, Folio J, Moffa J, Guckes A. Clinical evaluation of a composite resin system with a dentin bonding agent for restoration of permanent posterior teeth: A 3-year study. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67:301-306.
37. Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC, Swift EJ. Packable composites: Overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11:234-249.
38. Jackson RD, Morgan M. The new posterior resins and a simplified placement technique. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131:375-383.
39. Nash RW, Radz GM. A report on a new condensable composite resin. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19:230-237.
40. Medige J, Deng Y, Yu X, Davis EL, Joynt RB. Effect of restorative materials on cuspal flexure. Quintessence Int 1995; 26:571-576.
41. Mondelli RF, Barbosa WF, Mondelli J, Franco EB, Carvalho RM. Fracture strength of weakened human premolars restored with amalgam with and without cusp coverage. Am J Dent 1998; 11:181-184.
42. Uyehara MY, Davis RD, Overton JD. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars. Oper Dent 1999; 24:364-370.
43. Segura A, Riggins R. Fracture resistance of four different restorations for cuspal replacement. J Oral Rehab 1999; 26:928-931.
44. Pilo R, Brosh, T, Chweidan H. Cusp reinforcement by bonding of amalgam restorations. J Dent 1998; 26:467-472.
45. el-Badrawy WA. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam. Oper Dent 1999; 24:337-343.
46. Dias de Souza GM, Pereira GDS, Dias CTS, Paulillo LAMS. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with the bonded amalgam technique. Oper Dent 2001; 26:511-515.
47. Lopes LMP, Leitao JGM, Douglas WH. Effect of a new resin inlay/onlay restorative material on cuspal reinforcement. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:641-645.
48. Linn J, Messer HH. Effect of restorative procedures on the strength of endodontically treated molars. J Endod 1994; 20:479-485.
49. Costa LC, Pegoraro LF, Bonfante G. Influence of different metal restorations bonded with resin on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77:365-369.
50. Geurtsen W, Garcia-Godoy F. Bonded restorations for the prevention and treatment of the cracked tooth syndrome. Am J Dent 1999; 12:266-270.
51. nd ed. Chicago Quintessence Publishing Company, 2001; 26-55.
52. Asmussen E. Restorative resins: Hardness and strength versus quantity of remaining double bonds. Scand J Dental Res 1982; 90:484-489.
53. Caughman WF, Caughman GB, Shiflett RA, Rueggeberg F, Schuster GS. Correlation of cytotoxicity, filler loading and curing time of dental composites. Biomat 1991; 12:737-740.
54. Choi KK, Ferracane JL, Hilton TJ, Charlton D. Properties of packable dental composites. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12:216-226.
55. Cobb DS, MacGregor KM, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. The physical properties of packable and conventional resin-based composites: A comparison. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131:1610-1615.
56. Yap AUJ. Effectiveness of polymerization in composite restoratives claiming bulk placement: Impact of cavity depth and exposure time. Oper Dent 2000; 25:113-120.