Limitations of codon adaptation index and other coding DNA-based features for prediction of protein expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Yeast

Volumn 21, Issue 13, 2004, Pages 1083-1093

  Friberg, Markus ^a   von Rohr, Peter ^a   Gonnet, Gaston ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Codon adaptation index; Codon frequencies; Protein expression; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL DNA; MESSENGER RNA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CODON USAGE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FUNGAL GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; CODON; DNA, FUNGAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENES, FUNGAL; MODELS, GENETIC; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RNA, FUNGAL; RNA, MESSENGER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 7944235765     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.1150     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bennetzen JL, Hall BD. 1982. Codon selection in yeast. J Biol Chem 257: 3026-3031.
2. Boycheva S, Chkodrov G, Ivanov I. 2003. Codon pairs in the genome of Escherichia coli. Bioinformatics 19: 987-998.
3. Bulmer M. 1990. The effect of context on synonymous codon usage in genes with low codon usage bias. Nucleic Acids Res 18 2869-2873.
4. Carbone A, Zinovyev A, Kepes F. 2003. Codon adaptation index as a measure of dominating codon bias. Bioinformatics 19: 2005-2015.
5. Coghlan A, Wolfe KH. 2000. Relationship of codon bias to mRNA concentration and protein length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 16: 1131-1145.
6. Ghaemmaghami S, Huh WK, Bower K, et al. 2003. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425: 737-741.
7. Gouy M. 1987. Codon contexts in enterobacterial and coliphage genes. Mol Biol Evol 4: 426-444.
8. Greenbaum D, Jansen R, Gerstein M. 2002. Analysis of mRNA expression and protein abundance data: an approach for the comparison of the enrichment of features in the cellular population of proteins and transcripts. Bioinformatics 18: 585-596.
9. Gutman GA, Hatfield GW. 1989. Non-random utilization of codon pairs in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 3699-3703.
10. Holstege FC, Jennings EG, Wyrick JJ, et al. 1998. Dissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryotic genome. Cell 95: 717-728.
11. Ikemura T. 1985. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol 2: 13-34.
12. Jansen R, Bussemaker HJ, Gerstein M. 2003. Revisiting the codon adaptation index from a whole-genome perspective: analyzing the relationship between gene expression and codon occurrence in yeast using a variety of models. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 2242-2251.
13. Jelinsky SA, Samson LD. 1999. Global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an alkylating agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 1486-1491.
14. Kliman RM, Irving N, Santiago M. 2003. Selection conflicts, gene expression, and codon usage trends in yeast. J Mol Evol 57 98-109.
15. Robinson M, Lilley R, Little S, et al. 1984. Codon usage can affect efficiency of translation of genes in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 12: 6663-6671.
16. Roth FP, Hughes JD, Estep PW, Church GM. 1998. Finding DNA regulatory motifs within unaligned noncoding sequences clustered by whole-genome mRNA quantitation. Nature Biotechnol 16: 939-945.
17. Sharp PM, Li WH. 1987. The codon adaptation index - a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res 15: 1281-1295.
18. Velculescu VE, Zhang L, Zhou W, et al. 1997. Characterization of the yeast transcriptome. Cell 88: 243-251.
19. Wright F. 1990. The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. Gene 87: 23-29.