-
1
-
-
0004267366
-
Vaginal delivery after cesarean section
-
Riva HL, Teich JC. Vaginal delivery after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961;81:501-10.
-
(1961)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.81
, pp. 501-510
-
-
Riva, H.L.1
Teich, J.C.2
-
2
-
-
0026621465
-
Morbidity of failed labor in patients with prior cesarean section
-
Stone J, Lockwood CJ, Berkowitz GS, Lynch L, Alvarez M, Lapinski RH, Berkowite RL. Morbidity of failed labor in patients with prior cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:1513-7.
-
(1992)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.167
, pp. 1513-1517
-
-
Stone, J.1
Lockwood, C.J.2
Berkowitz, G.S.3
Lynch, L.4
Alvarez, M.5
Lapinski, R.H.6
Berkowite, R.L.7
-
5
-
-
0035092047
-
Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC)
-
Flamm BL. Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC). Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;15:81-92.
-
(2001)
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
, vol.15
, pp. 81-92
-
-
Flamm, B.L.1
-
7
-
-
0035811679
-
Vaginal delivery after cesarean section: Is the risk acceptable?
-
Greene MF. Vaginal delivery after cesarean section: is the risk acceptable? N Engl J Med 2001;345:54-5.
-
(2001)
N Engl J Med
, vol.345
, pp. 54-55
-
-
Greene, M.F.1
-
8
-
-
85047692196
-
Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: A systematic review
-
Guise JM, Berlin M, McDonagh M, Osterweil P, Chan B, Helfan M. Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:420-9.
-
(2004)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.103
, pp. 420-429
-
-
Guise, J.M.1
Berlin, M.2
McDonagh, M.3
Osterweil, P.4
Chan, B.5
Helfan, M.6
-
9
-
-
3242739298
-
Vaginal birth after previous cesarean
-
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 54. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
-
Vaginal birth after previous cesarean. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 54. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:203-12.
-
(2004)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.104
, pp. 203-212
-
-
-
11
-
-
0013188469
-
Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A group practice's approach to minimizing failed trial of labor
-
Stedman CM, Scudder SR, Joseph GF. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a group practice's approach to minimizing failed trial of labor. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns 1998;5:187-8.
-
(1998)
Prim Care Update Ob Gyns
, vol.5
, pp. 187-188
-
-
Stedman, C.M.1
Scudder, S.R.2
Joseph, G.F.3
-
12
-
-
77950409212
-
VBAC: Is it worth the risk?
-
Simpson L. VBAC: is it worth the risk? Contemporary Ob Gyn 2003;48:27-34.
-
(2003)
Contemporary Ob Gyn
, vol.48
, pp. 27-34
-
-
Simpson, L.1
-
13
-
-
0036145546
-
Interdelivery interval and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery
-
Huang WH, Nakashima DK, Rumney PJ, Keegan KA, Chan K. Interdelivery interval and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99: 41-4.
-
(2002)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.99
, pp. 41-44
-
-
Huang, W.H.1
Nakashima, D.K.2
Rumney, P.J.3
Keegan, K.A.4
Chan, K.5
-
15
-
-
0036085037
-
The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture
-
Bujold E, Bujold C, Hamilton EF, Hard F, Gauthier RJ. The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:1326-30.
-
(2002)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.186
, pp. 1326-1330
-
-
Bujold, E.1
Bujold, C.2
Hamilton, E.F.3
Hard, F.4
Gauthier, R.J.5
-
16
-
-
0242509147
-
Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single-layer and double-layer closure at cesarean delivery
-
Durnwald C, Mercer B. Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single-layer and double-layer closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:925-9.
-
(2003)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.189
, pp. 925-929
-
-
Durnwald, C.1
Mercer, B.2
-
17
-
-
0037343069
-
The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates
-
Elkousky MA, Sammel M, Stevens E, Peipert JF, Macones G. The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188: 824-30.
-
(2003)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.188
, pp. 824-830
-
-
Elkousky, M.A.1
Sammel, M.2
Stevens, E.3
Peipert, J.F.4
Macones, G.5
|