메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 48, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 27-34

VBAC: Is it worth the risk?: No. Patients should have the option of elective repeat C/S

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 77950409212     PISSN: 00903159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (1)

References (12)
  • 5
    • 0025959337 scopus 로고
    • Vaginal birth after cesarean: A meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality
    • Rosen MG. Dickinson JC, Westhoff CL. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:465-470.
    • (1991) Obstet Gynecol , vol.7 , pp. 465-470
    • Rosen, M.G.1    Dickinson, J.C.2    Westhoff, C.L.3
  • 6
    • 0025832652 scopus 로고
    • Mandatory trial of labor after cesarean delivery: An alternative viewpoint
    • Scott JR. Mandatory trial of labor after cesarean delivery: an alternative viewpoint. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:811-814.
    • (1991) Obstet Gynecol , vol.7 , pp. 811-814
    • Scott, J.R.1
  • 7
    • 0026058607 scopus 로고
    • Uterine rupture during trial of labor after previous cesarean section
    • Farmer RM, Kirschbaum T, Potter D. et al. Uterine rupture during trial of labor after previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:996-1001.
    • (1991) Am J Obstet Gynecol , vol.16 , pp. 996-1001
    • Farmer, R.M.1    Kirschbaum, T.2    Potter, D.3
  • 8
    • 0029822091 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section
    • McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA Jr, et al. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996:335:689-695.
    • (1996) N Engl J Med , vol.33 , pp. 689-695
    • McMahon, M.J.1    Luther, E.R.2    Bowes Jr., W.A.3
  • 9
    • 0033676314 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999
    • Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1187-1197.
    • (2000) Am J Obstet Gynecol , vol.18 , pp. 1187-1197
    • Mozurkewich, E.L.1    Hutton, E.K.2
  • 10
    • 0037157175 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies
    • Smith GC. Pell JP, Cameron AD, et al. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. JAMA. 2002;287:2684-2690.
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.28 , pp. 2684-2690
    • Smith, G.C.1    Pell, J.P.2    Cameron, A.D.3
  • 11
    • 0034081035 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Socol ML Cost-effectiveness of elective cesarean delivery after one prior low transverse cesarean
    • Grobman WA. Peaceman AM, Socol ML Cost-effectiveness of elective cesarean delivery after one prior low transverse cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2000, 95:745-751.
    • (2000) Obstet Gynecol , vol.9 , pp. 745-751
    • Grobman, W.A.1    Peaceman, A.M.2
  • 12
    • 0034036710 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is vaginal birth after cesarean less expensive than repeat cesarean de Hvery?
    • Clark SL, Scott JR, Porter TF. et al. Is vaginal birth after cesarean less expensive than repeat cesarean de Hvery? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:599-602.
    • (2000) Am J Obstet Gynecol , vol.182 , pp. 599-602
    • Clark, S.L.1    Scott, J.R.2    Porter, T.F.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.