Starting-condition dependence of order parameters derived from molecular dynamics simulations

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Volumn 6, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 2176-2190

  Genheden, Samuel ^a   Diehl, Carl ^b   Akke, Mikael ^b   Ryde, Ulf ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79251636508     PISSN: 15499618     EISSN: 15499626     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ct900696z     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. 9k. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 115, 9832-9833.
2. Homans, S. W. Probing the binding entropy of ligand-protein interactions by NMR. ChemBioChem 2005, 6, 1585-1591.
3. Igumenova, T. I.; Frederick, K. K.; Wand, A. J. Characterization of the fast dynamics of protein amino acid side chains using NMR relaxation in solution. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 1672-1699.
4. Lipari, G.; Szabo, A. Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 4546-4559.
5. Clore, G. M.; Szabo, A.; Bax, A.; Kay, L. E.; Driscoll, P. C.; Gronenborn, A. M. Deviations from the simple two-parameter model-free approach to the interpretation of 15N nuclear magnetic relaxation of proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4989-4991.
6. Halle, B. The physical basis of model-free analysis of NMR relaxation data from proteins and complex fluids. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 224507.
7. Palmer, A. G. NMR probes of molecular dynamics: overview and comparison with other techniques. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2001, 30, 129-155.
8. Boyd, J. Measurement of 15N Relaxation Data from the Side Chains of Asparagine and Glutamine Residues in Proteins. J. Magn. Reson. B 1995, 107, 279-285.
9. Berglund, H.; Baumann, H.; Knapp, S.; Ladenstein, R.; Härd, T. Flexibility of an Arginine Side Chain at a DNA-Protein Interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12883-12884.
10. Muhandiram, D. R.; Yamazaki, T.; Sykes, B. D.; Kay, L. E. Measurement of 2H T1 and T1.rho. Relaxation Times in Uniformly 13C-Labeled and Fractionally 2H-Labeled Proteins in Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11536-11544.
11. Millet, O.; Muhandiram, D. R.; Skrynnikov, N. R.; Kay, L. E. Deuterium Spin Probes of Side-Chain Dynamics in Proteins. 1. Measurement of Five Relaxation Rates per Deuteron in 13C-Labeled and Fractionally 2H-Enriched Proteins in Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6439-6448.
12. Li, D.-W.; Brüschweiler, R. A Dictionary for Protein Side- Chain Entropies from NMR Order Parameters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7226-7227.
13. Case, D. A. Molecular Dynamics and NMR Spin Relaxation in Proteins. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 325-331.
14. Brüschweiler, R. New approaches to the dynamic interpretation and prediction of NMR relaxation data from proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2003, 13, 175-183.
15. Philippopoulos, M.; Mandel, A. M.; Palmer, A. G.; Lim, C. Structure and dynamics of the M13 coat signal sequence in membranes by multidimensional high-resolution and solidstate NMR spectroscopy. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Gen. 1997, 27, 481-493.
16. Showalter, S. A.; Brüschweiler, R. Validation of molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules using NMR spin relaxation as benchmarks: Application to the AMBER99SB force field. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2007, 3, 961-975.
17. Hornak, V.; Abel, R.; Okur, A.; Strockbine, B.; Roitberg, A.; Simmerling, C. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins: Struct., Funct. Bioinform. 2006, 65, 712-725.
18. Buck, M. S.; Bouguet-Bonnet, S.; Pastor, R. W.; MacKerell, A. D. Importance of the CMAP correction to the CHARMM22 protein force field: dynamics of hen lysozyme. Biophys. J. Biophys. Lett. 2006, 90, L36-L38.
19. Soares, T.; Daura, X.; Oostenbrink, C.; Smith, L.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Validation of the GROMOS force-field parameter set 45A3 against nuclear magnetic resonance data of hen egg lysozyme. J. Biomol. NMR 2004, 30, 407-422.
20. Lipari, G. A. Szabo. Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 4546-4559.
21. Horita, D. A.; Zhang, W.; Smithgall, T. E.; Gmeiner, W. H.; Byrd, R. A. Dynamics of the Hck-SH3 domain: comparison of experiment with multiple molecular dynamics simulations. Protein Sci. 2000, 9, 95-103.
22. Andrews, B. K.; Romo, T.; Clarage, J. B.; Pettitt, B. M.; Phillips, G. N. Characterizing global substates of myoglobin. Structure. 1998, 6, 587-594.
23. Koller, A. N.; Schwalbe, H.; Gohlke, H. Starting Structure Dependence of NMR Order Parameters Derived from MD Simulations: Implications for Judging Force-Field Quality. Biophys. J. Biophys. Lett. 2008, 95, L04-L06.
24. Smith, P. E.; Petitt, B. M.; Karplus, M. Stochastic dynamics simulations of the alanine dipeptide using a solvent-modified potential energy surface. J. Phys. Chem. 1999, 97, 6907- 6913.
25. Genheden, S.; Ryde, U. A Comparison of Different Initialization Protocols to Obtain Statistically Independent Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Comput. Chem. In press. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21546.
26. Lawrenz, M.; Baron, P.; McCammon, J. A. Independent- Trajectories Thermodynamic-Integration Free-Energy Changes for Biomolecular Systems: Determinants of H5N1 Avian Influenza Virus Neuraminidase Inhibition by Peramivir. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 1106-1116.
27. Collins, P. M.; Hidari, K. I. P. J.; Blanchard, H. Slow diffusion of lactose out of galectin-3 crystals monitored by X-ray crystallography: possible implications for ligand-exchange protocols. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D 2007, 63, 415-419.
28. Houlzelstein, D.; Goncalves, I. R.; Fadden, A. J.; Sidhu, S. S.; Cooper, D. N.; Drickamer, K.; Leffler, H.; Poirer, F. Phylogenetic Analysis of the Vertebrate Galectin Family. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21, 1177-1187.
29. Leffler, H.; Carlsson, S.; Hedlund, M.; Quian, Y. Introduction to galectins. Glycoconjugate J. 2002, 19, 433-440.
30. Liu, F.-T.; Rabinovich, G. A. Galectins as modulators of tumour progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5, 29-41.
31. Nakahara, S.; Oka, N.; Raz, A. On the role of galectin-3 in cancer apoptosis. Apoptosis 2005, 10, 267-275.
32. Liu, F.-T. Regulatory Roles of Galectins in the Immune Response. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2005, 136, 385-400.
33. Ilarrgui, J. M.; Bianco, G. A.; Toscano, M. A.; Rabinovich, G. A. New targets III: The coming of age of galectins as immunomodulatory agents: impact of these carbohydrate binding proteins in T cell physiology and chronic inflammatory disorders. Ann Rheum. Dis. 2005, 64, 96-103.
34. Patterson, R. J.; Wang, W.; Wang, J. L. Understanding the biochemical activities of galectin-1 and galectin-3 in the nucleus. Glycoconj. J. 2002, 19, 499-506.
35. Dumic, J.; Dabelic, S.; Flögel, M. Galectin-3: An open-ended story. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1760, 616-635.
36. Bachhawat-Sikder, K.; Thomas, C. J.; Suriola, A. Thermodynamic analysis of the binding of galactose and poly-Nacetyllactoseamine derivatives to human galectin-3. FEBS Lett. 2001, 500, 75-79.
37. Case, D. A.; Darden, T. A.; Cheatham, T. E. III; Simmerling, C. L.; Wang, J.; Duke, R. E.; Luo, R.; Crowley, M.; Walker, R. C.; Zhang, W.; Merz, K. M.; Wang, B.; Hayik, S.; Roitberg, A.; Seabra, G.; Kolossváry, I.; Wong, K. F.; Paesani, F.; Vanicek, J.; Wu, X.; Brozell, S. R.; Steinbrecher, T.; Gohlke, H.; Yang, L.; Tan, C.; Mongan, J.; Hornak, V.; Cui, G.; Mathews, D. H.; Seetin, M. G.; Sagui, C.; Babin, V.; Kollman, P. A. AMBER 10; University of California: San Francisco, 2008.
38. Diehl, C.; Genheden, S.; Modig, K.; Ryde, U.; Akke, M. Conformational entropy changes upon lactose binding to the carbohydrate recognition domain of galectin-3. J. Biomol. NMR 2009, 45, 157-169.
39. Horn, H. W.; Swope, W. C.; Pitera, J. W.; Madura, J. D.; Dick, T. J.; Hura, G.; Head-Gordon, T. Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 9665-9678.
40. Ryckaert, J. P; Ciccotti, G.; Berendsen, H. J. C. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 1977, 23, 327-341.
41. Wu, X.; Brooks, B. R. Self-guided Langevin dynamics simulation method. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 381, 512-518.
42. Berendsen, H. J. C.; Postma, J. P. M.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; DiNola, A.; Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 3684-3690.
43. Darden, T.; York, D.; Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: An N· log (N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 10089-10092.
44. Buck, M.; Karplus, M. Internal and overall peptide group motion in proteins: molecular dynamics simulations for lysozyme compared with results from X-ray and NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9645-9658.
45. Zwansig, R.; Ailawadi, N. K. Statistical Error Due to Finite Time Averaging in Computer Experiments. Phys. Rev. 1969, 1982, 280-282.
46. Lu, C.-Y.; Bout, D. A. V. Effect of finite trajectory length on the correlation function analysis of single molecule data. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 124701-124709.
47. Madsen, H. Time Series Analysis; Chapman & Hall/CRC: New York, 2008.
48. Efron, B.; Tibshirani, R. Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy. Statist. Sci. 1986, 1, 54-77.
49. Prompers, J. J.; Brüschweiler, R. General Framework for Studying the Dynamics of Folded and Nonfolded Proteins by NMR Relaxation Spectroscopy and MD Simulation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4522-4534.
50. Nederveen, A. J.; Bonvin, A. NMR relaxation and internal dynamics of ubiquitin from a 0.2 microsec MD simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2005, 1, 363-374.
51. Bowers, K.; Devolder, B.; Yin, L.; Kwan, T. A maximum likelihood method for linking particle-in-cell and Monte-Carlo transport simulations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2004, 164, 311-317.
52. Dempster, A. P.; Laird, N. M.; Rubin, M. D. Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 1977, 39, 1-38.
53. Meiler, J.; Promper, J. J.; Peti, W.; Griesinger, C.; Bruschweiler, R. Model-Free Approach to the Dynamic Interpretation of Residual Dipolar Couplings in Globular Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6098-6107.
54. Umemoto, K.; Leffler, H.; Venot, A.; Valafar, H.; Prestegard, J. H. Conformational differences in liganded and unliganded states of Galectin-3. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 3688-3695.
55. Pfeiffer, S.; Fushman, D.; Cowburn, D. Simulated and NMRDerived Backbone Dynamics of a Protein with Significant Flexibility: A Comparison of Spectral Densities for the -ARK1 PH Domain. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 112, 3021- 3036.
56. Kanibolotsky, D. S.; Ivanova, O. S.; Lisnyak, V. V. Comparison of NMR and MD NZH bond order parameters: example of HIV-1 protease. Mol. Sim. 2006, 32, 1155-1163.
57. MacRaild, C. A.; Daranas, A. H.; Bronowska, A.; Homans, S. W. Global Changes in Local Protein Dynamics Reduce the Entropic Cost of Carbohydrate Binding in the Arabinosebinding Protein. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 368, 822-832.
58. Markwick, P. R. L.; Bouvignies, G.; Blackledge, M. S. Exploring Multiple Timescale Motions in Protein GB3 Using Accelerated Molecular Dynamics and NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4724-4730.
59. Maragkis, P.; Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Eastwood, M. P.; Dror, R. O.; Klepeis, J. L.; Arkin, I. T.; Jensen, M. O.; Xu, H.; Trbovis, N.; Friesner, R. A.; Plamer III, A. G.; Shaw, D. E. Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulation Shows Effect of Slow Loop Dynamics on Backbone Amide Order Parameters of Proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 6155-6158.
60. Tong, Y.; Ji, C. G.; Mei, Y.; Zhang, J. Z. H. Simulation of NMR Data Reveals That Proteins' Local Structures Are Stabilized by Electronic Polarization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8636-8641.
61. Zhang, F.; Brüschweiler, R. Contact Model for the Prediction of NMR N-H Order Parameters in Globular Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12654-12655.