Spatial impacts of road pricing: Accessibility, regional spillovers and territorial cohesion

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 185-203

  Condeço Melhorado, Ana ^a   Gutiérrez, Javier ^b   García Palomares, Juan Carlos ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Geographical information systems (GIS); Regional spillovers; Road pricing; Territorial cohesion

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; ROADS AND STREETS; TRAFFIC CONTROL; TRANSPORTATION CHARGES;

ACCESSIBILITY; ACCESSIBILITY CHANGES; MOBILITY PATTERN; REGIONAL SPILLOVERS; ROAD PRICING; ROAD-PRICING POLICIES; SPILLOVER EFFECTS; TERRITORIAL COHESION;

COSTS;

ACCESSIBILITY; EUROPEAN UNION; GIS; PRICE DYNAMICS; ROAD PRICING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPILLOVER EFFECT; TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS; TRANSPORTATION POLICY;

SPAIN;

EID: 79251635526     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2010.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Beevers S.D., Carslaw D.C. The impact of congestion charging on vehicle emissions in London. Atmospheric Environment 2005, 39:1-5.
2. Bröcker, J., Capello, R., Lundqvist, L., Meyer, J., Rouwendal, J., Schneekloth, N., Spairani, A., Spangenberg, M., Spiekermann, K., Van Vuuren, D., Vickerman, R., Wegener, M., 2004. Final Report of Action 2.1.1. of the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (ESPON) 2000-2006 (Kiel: Christian-Albreschts-Universität Kiel).
3. Bruinsma F.R., Rietveld P. Urban agglomerations in European infrastructure networks. Urban Studies 1993, 30:919-934.
4. Bruinsma F.R., Rietveld P. The accessibility of European cities: theoretical framework and comparison approaches. Environment and Planning A 1998, 30:449-521.
5. Bureau B., Glachant M. Distributional effects of road pricing: assessment of nine scenarios for Paris. Transportation Research Part A 2008, 42:994-1007.
6. Camagni R. Territorial impact assessment for European regions: a methodological proposal and an application to EU transport policy. Evaluation and Program Planning 2009, 32:342-350.
7. Clark C., Wilson F., Bradley J. Industrial location and economic potential in Western Europe. Regional Studies 1969, 3:197-212.
8. Copus, A.K., 1999. A New Peripherality Index for the NUTS III Regions of the European Union. Aberdeen, Rural Policy Group, Management Division, Scottish Agricultural College, Report Number, Report for General Directorate XVI.A.4 (Regional Policy and Cohesion).
9. Cowell F. Measuring Inequality. LSE Handbooks in Economics 1995, Prentice Hall, London. second ed.
10. Daniel J., Bekka K. The environmental impact of highway congestion pricing. Journal of Urban Economics 2000, 47:180-215.
11. Dietzenbacher E., van der Linden J.A., Steenge A.E. The regional extraction method: EC input-output comparisons. Economic Systems Research 1993, 5(2):185-206.
12. Di Ciommo, F., Monzón, A., Comendador, J., 2010. Road transport social costs in Spain: a new rationale for pricing policy ID 02235. In: Selected Proceeding of the 12th World Conference on Transport Research Society, pp. E3 02235-8-13, ISBN 978-989-96986-1-1.
13. EU, 1998. Fair Payment for Infrastructure Use: A Phased Approach to a Common Transport Infrastructure Charging Framework in the EU. White Paper. COM (98) 466 Final.
14. EC, 2004. A New Partnership for Cohesion: Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation: Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
15. Eliasson J., Mattsson Lars-Göran Equity effects of congestion pricing: quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm. Transportation Research Part A 2006, 40(7):602-620.
16. Forslund U.M., Johansson B. Assessing road investments: accessibility changes, cost benefit and production effects. The Annals of Regional Science 1995, 29:155-174.
17. Frost M.E., Spence N.A. The rediscovery of accessibility and economic potential: the critical issue of self-potential. Environment and Planning A 1995, 27:1833-1848.
18. Geertman S.C.M., Ritsema Van Eck Jan R. GIS and models of accessibility potential: an application in planning. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 1995, 9:67-80.
19. Gutiérrez J., Monzón A., Piñero J.M. Accessibility, network efficiency, and transport infrastructure planning. Environment and Planning A 1998, 30:1337-1350.
20. Gutiérrez J. Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Journal of Transport Geography 2001, 9(4):229-242.
21. Gutiérrez J., Condeço A., Martín J.C. Using accessibility indicators and GIS to assess and monetarize spatial spillovers of transport infrastructure. Journal of Transport Geography 2010, 18(1):141-152.
22. Hansen W.G. How accessibility shapes land-use. Journal of American Institute of Planners 1959, 25(2):73-76.
23. Harris C.D. The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1954, 44:315-348.
24. Holl A. Start-ups and relocations: manufacturing plant location in Portugal. Papers in Regional Science 2004, 83:649-668.
25. Holl A. Twenty years of accessibility improvements. The case of the Spanish motorway building programme. Journal of Transport Geography 2007, 15:286-297.
26. Johansson O. Optimal road-pricing: simultaneous treatment of time losses, increased fuel consumption, and emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 1997, 2:77-87.
27. Keeble, D., Offord, J., Walker, S., 1988. Peripheral Regions in a Community of Twelve. Brussels/Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
28. Karlström A., Franklin J.P. Behavioral adjustments and equity effects of congestion pricing: analysis of morning commutes during the Stockholm Trial. Transportation Research Part A 2009, 43:283-296.
29. Linneker B., Spence N.A. Accessibility measures compared in an analysis of the impact of the M25 London Orbital Motorway on Britain. Environment and Planning A 1992, 24:1137-1154.
30. López S., Gutiérrez J., Gómez G. Measuring regional cohesion effects of large-scale transport infrastructure investments: an accessibility approach. European Planning Studies 2008, 16:277-301.
31. Lutter, H., Pütz, T., Spangenberg, T., 1992. Accessibility and Peripherality of Community Regions: The Role of Road, Long-Distance Railways and Airport Networks. Report Number, Report to the European Commission DG XVII. Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landeskunde und Raumordnung, Bonn.
32. Llano C., Esteban A., Pérez J., Pulido A. Breaking The Interregional Trade " Black Box": The C-Intereg Database for the Spanish Economy (1995-2005). International Regional Science Review 2010, 33:302-337.
33. Martín J.C., Gutiérrez J., Román C. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) index to measure the accessibility impacts of new infrastructure investments: The case of the high-speed train corridor Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Regional Studies 2004, 38(6):697-712.
34. May A.D., Milne D.S. Effects of alternative road pricing systems on network performance. Transportation Research Part A 2000, 34(6):407-436.
35. Ministerio de Fomento Mapa de velocidades de tráfico 2005 2005, Ministerio de Fomento, Madrid.
36. Morris J.M., Dumble P.L., Wigan M.R. Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research Part A 1978, 13:91-109.
37. Olszewski P., Xie L. Modelling the effects of road pricing on traffic in Singapore. Transportation Research Part A 2005, 39:755-772.
38. Pereira M.A., Roca-Sagalés O.R. Spillover effects of public capital formation: evidence from the Spanish regions. Journal of Urban Economics 2003, 53:238-256.
39. Reggiani A. Accessibility, Trade and Locational Behaviour 1998, Ashgate.
40. Ribeiro A., Pais A., Páez A. Road accessibility and cohesion in lagging regions: empirical evidence from Portugal based on spatial econometric models. Journal of Transport Geography 2010, 18(1):125-132.
41. Rich, D., 1975. Accessibility and Economic Activity: A Study of Locational Disadvantage in Scotland. Unpubl. PhD Thesis, Univ. of Cambridge.
42. Rotaris L., Danielis R., Marcucci E., Massiani J. The urban road pricing scheme to curb pollution in Milan, Italy: description, impacts and preliminary cost-benefit analysis assessment. Transportation Research Part A 2010, 44:359-375.
43. Schürman, C., Spiekermann, K., Wegener, M., 1997. Accessibility Indicators. Berichte aus dem Institut für Raumplanung, 39, IRPUD, Dortmund.
44. Schürmann, C., Talaat, A., 2000. Towards a European Peripherality Index. Dortmund: Report Number, Final Report.
45. Spence N., Linneker B. Evolution of the motorway network and changing levels of accessibility in Great Britain. Journal of Transport Geography 1994, 2:247-264.
46. Tillema, T., van Wee, B., de Jong, T., 2003. Road pricing from a Geographical Perspective: A Literature Review and Implications for Research into Accessibility. Paper Presented at the 43rd ERSA Congreso, Jyväskylä (Finland).
47. Tillema, T., Jong, T., Wee, B., 2007. Modelización de la accesibilidad geográfica en condiciones de tarificación viaria. In: Martín, J.C., Reggiani, A., Rietveld, P. (Eds.), Las redes de transporte desde un enfoque multidisciplinar. Thomson Civitas, pp. 397-426.
48. Tillema T., Jong T., Wee B., van Amelsfort D. Sensitivity of geographical accessibility measures under road-pricing conditions. Pricing in Road Transport 2008, Edward Elgar Publishing. L. Steg, E. Verhoef, M. Bliemer, B. van Bee (Eds.).
49. Viegas J.M. Making urban road pricing acceptable and effective: searching for quality and equity in urban mobility. Transport Policy 2001, 8:289-294.
50. Friedrich R., Bickel P. Environmental External Costs of Transport 2001, Springer, Berlin.
51. Ministry of Public Works, 2006. Encuesta Permanente del Transporte de Mercancías por Carretera 2005. Madrid, Centro de Publicaciones, Secretaría General Técnica, Ministerio de Fomento.
52. Small K.A., Winston C., Evans C.A. Road Work: A New Highway Pricing and Investment Policy 1989, The Bookings Institution, Washington.
53. Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual 2000, TRB, Washington.
54. Weinberger, M., Thomassen, G., Willeke, R., 1991. Kosten des Lärms in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berichte 9/91 des Umweltbundesamtes, Berlin.