Potential applications of the da Vinci minimally invasive surgical robotic system in otolaryngology

Ear, Nose and Throat Journal

Volumn 84, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 483-487

  McLeod, Ian K ^a   Mair, Eric A ^b   Melder, Patrick C ^a  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b WILFORD HALL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CAUTERIZATION; EAR NOSE THROAT DISEASE; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; HEAD; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NECK; NONHUMAN; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SUTURING METHOD; SWINE; ANIMAL; EAR NOSE THROAT SURGERY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANIMALS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ROBOTICS; SWINE;

EID: 33644678397     PISSN: 01455613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/014556130508400810     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Miccoli P, Bendinelli C, Conte M, et al. Endoscopic parathyroidectomy by a gasless approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1998;8:189-94.
2. Miccoli P, Bendinelli C, Berti P, et al. Video-assisted versus conventional parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism: A prospective randomized study. Surgery 1999;126:1117-21.
3. Miccoli P, Berti P, Raffaelli M, et al. Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: A prospective randomized study. Surgery 2001; 130:1039-43.
4. Bellantone R, Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, et al. Video-assisted thyroidectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2002;194:610-14.
5. Dulguerov P, Leuchter I, Szalay-Quinodoz I, et al. Endoscopic neck dissection in human cadavers. Laryngoscope 2001;111:2135-9.
6. Hashizume M, Konishi K, Tsutsumi N, et al. A new era of robotic surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surgery 2002;131(1 suppl):S330-3.
7. Mack MJ. Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. JAMA 2001;285:568-72.
8. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, et al. Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: Feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg 2002;235:487-92.
9. Bucerius J, Metz S, Walther T, et al. Endoscopic internal thoracic artery dissection leads to significant reduction of pain after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1180-4.
10. Boyd WD, Kodera K, Stahl KD, Rayman R. Current status and future directions in computer-enhanced video- and robotic-assisted coronary bypass surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;14:101-9.
11. LaPietra A, Grossi EA, Derivaux CC, et al. Robotic-assisted instruments enhance minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:835-8.
12. Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 2001;25:1467-77.
13. Guillonneau B, Jayet C, Tewari A, Vallancien G. Robot assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 2001;166:200-1.
14. Pasticier G, Rietbergen JB, Guillonneau B, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Feasibility study in men. Eur Urol 2001;40:70-4.
15. Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol 2001;165:1964-6.
16. Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H, Stevens L. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: A human pilot study. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1040-2.
17. Sung GT, Gill IS. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: A comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems. Urology 2001;58:893-8.
18. Buckingham RA, Buckingham RO. Robots in operating theatres. BMJ 1995;311:1479-82.
19. Nio D, Bemelman WA, Boer KT, et al. Efficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks. Surg Endosc 2002;16:412-15.
20. Kavanagh KT. Applications of image-directed robotics in otolaryngologic surgery. Laryngoscope 1994;104:283-93.
21. McLeod IK, Melder PC. Da Vinci robot-assisted excision of a vallecular cyst: A case report. Ear Nose Throat J 2005;84:170-2.