Invention property-function network analysis of patents: A case of silicon-based thin film solar cells

Scientometrics

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 687-703

  Yoon, Janghyeok ^a   Choi, Sungchul ^a   Kim, Kwangsoo ^a  

^a Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Function; Natural language processing; Patent analysis; Patent mining; Property; Social network analysis; Technological trend; Technology analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 79251598379     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0303-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alcacer, J., & Gittelman, M. (2006). Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 774-779.
2. Bollobas, B. (1983). The evolution of sparse graphs. Graph theory and combinatorics (pp. 35-57). London: Academic Press.
3. Callon, M., Courtial, J., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155-205.
4. Callon, M., Courtial, J., Turner, W., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191.
5. Chang, P., Wu, C., & Leu, H. (2010). Using patent analyses to monitor the technological trends in an emerging field of technology: A case of carbon nanotube field emission display. Scientometrics, 82(1), 5-19.
6. Chen, L., Tokuda, N., & Adachi, H. (2003). A patent document retrieval system addressing both semantic and syntactic properties. In: Proceedings of the ACL-2003 workshop on patent corpus processing (pp. 1-6). Japan: Sapporo.
7. Choi, S., Lim, J., Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2010). Patent function network analysis: In: A function based approach for analyzing patent information. Egypt, Cairo: IAMOT.
8. de Marneffe, M., & Manning, C. (2008a). Stanford typed dependencies manual. Technical report.
9. de Marneffe, M., & Manning, C. (2008b). The stanford typed dependencies representation. In: Association for computational linguistics (pp. 1-8). Stanford: Stanford University.
10. Dewulf, S. (2006). Directed variation: Variation of properties for new or improved function product DNA, a base for 'connect and develop'. Kortrijk, Belgium: ETRIA TRIZ Futures.
11. Diestel, R. (2005). Graph theory. Graduate texts in mathematics (vol. 173). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
12. Freeman, L. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239.
13. Hanneman, R., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside.
14. Hendrix, D. (2009). Institutional self-citation rates: A three year study of universities in the united states. Scientometrics, 81(2), 321-331.
15. Hirtz, J., Stone, R., McAdams, D., Szykman, S., & Wood, K. (2001). A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Research in Engineering Design, 13(2), 65-82.
16. Hopcroft, J., & Tarjan, R. (1973). Algorithm 447: Efficient algorithms for graph manipulation. Communications of the ACM, 16(6), 372-378.
17. Klein, D., & Manning, C. (2003). Fast exact inference with a factored model for natural language parsing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 15, 3-10.
18. Kostoff, R. (1998). The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation. Scientometrics, 43(1), 27-43.
19. Lee, B., & Jeong, Y. (2008). Mapping Korea's national r& d domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 77(1), 3-19.
20. Mann, D. (2002). Hands-on systematic innovation. Belgium: Creax press.
21. Neff, M., & Corley, E. (2009). 35 years and 160, 000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology. Scientometrics, 80(3), 657-682.
22. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
23. Stanford. (2010). The stanford parser: A statistical parser. http://nlp. stanford. edu/software/lex-parser. shtml.
24. STOPWORDS. (2010). English stopwords. http://www. ranks. nl/resources/stopwords. html.
25. Thompson, P., & Fox-Kean, M. (2005). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment. American Economic Review, 95(1), 450-460.
26. Tong, L., Cong, H., & Lixiang, S. (2006). Automatic classification of patent documents for triz users. World Patent Information, 28(1), 6-13.
27. Verhaegen, P. A., D'Hondt, J., Vertommen, J., Dewulf, S., & Duflou, J. R. (2009). Relating properties and functions from patents to triz trends. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 1(3), 126-130.
28. Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2004). A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15(1), 37-50.
29. Zhang, L., Janssens, F., Liang, L., & Glanzel, W. (2010). Journal cross-citation analysis for validation and improvement of journal-based subject classification in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 82(3), 687-706.
30. Zhang, W., Qian, W., & Ho, Y. (2009). A bibliometric analysis of research related to ocean circulation. Scientometrics, 80(2), 305-316.