The Electrodiagnostic Evaluation of Radiculopathy

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 59-74

  Plastaras, Christopher T ^a   Joshi, Anand B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrodiagnosis; Electromyography; Radiculopathy; Spinal stenosis

Indexed keywords

BACK MUSCLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; ELECTROMYOGRAM; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; HOFFMANN REFLEX; HUMAN; MOTOR NERVE CONDUCTION; NEEDLE ELECTRODE EXAMINATION; NERVE ROOT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICULOPATHY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSORY NERVE CONDUCTION;

ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; HUMANS; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; MUSCLES; NEURAL CONDUCTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; RADICULOPATHY; SKIN;

EID: 79251592262     PISSN: 10479651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2010.10.005     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Shelerud R.A., Paynter K.S. Rarer causes of radiculopathy: spinal tumors, infections, and other unusual causes. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2002, 13(3):645-696.
2. Nardin R.A., Patel M.R., Gudas T.F., et al. Electromyography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of radiculopathy. Muscle Nerve 1999, 22:151-155.
3. Boden S.D., McCowin P.R., Davis D.O., et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990, 72:1178-1184.
4. Jensen M.C., Brant-Zawadzki M.N., Obuchowski N., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 1994, 331(2):69-73.
5. Wilbourn A.J., Aminoff M.J. AAEM Minimonograph 32: the electrodiagnostic examination in patients with radiculopathies. Muscle Nerve 1998, 21:1612-1631.
6. Cannon D.E., Dillingham T.R., Miao H., et al. Musculoskeletal disorders in referrals for suspected lumbosacral radiculopathy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007, 86(12):957-961.
7. Lauder T.D., Dillingham T.R., Andary M., et al. Effect of history and exam in predicting electrodiagnostic outcome among patients with suspected lumbosacral radiculopathy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000, 79:60-68.
8. Lauder T.D., Dillingham T.R., Andary M., et al. Predicting electrodiagnostic outcome in patients with upper limb symptoms: are the history and physical examination helpful?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000, 81:436-441.
9. Uysal, Seker M., Karabulut A.K., et al. Brachial plexus variations in human fetuses. Neurosurgery 2003, 53:676-684.
10. Pellerin M., Kimball Z., Tubbs R.S., et al. The prefixed and postfixed brachial plexus: a review with surgical implications. Surg Radiol Anat 2010, 32:251-260.
11. Johnson E.O., Vekris M., Demesticha T., et al. Neuroanatomy of the brachial plexus: normal and variant anatomy of its formation. Surg Radiol Anat 2010, 32:291-297.
12. Loukas M., Lewis R.G., Wartman C.T. T2 Contributions to the Brachial Plexus. Neurosurgery 2007, 60:S13-S18.
13. Grana E.A., Kraft G.H. Lumbosacral Radiculopathies: distribution of electromyographic findings. Muscle Nerve 1992, 15(10):1204.
14. Young A., Getty J., Jackson A., et al. Variations in the pattern of muscle innervation by the L5 and S1 nerve roots. Spine 1983, 8(6):616-624.
15. Kim Y.H., Lee P.B., Lee C.J., et al. Dermatome variation in lumbosacral nerve roots in patients with transitional lumbosacral vertebrae. Anesth Analg 2008, 106(4):1279-1283.
16. Fisher M.A. Electrophysiology of radiculopathies. Clin Neurophysiol 2002, 113:317-335.
17. Waylonis G.W. Electromyographic findings in chronic cervical radicular symptoms. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1968, 49:407-412.
18. Tonzola R.F., Ackil A.A., Shahani B.T., et al. Usefulness of electrophysiological studies in the diagnosis of lumbosacral root disease. Ann Neurol 1981, 9(3):305-308.
19. Haig A.J., Tong H.C., Yamakawa K.S., et al. The sensitivity and specificity of electrodiagnostic testing for the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2005, 30(23):2667-2676.
20. Coster S., de Bruijn S.F., Tavy D.L. Diagnostic Value of history, physical examination, and needle electromyography in diagnosing lumbosacral radiculopathy. J Neurol 2010, 257:332-337.
21. Yiannikas C., Shahani B.T., Young R.R. Short-latency somatosensory-evoked potentials from radial, median, ulnar, and peroneal nerve stimulation in the assessment of cervical spondylosis. Arch Neurol 1986, 43:1264-1271.
22. Tackman W., Radu E.W. Observations of the application of electrophysiological methods in the diagnosis of cervical root compressions. Eur Neurol 1983, 22:397-404.
23. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine Practice parameter for needle electromyographic evaluation of patients with suspected cervical radiculopathy: summary statement. Muscle Nerve 1999, 22(Suppl 8):S209-S211.
24. Levin K.H. Electrodiagnostic approach to the patient with suspected radiculopathy. Neurol Clin 2002, 20(2):397-421.
25. Ho Y.H., Yan S.H., Lin Y.T., et al. Sensory nerve conduction studies of the superficial peroneal nerve in L5 radiculopathy. Acta Neurol Taiwan 2004, 13(3):114-119.
26. Richardson J.K., Forman G.M., Riley B. An electrophysiological exploration of the double crush hypothesis. Muscle Nerve 1999, 22:71-77.
27. Stevens J.C., Sun S., Beard C.M., et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome in Rochester, Minnesota, 1961 to 1980. Neurology 1988, 38(1):134-138.
28. Upton A.R.M., McComas A.J. The double crush in nerve entrapment syndromes. Lancet 1973, 2:359-362.
29. Kwon H.-K., Hwang M., Yoon D- W. Frequency and severity of carpal tunnel syndrome according to level of cervical radiculopathy: double crush syndrome?. Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 117:1256-1259.
30. Frith R.W., Litchy W.J. Electrophysiologic abnormalities of peripheral nerves in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Muscle Nerve 1985, 8:613.
31. Morgan G., Wilbourn A.J. Cervical radiculopathy and coexisting distal entrapment neuropathies: double crush syndrome?. Neurology 1998, 50:78-83.
32. Wilbourn A.J. AAEE Case Report #12: common peroneal mononeuropathy at the fibular head. Muscle Nerve 1986, 9:825-836.
33. Radhakrishnan K., Litchy W.J., O'Fallon W.M., et al. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain 1994, 117:325-335.
34. Fisher M.A. H reflexes and F waves, fundamentals, normal and abnormal patterns. Neurol Clin 2002, 20:339-360.
35. Magladery J.W., Porter W.E., Park A.M., et al. Electrophysiological studies of nerve and reflex activity in normal man. IV. The two-neurone reflex and identification of certain action potentials from spinal roots and cord. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1951, 88(6):499-519.
36. Burke D., Gandevia S.C., McKeon B. Monosynaptic and oligosynaptic contributions to the human ankle jerk and H-reflex. J Neurophysiol 1984, 52(3):435-448.
37. Panizza M., Nilsson J., Hallett M. Optimal stimulus duration for the H reflex. Muscle Nerve 1989, 12:576-579.
38. Tsao B.E., Levin K.H., Bodner R.A. Comparison of surgical and electrodiagnostic findings in single root lumbosacral radiculopathies. Muscle Nerve 2003, 27:60-64.
39. Kalyon T.A., Bilgic F., Ertem O. The diagnostic value of late responses in radiculopathies due to disc herniation. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983, 23(3):183-186.
40. Braddom R.L., Johnson E.W. H reflex: review and classification with suggested clinical uses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1974, 55(9):412-417.
41. Nishida T., Kompoliti A., Janssen I., et al. H Reflex in S-1 Radiculopathy: latency versus amplitude controversy revisited. Muscle Nerve 1996, 19:915-917.
42. Braddom R.I., Johnson E.W. Standardization of H Reflex and diagnostic use in S1 radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1974, 55:161-166.
43. New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology 1973, Karger, Basel (Switzerland), No. 3. p. 277-93. J.E. Desmedt (Ed.).
44. Nishida T., Levy C.E., Lewit E.J., et al. Comparison of three methods for recording tibial H reflex: a clinical note. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1999, 78(5):474-476.
45. Dumitru D. Comparison of three methods for recording tibial H reflex: a clinical note. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000, 79(3):311-315.
46. Jabre J.F. Surface recording of the H-Reflex of the flexor carpi radialis. Muscle Nerve 1981, 4:435-438.
47. Christie A.D., Inglis J.G., Boucher J.P., et al. Reliability of the FCR H-Reflex. J Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 22(3):204-209.
48. Schimsheimer R.J., Ongerboer de Visser B.W., Kemp B. The flexor carpi radialis H-reflex in lesions of the sixth and seventh cervical nerve roots. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1985, 48:445-449.
49. Eliaspour D., Sanati E., Moqadam M.R.H., et al. Utility of Flexor Carpi radialis H-reflex in diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. J Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 26(6):458-460.
50. Panayiotoupoulos C.P., Chroni E. F-waves in clinical neurophysiology: a review, methodological issues and overall value in peripheral neuropathies. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996, 101:365-374.
51. Toyokura M., Murakami K. F-wave study in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathies. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997, 37(1):19-26.
52. Scelsa S.N., Herskovitz S., Berger A.R. The diagnostic utility of F waves in L5/S1 radiculopathy. Muscle Nerve 1995, 18(12):1496-1497.
53. Tang L.M., Schwartz M.S., Swash M. Postural effects on F wave parameters in lumbosacral root compression and canal stenosis. Brain 1988, 111:207-213.
54. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine Somatosensory evoked potentials: clinical uses. Muscle Nerve 1999, 22(Suppl 8):S111-S118.
55. Storm S.A., Kraft G.H. The clinical use of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in lumbosacral spinal stenosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2004, 15:107-115.
56. Kraft G.H. Dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potentials in the evaluation of lumbosacral spinal stenosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2003, 14:71-75.
57. Snowden M.L., Haselkorn J.K., Kraft G.H., et al. Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in the diagnosis of lumbosacral spinal stenosis: comparison with imaging studies. Muscle Nerve 1992, 15:1036-1044.
58. Kraft G.H. A physiological approach to the evaluation of lumbosacral spinal stenosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 1998, 9(2):381-389.
59. Hoefer P.F.A., Guttman S.A. Electromyography as a method for determination of level of lesions in the spinal cord. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1944, 51(5):415-422.
60. Tsao B. The electrodiagnosis of cervical and lumbosacral radiculopathy. Neurol Clin 2007, 25:473-494.
61. Kraft G.H. Fibrillation potential amplitude and muscle atrophy following peripheral nerve injury. Muscle Nerve 1990, 13:814-821.
62. Jiang G.L., Zhang L.Y., Shen L.Y., et al. Fibrillation potential amplitude to quantitatively assess denervation muscle atrophy. Neuromuscul Disord 2000, 10:85-91.
63. Dillingham T.R., Lauder T.D., Andary M., et al. Identifying lumbosacral radiculopathies: an optimal electromyographic screen. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000, 79:496-503.
64. Lauder T.D., Dillingham T.R. The cervical radiculopathy screen: optimizing the number of muscles studied. Muscle Nerve 1996, 19:662-665.
65. Dillingham T.R., Lauder T.D., Andary M., et al. Identification of cervical radiculopathies: optimizing the electromyographic screen. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001, 80:84-91.
66. Lauder T.D., Dillingham T.R., Huston C.W., et al. Lumbosacral radiculopathy screen: optimizing the number of muscles studied. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994, 73(6):394-402.
67. Buchthal F., Pinell P., Rosenfalck P. Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their physiological determinants. Acta Physiol Scand 1954, 32(2-3):219-229.
68. Crane C.R., Krusen E.M. Significance of polyphasic potentials in the diagnosis of cervical root involvement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1968, 49:403-406.
69. LaJoie W.J. Nerve root compression: correlation of electromyographic, myelographic, and surgical findings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1972, 53:390-392.
70. Electrodiagnostic Medicine 2002, Hanley & Belfus, Philadelphia, p. 713-76. 2nd edition. D. Dumitru, A.A. Amato, M. Zwarts (Eds.).
71. Dillingham T.R., Pezzin L.E., Lauder T., et al. Symptom duration and spontaneous activity in lumbosacral radiculopathy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000, 79(2):124-132.
72. Levin K.H., Maggiano H.J., Wilbourn A.J. Cervical radiculopathies: comparison of surgical and EMG localization of single-root lesions. Neurology 1996, 46(4):1022-1025.
73. Jonsson B., Rundgren A. The peroneus longus and brevis muscles: a roentgenologic and electromyographic study. Electromyography 1971, 11(1):93-103.
74. Woods W.W., Shea P.A. The value of electromyography in neurology and neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 1951, 8(6):595-607.
75. Danner R. Occurrence of transient positive sharp wave like activity in the paraspinal muscles following lumbar puncture. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982, 22:149-154.
76. Johnson E.W., Burkhart J.A., Eart W.C. Electromyography in postlaminectomy patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1972, 53:407-409.
77. Dumitru D., Diaz C.A., King J.C. Prevalence of denervation in paraspinal and foot intrinsic musculature. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001, 80:482-490.
78. Fish D.E., Shirazi E.P., Pham Q. The use of electromyography to predict functional outcome following transforaminal epidural spinal injections for lumbar radiculopathy. J Pain 2008, 9(1):64-70.
79. Alrawi M.F., Khalil N.M., Mitchell P., et al. The value of neurophysiological and imaging studies in predicting outcome in the surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J 2007, 16(4):495-500.
80. Tullberg T., Svanborg E., Isaccsson J., et al. A preoperative and postoperative study of the accuracy and value of electrodiagnosis in patients with lumbosacral disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993, 18(7):837-842.