Determination of split renal function by 3D reconstruction of CT angiograms: A comparison with gamma camera renography

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 191, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1552-1558

  Summerlin, Adam L ^a   Lockhart, Mark E ^b   Strang, Andrew M ^c   Kolettis, Peter N ^c   Fineberg, Naomi S ^a   Smith, J Kevin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^c Kentucky   (United States)

Author keywords

3D kidney modeling; Kidney transplantation; Renal artery; Renography; Split renal function

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY TOMOGRAPHY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCINTIANGIOGRAPHY; SCINTILLATION CAMERA;

ADULT; ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GAMMA CAMERAS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOISOTOPE RENOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 55549104022     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.4023     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Shokeir AA, Gad HM, el-Diasty T. Role of radioisotope renal scans in the choice of nephrectomy side in live kidney donors. J Urol 2003; 170:373-376
2. 3 renography determined in healthy, potential renal donors. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2002; 22:356-360
3. Houston AS, Whalley DR, Skrypniuk JV, Jarritt PH, Fleming JS, Cosgriff PS. UK audit and analysis of quantitative parameters obtained from gamma camera renography. Nucl Med Commun 2001; 22:559-566
4. Lin WY, Changlai SP, Kao CH. Normal ranges of renal physiological parameters for technetium-99m mercaptoacetyltriglycine and the influence of age and sex using a camera-based method. Urol Int 1998; 60:11-16
5. O'Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Martin PJ, Pollard AJ, Farah NB, Mason GC. Accuracy and reproducibility of a new contrast clearance method for the determination of glomerular filtration rate. BMJ 1986; 293:234-236
6. Brown SC, O'Reilly PH. Iohexol clearance for the determination of glomerular filtration rate in clinical practice: evidence for a new gold standard. J Urol 1991; 146:675-679
7. Thomsen HS, Morcos SK. Contrast media and the kidney: European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines. Br J Radiol 2003; 76:513-518
8. Nilsson H, Wadstrom J, Andersson LG, Raland H, Magnusson A. Measuring split renal function in renal donors: can computed tomography replace renography? Acta Radiol 2004; 45:474-480
9. Miles KA. Measurement of tissue perfusion by dynamic computed tomography. Br J Radiol 1991; 64:409-412
10. Frennby B, Almen T, Lilja B, et al. Determination of the relative glomerular filtration rate of each kidney in man: comparison between iohexol CT and 99mTc-DTPA scintigraphy. Acta Radiol 1995; 36:410-417
11. Frennby B, Almen T. Use of spiral CT and the contrast medium iohexol to determine in one session aortorenal morphology and the relative glomerular filtration rate of each kidney. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:2270-2277
12. el-Diasty TA, Shokeir AA, el-Ghar ME, Gad HM, Refaie AF, el-Din AB. Contrast enhanced spiral computerized tomography in live kidney donors: a single session for anatomical and functional assessment. J Urol 2004; 171:31-34
13. Bjorkman H, Eklof H, Wadstrom J, Andersson LG, Nyman R, Magnusson A. Split renal function in patients with suspected renal artery stenosis: a comparison between gamma camera renography and two methods of measurement with computed tomography. Acta Radiol 2006; 47:107-113
14. Hackstein N, Buch T, Rau WS, Weimer R, Klett R. Split renal function measured by triphasic helical CT. Eur J Radiol 2007; 61:303-309
15. Pham PC, Wilkinson AH, Pham PT. Evaluation of the potential living kidney donor. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 50:1043-1051