Dipolar anisotropy fiber imaging in a goat knee meniscus

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 463-470

  Szeverenyi, Nikolaus M ^a   Bydder, Graeme M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

DAFI; dipolar anisotropy fiber imaging; fiber tracking; knee meniscus; unaveraged dipolar interactions

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; CARTILAGE; CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; COLLAGEN; FIBERS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TENSORS;

DAFI; DIPOLAR ANISOTROPY; DIPOLAR INTERACTION; FIBER TRACKING; KNEE MENISCUS;

DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING;

COLLAGEN FIBER;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; GOAT; KNEE MENISCUS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 79251580675     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22645     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Fullerton GD, Cameron IL, Ord VA,. Orientation of tendons in the magnetic field and its effect on T2 relaxation times. Radiology 1985; 155: 433-435.
2. Peto S, Gillis P,. Fiber-to-field angle dependence of proton nuclear magnetic relaxation in collagen. Magn Reson Imaging 1990; 8: 705-712.
3. Bydder M, Rahal A, Fullerton GD, Bydder GM,. The magic angle effect: a source of artifact, determinant of image contrast, and technique for imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 290-300.
4. Berendsen HJC,. Nuclear magnetic resonance study of collagen hydration. J Chem Phys 1962; 36: 3297-3305.
5. Krasnosselskaia LV, Fullerton GD, Dodd SJ, Cameron IL,. Water in tendon: orientational analysis of the free induction decay. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 280-288.
6. Watanabe A, Boesch C, Anderson SE, Brehm W, Mainil Varlet P,. Ability of dGEMRIC and T2 mapping to evaluate cartilage repair after microfracture: a goat study. Osteoarthr Cartil 2009; 17: 1341-1349.
7. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ,. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Int 2004; 11: 36-42.
8. Woolrich MW, Jbabdi S, Patenaude B, Chappell M, Makni S, Behrens T, Beckmann C, Jenkinson M, Smith SM,. Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. Neuroimage 2009; 45: S173-S186.
9. Henkelman RM, Stanisz GJ, Kim JK, Bronskill MJ,. Anisotropy of NMR properties of tissues. Magn Reson Med 1994; 32: 592-601.
10. Deloche B, Samulski ET,. Short-range nematic-like orientational order in strained elastomersâa deuterium magnetic-resonance study. Macromolecules 1981; 14: 575-581.
11. Bax A, Grishaev A,. Weak alignment NMR: a hawk-eyed view of biomolecular structure. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005; 15: 563-570.
12. Liu T, Spincemaille P, de Rochefort L, Kressler B, Wang Y,. Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 196-204.
13. Jiang HY, van Zijl PCM, Kim J, Pearlson GD, Mori S,. DtiStudio: Resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2006; 81: 106-116.
14. Petersen W, Tillmann B,. Collagenous fibril texture of the human knee joint menisci. Anat Embryol 1998; 197: 317-324.